TCL Chinese Theatre

6925 Hollywood Boulevard,
Los Angeles, CA 90028

Unfavorite 159 people favorited this theater

Showing 551 - 575 of 1,670 comments

Cliffs
Cliffs on April 20, 2013 at 12:45 am

I know it’s blasphemous, but I’m not HATIN' it so far.

Chris Utley
Chris Utley on April 19, 2013 at 11:54 pm

Before and after renderings of the remodel:

http://la.curbed.com/archives/2013/04/see_the_changes_coming_soon_to_the_tcl_chinese_theatre.php

clevelandphil
clevelandphil on April 18, 2013 at 2:19 pm

Good news folks! You can see Tyler Perry movies in Imax for a nominal fee of 30 bucks.

Chris Utley
Chris Utley on April 17, 2013 at 6:52 pm

Y'all know doggone well that Disney WILL NOT allow any of their titles to play in any other Hollywood theatre not named El Capitan!

IMAX has pimped themselves so hard through their theatre retrofits that now it’s commonplace to see them bouncing multiple titles through their different theatres. In Cliff’s scenario above, Star Trek may leave Chinese when Fast and Furious 6 opens…but it would most likely continue to play at AMC Universal Citywalk and/or AMC Century 15. The addition to IMAX at Chinese gives IMAX gives them a much bigger playing field to work with: Rave & AMC Century to the west, Chinese & Citywalk to the north, and AMC Burbank to the slightly farther north. With 5 theatres to play with (and we haven’t event talked the suburbs yet), I don’t think booking will be that much of a pain for IMAX!

Cliffs
Cliffs on April 17, 2013 at 1:06 am

I think the booking rules are going to be to one of the biggest questions that needs to be answered. Don’t forget… even with the IMAX overhaul, the Chinese still has the same problem that got them into a competitive disadvantage. Outside of the main screen, they just don’t have the seat count to compete with Arclight. Arclight can open a summer tentpole in the Dome (and 3 other screens) and then move that Dome show out the next week to replace it with something else. It’s like a funnel over there and there are 15 screens that make up that funnel. By the time ‘42’ leaves there in about 4 weeks it’ll have probably seen 5 different sized theaters from about 1000 seats total first week to about 70/80 in week 4. The Chinese doesn’t have that funnel. They still won’t have the move-over screens to ensure they get every big movie.

I think the only way this works (and in an ideal world, this is the way to do it) is the Chinese is able to book “IMAX Experience” films independent of the Arclight and El Capitan. I made the point last week that I think there’s a strong case to be made that the “IMAX Experience” versions are like totally different films because they aren’t something that Arclight or El Capitan can show. They’re always listed differently on Fandango, Movie Tickets.com, and are listed separately with AMC and Regal Theaters. Arclight and El Capitan can still book the standard versions and the Chinese 6 would compete for those films as well. But most IMAX runs are only for a week or two anyway and it isn’t like the IMAX version gets ‘moved-over’ to a smaller theater or nearby IMAX when a new IMAX Experience opens. They all show Jurassic for 2 weeks, then get rid of it for Oblivion (which will play for 2 weeks) until Iron Man 3 on May 3rd plays for 2 weeks before Star Trek moves in where it’ll only get a week before Fast and Furious 6 on May 24th. This is pretty standard across all multiplex IMAX.

IF Arclight and the Chinese are allowed to co-book IMAX versus standard, this could have a really great side effect (if Arclight is smart). I’m someone who is pretty averse to 3D. I think it’s a FAR bigger distraction than it is an immersion. The thing that REALLY irritates me with 3D is the way the chains have been using their biggest and best theaters to pimp 3D at the exclusion of those who don’t want or can’t enjoy 3D. Want to see Star Trek in the Dome… better like 3D. Add to that that the Dome 3D is probably the worst in the country and it becomes infuriating that one of my favorite theaters is totally off limits unless I want to A) put up with 3D and B) put up with AWFUL 3D. BUT… If the Chinese is getting Amazing Spider-Man 2 in IMAX 3D and Arclight is getting it in standard, Arclight would be IDIOTS to try and pit the Dome 3D against IMAX 3D just a few blocks away. It may actually force them to try and regain a bit of their dignity and position themselves as the “best place to see these blockbusters in 2D,” which is something people have been complaining and begging for, only to have Arclight turn a deaf ear. In short… it may force Arclight to actually have to try and care again.

Michael Furlinger
Michael Furlinger on April 16, 2013 at 11:47 pm

Why the hell is someone’s picture with My space ???

Michael Furlinger
Michael Furlinger on April 16, 2013 at 10:28 pm

Dolby atmos is irrelevant in the issue of picture release and theatres when it comes to clearance . IMAX theatres will get pics filmed for IMAX over all competition .

Michael Furlinger
Michael Furlinger on April 16, 2013 at 10:24 pm

Howard it is unlikely , IMAX name on a theatre gives that theatre all the benefits of the name .. They have priority bookings over all competition if it is an IMAX film.

Michael Furlinger
Michael Furlinger on April 16, 2013 at 10:21 pm

Roger ,can’t agree with you —Filmmakers have almost no control were there pictures play . A picture in an IMAX release will go to the Chinese first … Period .. They will move it over to the 6 and open a new IMAX film … This is a brilliant move ..

segask
segask on April 16, 2013 at 10:04 pm

so the current THX sound system will be removed, and IMAX speakers/amplifiers will take their place?

RogerA
RogerA on April 16, 2013 at 8:22 pm

Yes I know about zones and how movies are booked into the theaters. I also know that certain studios and certain filmmakers favor certain theaters. Many of the people here seem to think IMAX will make the Chinese profitable again. We will see.

