Egyptian Theatre

6712 Hollywood Boulevard,
Los Angeles, CA 90028

Unfavorite 95 people favorited this theater

Showing 226 - 250 of 250 comments

VincentParisi on February 5, 2004 at 2:20 pm

I just hope that one day LA and NY will have movie theaters based on the American Cinemateque which will be able to show the films from the silents to the roadshows in the environments they were originally shown(adaptive ingenuity will be of use here) with a smaller theater for the films from the ‘70’s on(I can’t picture Altman in a movie palace or roadshow type house..)
By the way apropos my comment about the Film Forum, they have the best programmer in the world, I only wish he had a theater to show the films in and not a screening room.

William on February 5, 2004 at 2:04 pm

The former twin was originally a store that was converted into theatres. The last time I saw the twins, they were being used for plays or rock bands. The twin was the worst place to see a movie on Hollywood Blvd. They were just leased to UA, not owned. A few years before UA left the Egyptian Theatre. They had plans to turn the Egyptian Theatre and block area around it, into something like the Arc-Light, Chinese Theatres. They would have the large main theatre plus a modern 6-10 plex theatre location for new & move-over films and new stores and food on the site. But something went wrong with the city end and the plan was dropped and then the Northridge earthquake.

RobertR on February 5, 2004 at 1:36 pm

Thats why I brought up the former twin, couldent they have used that for 2 more screening rooms?

William on February 5, 2004 at 1:19 pm

Most of the money for the new Disney concert hall came from Walt’s widow. And that has been a long troubled trip from ground breaking to opening. There would be some problems with returning a large say D-150 type screen back into the theatre. Most of it would be space. The curved screen could not be flown into the fly tower of the theatre like a regular type screen, because to return the former D-150 screen was 90 feet wide.
I would have liked to see the Egyptian Theatre fully restored like it once was. American Cinemateque has done a fine job returning the theatre back from the dead. One of the things they wanted was to have two screening theatres at one location. Like the Motion Picture Academy in Beverly Hills and like the Director’s Guild (which has three screening theatres). If they had not put in that second screening theatre (named after Steven Spielberg). They would have had more room to restore the main house. Every one has brought up good points on the restoration here. It’s like the old theatre owner twinning his single screen theatre. So he could make more money at one location. American Cinemateque can offer a film maker two state of the art screening rooms for his or her films.

RobertR on February 5, 2004 at 11:54 am

What happened to the space next store where UA had the mini twin? I remember at the end UA ran this place so into the ground it was disgusting. I am just glad it is open and was not torn down. Alot was said about ripping out the arch to put in the d-150 screen. Couldent it have been re-created? More sense might have been to put in a huge 150 or Cinerama screen rather then the unimpressive one there now.

VincentParisi on February 5, 2004 at 11:26 am

Thank you Bruce.
The point I’m trying to make is that you give somebody Sid Grauman’s Hollywood Egyption and they turn it into New York’s Film Forum. If you don’t see that there is something very wrong here you are simply not paying attention. And as for not having money for the Warner or Egyption if LA can find a mountain of money for a new concert hall(and LA needs a new concert hall like Bagdad needs an American Cinemateque) which is nothing but a major vanity production for the architect, the politicians and the LA rich it could have easily found the money to properly restore these two historic buidings. Let’s face it, culturally we have nothing on the people who created these theaters.

bruceanthony on February 4, 2004 at 6:35 pm

Im sorry but I am an avid film patron and saw many films at the Egyptian. Im glad its been saved and is being used. This is Hollywood and I hope in the future this theatre is restored. It doesn’t look like a movie palace, or the deluxe roadshow house of the 1950’s and the 1960’s that it once was. Small towns around the US have restored there theatres that look a lot better than the Egyptian.If you want to see what a movie palace looks like go to the Pantages,Chinese and El Capitan. The film programing and picture and sound at the Egyptian are excellent. I guess I am spoiled because I was involved with one of the first authentic restoration of a movie palace the Paramount(3000seats) in Oakland back in 1972. I remember Francis Ford Coppola looking around the theatre in amazement. Im looking for the wow factor and the Egytian isn’t it.brucec

