Palladium Times Square

1515 Broadway,
New York, NY 10036

Unfavorite 32 people favorited this theater

Showing 326 - 350 of 573 comments

AndyT
AndyT on July 8, 2004 at 8:30 am

(split comment from above —– sorry)… . as long as we define success as something realistic. The only real hope in saving the treasures is a few … here and there … as examples. We are highly unlikely to see a huge glitzy cinema in a city center playing great films to thousands of moviegoers. It’s just a different world —– complete with the idiots running the multiplexes. By the way, I’ll still be there —– all the screens in all the multiplexes are larger than anything I can have at home. The sound is better and it gets me out of the house.

umbaba
umbaba on July 7, 2004 at 5:57 am

Re: AndyT’s statement.

While there are sound business reasons why theaters are run by cashcows and not people who treasure the moviegoing experience, it doesn’t mean we have to like it.

For you to say we our all the reasons why theaters do what they do. yes , I agree. But, to think about, the reason we all stopped going to the theaters and stayed home and watched home video is because the theaters gradually declined in their quality. I’m not just talking about the movies. There were alot of bad films in the 40’s, 50’s, 70’s etc. But theaters,are run by idiots. That is Bad Business. When you pay admission, you expect a quality product. So yes, after you shelled out money to get a bad product (meaning theater quality) you decide to stop coming.

How bout starting a NEW chat as to why we all stopped going to the theaters. What we all wax on about here Andy, is the time when theaters were run by theater people. My first job was an usher in the 70’s. I had to stand a post, chase out smokers, keep the noisemakers quiet and makesure the film was always a quality showing. There wasn’t an out=of-focus, poorframed, un-climated controlled film on my watch.

Today. you leave your seat (missing 5 minutes of the flick) to walk across a multiplex city to flag down some kid to tell the asleep projectionist to frame the friggin film. I don’t pay for that, nor should anyone.

You know Andy? “If you build it they will come”…they haven’t, but we still do cause we have nothing else. So we bitch and moan on this site about the way things are done. The right way. Unfortunately (and this is where I see your point)the right way doesn’t put money in wallets, especially when the way things are done today is…the wrong way.

IanJudge
IanJudge on July 6, 2004 at 7:45 pm

I think that the skill of presentation has certainly been lost in the the new era, and curtains are just one example, nevermind having the picture in frame and focused. As far as the slides and advertisements though, they are such an easy source of revenue for a theater that there is too much of a temptation. Especially for a neighborhood theater! My theater has slides and we will soon be getting the rolling stock (as the ads are called) and believe me, I wish we didn’t have to do this, but as a second-run venue, we need the income! As Andy said above, I myself have so many customers that ‘love’ the theater but the exclamation of love is so often followed by “I haven’t been here for years”. We are totally at the mercy of the film distributors and the first run theaters. We recently screened “Grapes of Wrath” with two classic cartoons as part of our 90th anniversary celebration, in our classic theater. We only charged a dollar (!!!), got some free press, put out ads, and still only got about 200 people! Print rental was $275, plus shipping, publicity, etc. And don’t get me started about the quality of the print they sent out, P.U. But regardless of even that, it was still fun. Fun but not profitable! You do the math! It is incredibly difficult to operate a theater today.

Mikeoaklandpark
Mikeoaklandpark on July 6, 2004 at 1:36 pm

Sorry about the spaces and typo’s. I tried to preview what I was sending and it only messed it up.

Mikeoaklandpark
Mikeoaklandpark on July 6, 2004 at 1:35 pm

I agree with the comments about theaters using curtains and about AMC theaters. We don’t have any AMC here in Asheville, NC and I am glad becuase all there commercials really suck. We have AMC in Ft. Lauderdale, but don’t go there very often. In Ft.Lauderdale, we have an independant chain called Sunrise Cinemas. (www.sunrisecinemas.com)
Even though they still use slides, the theaters are great. They still use real butter on popcorn which brings me back to a child.Vito broght me back to my childhood when he mentioned about the use of the curtains in the 60’s. I rememebr that they closed the curtains after the toons and previews and being fascinated by not
being able to see the masking move. In those days most theaters had that opened across and also masking that came down when a film was
shown in cinemascope.

YMike
YMike on July 6, 2004 at 10:55 am

The AMC Empire on 42st does the same thing. Slide shows, rock music and lots of commercials! The way they raise the ticket prices every 6 months (The AMC is now $10.50) you would think they could stop playing the same irratating commercials.

moviebluedog
moviebluedog on July 6, 2004 at 10:09 am

The lack of curtain presentation has certainly degraded the filmgoing experience, in my opinion. The use of curtains adds a sense, at least for me, of anticipation. When is the show going to begin? I hope the movie is going to be good. Is the movie going to be shown on a wide screen or a little screen (as I used to think as a kid.) It can also make a mediocre theater seem more grand than it really is.