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on April 16, 2013 at 6:36 am

Since the Arclight has no Imax, could the Chinese obtain only the Imax version of a film whose non-Imax showings would be at the Arclight?

John Fink
John Fink on April 15, 2013 at 10:17 pm

RogerA – the idea of clearance is if more than one first run cinema in an area (normally 1-2 miles) exists, they will compete for films. Sometimes this zone is broken by the studio (in the case of the two megaplexes in Ontario, CA) – in other areas like NYC (obviously zones are smaller than 2 miles) certain theaters will divide bookings amongst themselves. The most obvious examples being Times Square (the Empire 25 is showing different films than EWalk across the street) and Union Square – with Cinema Village, Quad Cinema, Regal Union Square, AMC Village 7 and City Cinemas Village East 7 – all sharing, none playing the same film.

IMAX which doesn’t guarantee a movie will be a huge success, but its a competitive advantage for sure (like anything in the movie industry its based on what product is available in the market place). An IMAX screen means you’ll get that title as well as the option to show it at the other theatre (the Chinese 6) – perhaps in a variety of formats (2D, 3D, HFR 3D, etc). I believe this and Arc Light have to compete for bookings – and from my last look the Chinese was showing Tyler Perry’s latest film – a hot flick maybe for the first week but probably not packin' them in three weeks out.

RogerA
RogerA on April 14, 2013 at 1:24 pm

Dolby Atmos is a good thing. Definitely better than the standard 5.1 sound.

Giles
Giles on April 13, 2013 at 9:33 pm

well the El Cap and Dolby Theater have the upper hand in that they are both Dolby Atmos equipped, and in my opinion, sound better than standard IMAX 5.0 sound.

RogerA
RogerA on April 13, 2013 at 3:05 pm

Then they can run some one weekend wonders like G.I. Joe in IMAX.

Oh and there is spelled their Longislandmovies. There clearance makes even less sense.

Danny Baldwin
Danny Baldwin on April 13, 2013 at 3:02 pm

The LA Times article said the now standard dual Christie digital IMAX projector would be installed when it re-opens, then the theater would be the first to get laser next year.

I wonder: When a Disney title is offered in IMAX, will it play both the El Cap and the Chinese now, or just one or the other?

Giles
Giles on April 13, 2013 at 2:29 pm

there’s rumour that this will be the flagship/debut of the new Barco/Kodak laser technology that IMAX plans on installing on 4:3 AR screens.

Michael Furlinger
Michael Furlinger on April 13, 2013 at 2:12 pm

There clearance issues will be over …. Smart move ..

RogerA
RogerA on April 13, 2013 at 1:48 pm

So, they will get all the IMAX movies. If that is the solution then so be it. Clearance model what the hell is a clearance model? I Goggled clearance model. It sounds like something taught in business school. But in real life the goal is to put butts in seats. If IMAX does that then great!

As for the pixilation problem Let’s hope IMAX increases it’s resolution and frame rate, 48+fps and 8K should do it.

I saw a road show print of My Fair Lady 70mm in New York on a 100 plus foot screen and the picture was bright, sharp and clear. I could make out the fibers in the actors cloths. Certainly with today’s technology we can do as good if not better than that.

John Fink
John Fink on April 13, 2013 at 11:51 am

Installing an IMAX is one way to ensure top quality bookings for this theater and the next-door 6-plex: it’s a clearance model – when an IMAX is attached to a theatre they get whatever IMAX feature is out (which is normally a hot movie). I’m thinking this one will get laser projection as a dirty little secret I ran across in my research is the 2 X 2K D-IMAX image falls apart at 6 stories (why else wouldn’t IMAX let Bill Warren build the largest IMAX screen in the world when he wanted to). I’ve seen this first hand on a native IMAX auditorium that was converted to D-IMAX, it’s about 5-6 stories and you can see pixilation from dead center in the auditorium.

RogerA
RogerA on April 12, 2013 at 9:44 pm

Besides it is a joke that the largest screen isn’t even in California or New York. Use the 120 foot screen holder that the Chinese has install a 120 foot screen and fill a 120 foot wide screen, be the worlds largest. That would be impressive.

And the base boom channel at the Chinese is lame. At one time there were 16 16" speakers. We had some base boom. I put two 2000 watt amps on those two speaker banks and got some impressive base. I ran a reel of Jurasic Park as a test for someone at Universal and they were speachless. We used to be able to blow out a match with the base channel. Not any more. Showmanship died years ago.

Danny Baldwin
Danny Baldwin on April 12, 2013 at 9:37 pm

I actually think the IMAX brand is one of the only things that will draw current audiences to the Chinese, even though it’s vastly inferior to the theater as it is now.

Michael Furlinger
Michael Furlinger on April 12, 2013 at 9:35 pm

Yes it is the draw that can save the theatre !

RogerA
RogerA on April 12, 2013 at 9:23 pm

Longislandmovies there is nothing wrong with turning a profit they are just going about it wrong. There is nothing special about an IMAX theater. Is IMAX that big of a draw that it will get a crowd into the Chinese. I hope the IMAX picture is 1:90 at least that is better than 1:34 Last time I went to the Chinese it wasn’t worth the extra expense and trouble. At least at the El Capitan the pre show alone is worth the price of a ticket. I just paid 45 bucks for a ticket to Gatsby at the Dome but that is reserved seat and an event. They will sell out that show and at $45 a head they will make a profit even if it is an open bar. Sad to say but the Chinese isn’t that special any more.