William on February 4, 2004 at 3:43 pm

The Egyptian Theatre may be seen as a glorified screening room to what it once looked like. But the real damage happened in 1969 when UA did the D-150 install to the theatre. They ripped out the Egyptian proscenium and installed a giant 90 foot screen. And another problem is when UA dropped the theatre, it sat empty. With homeless people and street kids living inside. UA dumpped this once great palace and left it to rot on Hollywood Blvd. If you see the Paramount movie “Jimmy Hollywood”, you can see some of the theatre damage. And being from and living and working in Southern California area. You can’t drop the earthquake idea from the restoration of the theatre. The theatre was built in 1921-22 and has since gone through many rumbles over the years. Since the theatre is made of brick. It may look solid, but the Egyptian did loss some bricks in the fly tower and side walls during the Northridge Earthquake 1994. An earthquake retro-fit can add 12-15 million on to your budget. It’s not just the walls and roof of the building, it’s also the new building codes and wiring too. The Art-Deco Warner Beverly Hills Theatre would still be standing and in use today. Because the building needed a earthquake retro-fit that the owners were not going to do in 1989. The theatre was razed.

VincentParisi on February 4, 2004 at 12:34 pm

Well yes it’s very nice that it exists at all but think of the potential. After all you can show these films in a cineplex and they would look the same. But to have the Egyption and simply convert it to a glorified screening room(which some of the comments make it seem like) is a reel waste. And Hollywood and LA with more money that God(put together) couldn’t support a complete restoration for such a noble purpose? Maybe it has more to do with the egos of those involved including the archictects than with money.

PAULB on February 4, 2004 at 6:34 am

here’s a new idea……………..BE GRATEFUL……a long way from the commonsense and good manners of another decade………perhaps all the moaners of this site might ask themselves:
‘how much in cold hard cash did they contribute to what they are complaining about…… eh?

Gregg on February 4, 2004 at 2:37 am

View link

RayKaufman on January 31, 2004 at 4:25 pm

The Egytian’s makeover is not so much “restoration” as it is “adaptive reuse,” and a very sensitive one at that. I don’t believe anyone living in L.A., with knowledge of the available alternatives for this theatre, begrudge the American Cinemateque in any way. In fact, too many historic or preservation minded organizations in this country don’t understand that in order to make their efforts viable, the end result must be monetarily feasible. Otherwise, these grand old dammes are left as show pieces only, a “museum piece” that just doesn’t work or warrant the huge investment to save.

What the Cinemateque accomplished was actually quite remarkable, given the amount of money put into the project. Today, we have a major, seven-day-a-week, functioning theatre showcase, presenting restored and sometimes forgotten films.

I have to disagree with another, previous post here, that the Northridge quake had something to do with this re-do. The steel tubing now running the length of the walls, are to support rolling speaker panels to present film in surround.

VincentParisi on January 16, 2004 at 9:03 pm

What is the current screen size?
At 733 seats it’s about the size of the auditorium at my high school.
This is a restored LA movie palace and one of the most famous? The American Cinemateque obviously doesn’t know squat about film showmanship or 70mm film presentation. Does anybody? I always wanted to go there but now it seems as though it would be major disappointment.

jhimom on December 8, 2003 at 5:43 pm

Box employees union is looking for info on roadshow movie houses of the 50’s and 60’s. If you can help, e-mail Barbara at

sdoerr on November 28, 2003 at 7:12 pm

Wow! It would be nice to check out this! I love the Egyptian deco!

