Angelika 57

225 W. 57th Street,
New York, NY 10019

Unfavorite 8 people favorited this theater

Showing 26 - 50 of 69 comments

zedcudna
zedcudna on March 31, 2007 at 3:29 pm

Right On, Warren! I’ve also found the recent postings here stupid and pointless, and I’ve seen this happen before with this crew. Bryan Killian and his merry band of girlfriend pranksters descended on the message board of my boyfriend’s dog grooming website. They degraded everyone, including my boyfriend’s shitzu. My boyfriend was in tears for a week! Apparently, they get their kicks spreading their lame brand of absurdist humor. The sooner we, as right-thinking members, shun these cretins, the sooner we can get back to trusting the veracity of what we read on the internet. And by the way, you’re not boring, Warren. You’re completely delightful, Darling.

bryankillian
bryankillian on March 30, 2007 at 8:47 pm

LynnZZZ and Wanda Hickey are two separate and distinct women I know well. I don’t understand the actions taken by Warren to remove them, even if he thought they were the same person. Their contributions here added solely needed humor and energy to the depressing topic of demolished movie theatres. I strongly urge the moderator to reinstate them, but I guess we’ll see the Lincoln Art Theatre rebuilt before that happens.

Warren, enjoy the site, but maybe you should confine yourself to the pages of some nice mid-western, red-state movie theaters, where the range of thought is limited. Leave the New York theatres to those of us who appreciate free, raucous, and diverse thoughts, well expressed. “Excelsior, You Fathead!”

billyarnell
billyarnell on March 30, 2007 at 7:35 pm

I must agree with you, Frederique. I loved their comments here. Wanda Hickey’s first contribution, the meditation on the Lincoln Art and the past, was poetic and spoke more eloquently than Warren and all his dreary facts ever could. God help us if we leave the determination of what is acceptable discourse on this site to Warren and his “moderator” storm troopers.

FrederiqueSY
FrederiqueSY on March 30, 2007 at 6:56 pm

I question Warren’s sincerity here. I know LynnZZZ and Wanda Hickey, and they were two different contributors to this wonderful page on this wonderful site. They were lively, humorous, and a lot of fun. Warren, on the other hand, forgive me, I find to be a self-important bore. I’m sorry, but may I speak my mind here? Maybe Warren had them removed because he doesn’t like women.

deleted user
[Deleted] on March 30, 2007 at 5:06 pm

Illegal? Ohmygosh, Linsey, we better get a good lawyer. What are you wearing to the trial? What Linsey said is true, we’re two very different women, but we both dislike supercilious prigs.

Now with that properly dispatched, I’d like to expand Bryan’s plaintive search for the Lincoln Art’s bust of Lincoln with a shout-out to see if anyone knows what happened to the paper towel dispenser from the ladies room? (It’s just a joke, Warren. You must know what tongue-in-cheek means, my dear.)

deleted user
[Deleted] on March 30, 2007 at 3:48 pm

I’m here on topic, talking about the Lincoln Art, having a little fun, Warren. Lighten-up, you take yourself way too seriously! BTW, I’m a singular female person and not Wanda Hickey, however we’re both friends of Bryan K. who posted here. We’re all fans of the 60’s-70’s and actually went to all the 57th Street theatres of that era. “Wanda Hickey” is a character in the early 70’s Jean Shepherd book, which is why I quoted “Excelsior, you fathead!,” a famous Shepherd saying. It’s all a reference to the era we’re talking about. Now will the Moderator please do something to improve Warren’s disposition?

deleted user
[Deleted] on March 29, 2007 at 8:03 pm

The hobgoblin of little minds, “Wanda.”

deleted user
[Deleted] on March 29, 2007 at 7:35 pm

Actually, the correct spelling is “Excelsior you fathead!” you fathead. And Gerald spells his name with a “G” so address him as “Gerry,” as in the Pacemakers.

deleted user
[Deleted] on March 29, 2007 at 7:20 pm

How dare you wave your movie-going credentials at me! I’ll have you know Bryan and I saw “Let’s Scare Jessica To Death” in a 1966 Buick at the Bay Shore Drive-In. Top that, Jerry. And another thing, why don’t you call that pencil-neck administrator and give him a piece of your mind. You do have the power, it’s called a backbone emboldened by the righteousness and integrity of your work! Get on it! To quote the late great Shep, “Excelcior, you fathead!” (That’s for you, Wanda.) And another thing, we all know The Lincoln Art Theatre went through a degrading period where it was a venue for porn, but do we really have to keep reminding ourselves of this ignominious period with tacky comments like the one above me?