Slideshows and “radio theater networks” have really helped degrade the movie experience. My earliest memory of this is from going to any AMC theater around Southern California. The theater seemed cheap compared to the luxury theaters around my area. Yet, they charged almost the same ticket price for a movie. I would walk into a tiny auditorium and be greeted by slides of local businesses. Then came the radio networks playing songs you could hear at almost any moment on your car radio—for free. Then not to mention the ads for the Los Angeles Times.

Vito, you made a good point about the curtain presentation. Showmanship. That’s what makes going to the movies even more special. I credit projectionists who can make the show great.

AndyT
AndyT on July 6, 2004 at 10:01 am

(Heavy Sigh). I always feel like the bad guy who attempts to introduce a reality check into the conversation. Please understand that I love old (and big, and single-screeen and neighborhood) theaters as much as everyone, but I also understand the realities. So often on this wonderful site I see comments such as “I was only there once” or “Maybe I should go take a look before they close it down.” The reality is that there are rock-solid business reasons that we have lost these treasures. Everything from television to video to no parking to no maintenance to changing cities and horrible maintenance. But it’s good to remember that all of us are part of the reason for the changes. We stay home and watch TV —– we move to the suburbs —– we sit in front of our computers bemoaning the changes. Yes, we ought to work to save history, but it does no good to criticize business for not keeping a 2,000-seat theater open for 20 of us to watch a film. And it does no good to criticize today’s non-filmgoers or (worse) filmgoers for their habits.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on July 6, 2004 at 8:11 am

Vito: thanks for always putting on the best possible show at the theaters you worked in. Wouldn’t it be great if today’s theater owners and projectionists showed the same kind of dedication that you did?

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on July 6, 2004 at 7:39 am

I agree with YankeeMike, especially if they pay tribute to the height of this theater’s glory days and show the original “Star Wars”.

YMike
YMike on July 6, 2004 at 5:24 am

Saw Spider-Man 2 at this theatre yesterday. Will really miss that big red curtain that openend and closed before and after the show. Much better than seeing a slideshow. I hope something else plays there before Aug. 5 so I can make one more trip to this great theatre.

Vito
Vito on July 6, 2004 at 4:20 am

Bill’s comment said it well. Curtains, missing now from our theatres, for me added to the granduer of the movie going experience. When I worked as a projectionist during the 50s and 60s, we always closed the curtains at the end of whatever preceeded the main feature, (cartoon, tralilers etc), and reopened them at the start of the feature, most imes the stage lights were also raised and then lowered again. THAT was showmanship. The showing of a white screen was not permitted, as well as showing the screen masking moving going from one format to another, it was timed so that the curtains hid the movement of the masking. The audience never saw the masking move or a white (blank)screen.In addition the curtains had to be timed, thru the use of a cue mark on the film, to be fully closed at the same moment the movie faded out.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on July 5, 2004 at 7:47 pm

On Saturday morning I went to the Astor Plaza for what looks like the last time, to see Spider-Man 2. I sat in the balcony to get the full effect of that huge expanse of seats in front of me. And when the credits were over, I stayed to watch the curtains close on the last big single-theater screen in Times Square. It was as if the curtains were closing on a part of New York movie history. Now the Ziegfeld is literally the last of a dying breed, and more precious than ever.

umbaba
umbaba on July 5, 2004 at 5:55 am

We all think alike here…but unfortunately guys, we arethe minority…Why don’t they build there office buildings elsewhere??? We are dealing with business people who care nothing about old theaters, The Astor Plaza, Ziegfeld, etc. They will build cruddy multiplex after multiplex, if it means getting butts in the seats to make the almighty dollar…no matter how many crappy films there are out there.

Aside from the execs screwing everything up…have you ever talked to patrons themselves….they could care less…most don’t know the difference between 70MM and VHS slowspeed playback…they don’t care,just show the flick and let me eat my 8 dollar popcorn is their motto. Why does Scooby Doo make 50 million opening weekend??? Because a family of 4 will spend $9 admission plus $30 for all the snacks. That’s what these businessmen care about. Not whether the curtain opens, or what frame it is shown in or how many FPS. or Dolby, DTS, 6-Track or single speaker mono. Just see the movie, eat your friggin pocorn, then get out and make room for the next crowd.

The only great theater that would come , is if we all here opened one and ran it ourselves. But, we’d probably go out of business because let’s face it….how many shows of Around the World in 80 days in 70MM would be profitiable anyway after 1 show.

Passion and love for movies is great, we all have it, but, unfortunately the almighty dollar would beat us down….which once again is why all these great theaters will close so the teens could have another haven of small minded ignorance to drain cash out of.