William on November 11, 2003 at 8:43 pm

The walls of the auditorium were of the same faux-stone as the exterior, with bas-relief sculptures of Egyptian figures carved into the stone. Unfortunately, all of this detail has been covered over with sound absorbing tiles. The ceiling of the auditorium was atmosphic, meant to evoke the feeling of being in a temple courtyard at night. It is painted a deep blue, and if you look closely you can still see the gold stars painted on this fiels of blue. The real glory of the auditorium was the front proscenium area. The detail here began with elaborately painted columns rising from the orchestra pit. Between the two columns on each side of the pit was a large Sphinx figure on a pedestal. Above the columns were horizontal stepped beams rising toward the center of the proscenium, again with incredibly detailed hieroglyphic designs. This was further topped by the gold scarab and six golden swans which are still visible today. Unfortunately, except for the scarab and the sunburst above, all of the proscenium detailed was removed in 1969 when the proscenium was widened for the installation of a Dimension-150 screen.
Today, the ceiling sunburst is the most arresting detail in the auditorium. This cast plaster sunburst radiates out from the top of the proscenium, backlit by hidden bulbs which shine through the open grillwork. Like the Chinese, this pierced grill served not only as decoration, but also as the mouthpiece of the Wurlitzer. The pipes of the Wurlitzer pipe organ were housed in two large rooms located in the ceiling above the orchestra pit. These rooms opened onto the small attic area above the sunburst. The curved ceiling of this area directed the sound through the sunburst into the auditorium.
The long run policy continued at the Egyptian until July 1927, shortly after the opening of Grauman’s Chinese Theatre a few blocks away. During the 30’s-40’s the theatre was operated by Fox West Coast Theatres. In 1949 the theatre was acquired by United Artists chain and was extensively remodeled. The entrance with a canopy that represented the Nile River and other alterations took place.
The theatre ran first run policy day-and-date with UA’s downtown house. The long run policy was revived to some extent into the 70’s when Roadshow pictures ran for many months at the Egyptian.
During the 1969 remodel, United Artists closed the theatre briefly, jackhammered out most of the proscenium, the orchestra pit and the stage floor in order to install a Dimension-150 screen equal in size to that of the Cinerama Dome and the Chinese. Much of the unique charm of the auditorium was lost in this insensitive remodel. The screen and speakers now extend nearly to the back wall of the stage, which originally was 30 feet deep and 75 feet from side to side. The D-150 screen was around 90 feet wide.

William on November 11, 2003 at 8:05 pm

The 1922 Egyptian was Sid Grauman’s first Hollywood venture outside of the downtown Los Angeles area. It was also the first major movie palace built in Hollywood, and signaled the begining of Hollywood Boulevard as a first-run rival to the downtown houses. When the theatre was announced in September 1920, it was described as Spanish inside and out, with red tile roof and archways. By the time final plans were drafted, an Egyptian craze had begun to sweep Los Angeles, and Grauman was only too happy to jump aboard. The completed theatre, opened on October 18, 1922 with Douglas Fairbanks picture “Robin Hood” and a stage prologue featuring many costumes from the movie. Grauman had already shown an interest in middle eastern themes with the imposing faux stone interior of the Million Dollar and the remodel of the Rialto in a Persian or Byzantine style. He was also planning the downtown Metropolitan Theatre at the same time the Egyptian was being built, and the Metropolitan was probably the most eclectic and stylized of his theatres. In comparison, the Egyptian is a much purer design, probably owing to the limitations of its name as well as the fact that the architect of his other three theatres, William Lee Woolett, was not chosen for the Egyptian. Instead, Grauman called upon the building firm of Meyer and Holler. They produced a design which was unprecedented for a major theatre. Instead of the usual practice of entering the lobby directly from the street under an overhanging marquee, the Egyptian had an open-air forecourt 160 feet long and 45 feet wide lined with shops on one side.
From there, patrons entered a foyer fronted by huge columns reminiscent of an Egyptian temple. The box office was located here, and patrons could purchase advance tickets for either of the two performances each day. All seats were reserved and could be purchased at the box office, by mail or at Baker Brothers downtown store. Grauman proved with this theatre that he could be successful with only two performances per day by charging the prices of legit theatres, offering a film and a stage show, and running a picture on an exlusive basis for many months. “Robin Hood” ran at the Egyptian from October 18, 1922 until the first week of April 1923.