Paul Noble
Paul Noble on March 26, 2007 at 5:22 am

The bust of Lincoln in the lobby wore a blindfold when the Lincoln Art presented hard-core porn.

Gerald A. DeLuca
Gerald A. DeLuca on March 26, 2007 at 2:37 am

LynnZZZ, request an administrator to change the name. I have no such power. It was always the Lincoln Art to me too since I went there in the 1960s and after to see films like Luciano Salce’s The Fascist and Jiri Weiss' Sweet Light in a Dark Room and Fellini’s The Clowns.

deleted user
[Deleted] on March 25, 2007 at 5:22 pm

Got it, Bry-guy. Didn’t mean to scare anyone, just a little message board theater, playing the Manhattan nut-job who just read “The Denial of Death.” Sorry about using you name. Good luck with the hunt for the Lincoln Art’s Lincoln, I’ll keep my eyes peeled. You’re Gggrreeaat! (I should have referenced Frosted Flakes instead of Captain Crunch, huh?) Hey, Gerald A. DeLuca, change the heading to the Lincoln Art Theatre! It was the Angelika 57 for ten minutes, c'mon, get with it!

bryankillian
bryankillian on March 25, 2007 at 12:49 pm

Let me jump in here, Lynn, before you scare any more readers. Your tongue-in-cheek sarcasm isn’t translating well as written website comments. Fellow readers, she’s writing with a wink and a smile, solely intended to yank my crank. She’s a complete jerk for inserting my last name, but not as evil or glum as she sounds. “Wanda,” appreciate your username and “analysis,” also taken in good humor, I think. Anyway, please call, to catch up. “West” the same, how r ya?

OK, aside from the existential essays, I’m still interested in what happened to the bust of Lincoln from this theatre, anyone know? Not a life-or-death inquest, just idle curiosity.

Al Alvarez
Al Alvarez on March 25, 2007 at 9:42 am

Wow! What a tragedy it must be to spend this short lifespan inside that head.

deleted user
[Deleted] on March 25, 2007 at 9:17 am

Blathering on about meaningless pieces of the past is just misplaced anxiety about our own mortality. That’s all this website represents, just nostalgia run amok. Even the “great” Bryan Killian, in his heart of hearts, knows this truth. By the way, Bryan’s favorite film isn’t any of that Chaplin garbage, it’s “Cinema Paradiso.” Yeah, about an old Italian movie theater that gets demo’d. So typical. Hey, Bryan, maybe they never removed the Lincoln statue and it remains where it stood, now in the supermarket which replaced the Lincoln Art. Check isle 5 behind the Doritos and the Captain Crunch. Look! There he is! And with the 1969 Milk Duds still stuck to his head! Happy now? “Life is the temporary victory over the causes which induce death.” Maybe there are more important things to attend in the short time we’re here, Bry?

deleted user
[Deleted] on March 25, 2007 at 7:31 am

Knowing Bryan Killian as I do, the Lincoln statue represents a treasured memory of the happier past, where his thoughts reside most of the time. Think of “Rosebud” from “Citizen Kane” times ten. Also, his identification with Charlie Chaplin, the perennial outsider looking in, a tramp battling over-powering societal forces, never quite getting the girl he loves, stifling a tear before the jaunty walk alone into the sunset, this is quintessentially him. Alas, I really like the guy and was curious to find out what he’s up to, so I googled to this God-forsaken page. (This is the only reference to you, Bryan, on the net, how is that possible?) I must mention, Bryan, I went to see “The Kid” at the Lincoln Art in the early 70’s, when I was young and New York was “Fun City” and 57th Street was alive. God, the past was so beautiful! I laughed my head off (sorry Mr.Lincoln), and cried at the end. So I ask all you concerned about old movie theaters, and their ultimate demolition in the final scene, isn’t that how life goes? Bryan used to say, “Big ha-ha always leads to big boo-hoo. You had that right, BK!