It’s sad. But regardless, my passion is still there . I guess I’ll have to keep it there. Right now on TV they’re raving about Spiderman2 (look at the money it made) how real the effects were (are they kidding)In a month, it’s yesterday’s news, making room for the next one, by Thanksgiving it’s on DVD. Cash cash cash. 30 years from now, I doubt that there’ll be a younger version of us here, pushing for a 35MM re-release.

Keep the faith guys.
Rhett

br91975
br91975 on July 4, 2004 at 11:16 pm

Mann Theatres is currently headquartered in Colorado. I believe the chain is 50-50 owned by Paramount and Warner Bros., although I could be wrong…

moviebluedog
moviebluedog on July 4, 2004 at 12:38 pm

Warren wrote: Why can’t they build theatres along with the office buildings?

I believe the National General/Mann National (now Good Morning America’s Times Square office) was built as a part of an office development, too.

moviebluedog
moviebluedog on July 3, 2004 at 11:07 am

Dang typo again! The last sentence should read “crackerbox,” not crackbox! :) I need my coffee.

moviebluedog
moviebluedog on July 3, 2004 at 11:05 am

Dang typo! The “We also had the sister theater to ‘entury Plaza’” paragraph should read “We also had the sister theater to Century Plaza.”

moviebluedog
moviebluedog on July 3, 2004 at 11:01 am

It’s truly sad that major companies like Viacom or ABC/Disney can’t pick a different location to build their offices. Why must great movie theaters be picked on? Probably the size of the building, but there must be a hundred different places to put their offices in Manhattan.

We just recently (from what I’ve heard) lost the Century Plaza Theaters in Century City (Los Angeles) to a major office building. The Shubert Theater (live theater) was also taken in the demolition. The new office building will house the new headquarters for CAA.

The Century Plaza was a great theater. Though I had not been to the theater before one of the two original auditoriums was split (though actually nicely done), it was a nice theater with great projection, comfortable seats and excellent HPS-4000 Sound. From what I hear, Astor Plaza is very similar in design.

We also had the sister theater to the entury Plaza, Orange City Center. This was originally a two screener that featured 70mm projection. This is where I saw “Star Wars” in 1977. In 1985, the main large theater was split into three screens. The end result were two dinky auditoriums and a main auditorium with terrible sightlines.

I know that some feel that so-called “luxury” theaters built after the golden age of the movie palaces pale in comparison, but I feel that they were nice, too. You got a fairly large auditorium with state-of-the-art projection and sound (which I still think trumps today’s current “state-of-the-art” presentation for the most part). True, these kind of theaters weren’t always as ornate as their older siblings, but you normally got a much better presentation than almost any theater around town.

Today, almost every movie presentation (if you can call it that anymore) and almost every megaplex is built from a cookie cutter. I kind of crack up at some new theaters that build “historical” marquees above their auditorium entrances and name certain auditoriums after classic and demolished movie theaters. Can you imagine 30-50 years from now going to a movie complex and seeing a fake marquee for the auditorium that says “AMC Empire 30 minus 29,” or “Crackerbox Auditorium: This auditorium is patterned after the classic crackbox stadium auditoriums of the mid-late 90’s. Enjoy the show.”

umbaba
umbaba on July 3, 2004 at 7:36 am

Vincent…..I’m IN. A Widescreen film club…OK, so how about some kind of outline/ideas to get it started and what is the purpose…everyone here can have input!!!

Re: Aug. 5th. I guess it’s time to get to the Astor with our cameras and say goodbye.

Shade
Shade on July 3, 2004 at 1:44 am

August 5th is the last day.

I’ve been going here for every film since Van Helsing since I heard the news. Spider-Man 2 was fun with the audience. I’ve been spending some time looking around the theater.

So it’s definitely August 5th, according to the staff there. That’s less than a month. Most likely Spider-Man will still be there and there will be one final show, and then it’s gone. One of the last two Times Square theaters, and one of the last two large single-screen theaters left in Manhattan.

A sad day in New York it will be.

bruceanthony
bruceanthony on June 18, 2004 at 10:57 pm

I thought Hello Dolly was a flawed film but I still liked it on the Big Screen. I saw it in 1969 at Grauman’s Chinese. The movie cost 26 million back in 1969 the most expensive Musical up to that time. The Production Values were great and the Hello Dolly Street set at 20Th Century-Fox was one of the largest ever built. The movie was nominated for Best Picture but lost to Midnight Cowboy which reprsented the new Hollywood.brucec

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on June 18, 2004 at 2:04 pm

I don’t like the movie Dolly very much (I wish Donen had directed it. Kelly wasn’t much good by himself as a director) but the production design is stupendous. Yes seeing a movie in 70mm makes a helluva difference.

For you New Yorkers reading this site how about starting a widescreen film club. What do you guys and gals think? This way even recent widescreen films would not be consigned to DVDs(and whatever comes next) for ever.
Our Mottos
SIZE DOES MATTER
1:35 Take it Away!
3 Strip Cinerama Lives!
There’s 70mm In Your Future