The below description of the theatre, is what it looked like during the theatres golden era.
In keeping with the style of an Egyptian temple, the exterior was very imposing, with little ornamentation. The outside faux-stone wall were a warm, dusty pink, with a few hieroglyphic-style paintings. The interior of the auditorium was where Grauman let the Egyptian style run wild. Like the Chinese, when one enters the auditorium there seems to be a balcony overhead. However, it is only the old projection booth and private boxes, since the theatre never had a balcony. The ceiling of this under-balcony area is still decorated with some of the original stencil painting.

jerryhollywoodnobody on November 8, 2003 at 3:00 pm

cinematreasuresm is a very good website but among missing topics is a section on screen size! Where are the biggest size screens?

bruceanthony on November 8, 2003 at 1:58 am

The restoration of this theatre doesn’t even come close to what this theatre looked like even in the 60’s. The earthquake is no excuse on how this theatre looks today. The theatre looks the way it looks because American Cinematheque thought this would be hip and the cutting edge in cinema presentation and sound. They got what they wanted because the presentation and sound is excellent but the auditorium is boring. I believe 6 million was spent on both The Chinese restoration and The El Capitan. The Pantages cost between 10-12 million. The Downtown Orpheum according to sources cost around 4 million for its restoration. I have been told the Egyptian could be returned to its original state. I love the programing and I love what American Cinematheque stands for but I am not in love with the way the theatre looks it was a major letdown. brucec

edward on October 22, 2003 at 9:08 am

Due to significant damage from the1994 Northridge earthquake and vandalism, the auditorium of the Egyptiam required major rehabilitation. The steel structure now seen in the auditorium is required to reinforce the building structure. What was left of the original auditorium decor was saved and restored. The additions of the late 50’s (in particular the marquee) were demolished and the courtyard restored. Perhaps not an accurate restoration of the original, but a successful renovation by the American Cinematheque of a neglected Hollywood movie palace.

bruceanthony on October 22, 2003 at 1:28 am

I saw many films at the Egyptian through the years. Im glad the theatre has been preserved but I am dissapointed in the renovation for the amount of money spent. The renovation at the Chinese is far superior. The best seat in the house is in the new balcony. I have been around the world and have seen restoration where new meets old done with more sensitivity and a lot less money. I am happy with the programming that has been brought to the Egyptian. Bruce

Senorsock on January 23, 2003 at 8:32 pm

I suppose this is better than no Egyptian at all. They tore up the front of the house and made the auditorium much shorter to accommodate a larger lobby. Rather then renovate, they built a new theater within the old one. It’s disappointing at best.

William on October 10, 2002 at 11:34 am

When the Egyptian open it seated 1771 people. During the 30’s-late 40’s, The Egyptian was operated by Fox West Coast Theatres. The theatre was reseated around 1947-48 , this reduced the seating to 1538 people. During the 40’s to early 60’s, this was MGM’s showcase house in Hollywood. Also during that time the Egyptian theatre installed the TODD-AO film system. For the Roadshow opening of “OKLAHOMA”. Other Roadshow films shown at the Egyptian were “Ben-Hur”, “Mutiny on the Bounty”, “My Fair Lady” (which ran for 2 years), “Funny Girl” (which was the last to run). In the late 60’s the Egyptian installed a D150 film projection system for the opening of “Patton”, But “Patton” opened over at the Pacific’s Beverly Hill’s theatre (which was the old Warner Beverly Hills). During the 60’s, till the theatre closed it was run by United Artists theatres. During that time UA made a twin theatre out of a store just to the east side of the theatre. During the 70’s-90’s, the Egyptian was the showcase house for 20th Century Fox Pictures. Today American Cinematheque has returned the Egyptian back to the style and respect, these movie palaces should have in every city. No matter how big or how small. Now the next house to restore is the old Warner Theatre in Hollywood. If you loved what they did to the Egyptian, then the Warner/Pacific will blow you away. It been 24 years since the Pacific covered and redraped that house.

TomDavis on June 17, 2001 at 4:41 pm

I attended the world premier of “Ben-Hur” at The Egyptian.

gvg3 on February 22, 2001 at 3:20 pm

What a Beautiful Theater. Now this is how I would love to watch todays movies! The old with the new! Can’t beat that, lets go to the Movies!