JimRyan
JimRyan on March 24, 2007 at 11:37 am

I was friends with Bryan Killian when I was a kid—from Long Island and St. Mary’s—that Bryan Killian? Yeah Lynn, a panick. Funny, cause we went to this theater together with his grandmother in the late 60s or early 70s-we were kids out on the big town! I remember he told me that the statue was Lincoln’s actual head which they removed after his death and cast in iron. I was impressed. Funny he’s thinking about that statue all thse years later, but I guess I am too. So what did happen to it? ( a la Maltese Falcon). If it’s found with petrified candy stuck to it, I must confess, Bryan and I dropped a barrage of half- melted Milk Duds from the balcony staircase which wrapped around poor old Abe.

deleted user
[Deleted] on March 11, 2007 at 11:28 am

Is this what has become of the great Bryan Killian? Sifting through the ruins of some long ago movie theatre muttering trivia absolutely no one cares about. Blah, blah blah Chaplin, Chaplin?! Get that fine mind into this century, c'mon New York needs you man, you were a legend! And no, we don’t know what happened to Lincoln’s head, have you checked the Lincoln Memorial gift shop?

beaker
beaker on February 17, 2007 at 2:45 pm

The Lincoln Art Theatre was the Manhattan venue for the theatrical re-release of Charlie Chaplin’s greatest films in the early 1970’s. Chaplin’s films, such as “The Kid,” “City Lights,” “Modern Times,” and “The Great Dictator,” were very popular at the Lincoln Art. The interest generated by these film showings helped pave the way for Chaplin’s return to the United States in 1972, after many years of exile in Switzerland. Chaplin was honored in Hollywood with a special Academy Award, and here in Manhattan at Lincoln Center, but it was the Lincoln Art Theatre which honored Chaplin best by extensively showing his great films.

One question: Does anyone know what has happened to the bust of Lincoln prominently displayed in the Lincoln Art’s lobby?

RobertR
RobertR on October 4, 2006 at 7:13 am

Check out the X rated film at the Lincoln Art capitalizing on the nostalgia craze of American Graffiti & Happy Days.
View link

irajoel
irajoel on July 23, 2006 at 10:03 am

You can view some nice images of movie material here. Most are souvnir programs. You
http://s110.photobucket.com/albums/n94/irajoel/

you can also view my entire inventory for sale at
www.cinemagebooks.com
email me at

Al Alvarez
Al Alvarez on April 29, 2006 at 1:59 am

From the NY Times:

The Lincoln Art opened in July 1964 as an outlet for Joseph E. Levine’s Emabssy Pictures. Levine also owned the Festival at the time.

Opening night patrons in to see CARTOUCHE! received portraits of Abraham Lincoln. Seat count was placed at 571.

Construction: William Ely Kohn (architect?)
Color schemes- green and black in the looby, red and black in the auditorium
Interior decor by Yale R. Burge, Inc.
General contractor: Lasberg, Inc.
Focal points include large prints of Lincoln at the White House and at his inaugural parade.

“The opening of the new Lincoln Art theatre technically may be listed as historic. The intimate showcase is the newest to grace a mid-manhattan already bristling with new or fairly new miniature film palaces.”

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on February 27, 2006 at 4:13 am

Thanks, Warren. I was in this one, I keep records, so I know where I was, but my recollection as to the news article could be inaccurate. I didn’t save the article. The suggestion of a stage may have been enough to, ah, suggest a stage to me.

I was never in the Little Carnegie or in the screens in the basement of Carnegie Hall.

How do you know who built it, who the architect was, etc? If you have news articles, I see some people typed them on the site, or scanned them & linked them from another site. I recently copied the opening movie review for Lamb designed Hollywood Theatre onto this site after finding the same movie on a historic photo of the Boyd. Regardless, thanks for your research.

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on February 26, 2006 at 10:39 am

I meant in the Balcony, rows of 4 seats, then 12, then 4 again.

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on February 26, 2006 at 10:38 am

Davebozooka, this theater had a balcony. When I saw a movie in 1997, the management intended the balcony to be closed, but I asked if I could sit in it, and they quickly said ok.

When it closed later in 1997, I recall reading a news article saying it opened in the 1920’s.

I have a 556 seat count, but that could be inaccurate. My seat totals may not add up, but in the balcony, I counted 7 rows of 4 seats, then 12, then 7. There was a wood rail there. I record that the orchestra had 2 sections, one of 24 rows of 11, and one of 13 rows of 5, and that the seats were numbered and red. There was a stage. There was no use of a curtain. There were no slides. I estimated the screen at about 25 feet wide, and believed it to be very well placed in the auditorium so there was a great view from the balcony. There was an old chandelier in the lobby. There was a metal stairway with a pattern that I drew looking like a cross going into a circle.

The news article indicated it had ALWAYS been a cinema since the 1920’s.