Comments from bigjoe59

Showing 601 - 625 of 784 comments

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Ziegfeld Theatre on Feb 8, 2013 at 2:41 pm

Hello-

i am certain that when the Demille was one of the premiere roadshow houses in the Times Square ares they also had “divans” listed as a section on the ticket order forms.

if i am not mistaken after the roadshow run of “Fiddle on the Roof” at the Rivoli the fall of 1971 the remaining such engagements to open in the big Times Square houses were “Nicholas and Alexandra” at the Criterion Dec. 1971 and “Man of La Mancha” Dec. 1972 at the Rivoli. also to be included is the roadshow run of “The Trojan Women” at the Fines Arts the fall of 1971.

i guess the lackluster receipts for the roadshow engagements of “Man…..” was the proverbial final nail in the coffin. the studios subsequently discontinued the policy.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Ziegfeld Theatre on Feb 5, 2013 at 4:47 pm

Hello Again-

the exclusive 1st run engagements of “Ryan’s Daughter” and “Apocalypse Now” were reserved performance engagements. for people not familiar with said runs they were similar to reserved seat engagements in that you could by tickets ahead of time but what seat you got was up in the air. for instance if such a film was quite popular and you got to the theater five minutes before the film began you were guaranteed a seat but in might be all the way in the back in the corner. i’m guessing the studios thought this type engagement up since it had way less overhead then a traditional reserved seat run. for instance you didn’t need ushers.

the first such run in Manhattan i can remember was “Fellini’s Satryricon” which opened March of 1970 at the late but great Little Carnegie.

also to put my two cents in i don’t consider the special two week engagements of “Dreamgirls” or “The Princess and the Frog” before they opened wide true reserved seat runs. so i do believe as i said in my original post that the theater’s opening film “Marooned” was the first and only traditional studio roadshow engagement it has hosted.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Ziegfeld Theatre on Feb 5, 2013 at 12:07 pm

Hello-

i likewise enjoyed seeing Les Miz at the Ziegfeld. speaking of two a day reserved seat or to use the trade term roadshow engagements.

am i correct that the only old style roadshow run the theater has had was its opening film- “Marooned”?

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Ziegfeld Theatre on Jan 6, 2013 at 1:07 pm

Hello-

in reference to Bill H.’s Jan 4th comment about the “new ticket price of $14”. the price may be new for the Ziegfeld but the Regal 42 St. and Union Square multi-plexes have been charging $14 on weekends for some time now.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Ziegfeld Theatre on Jan 3, 2013 at 3:05 pm

Hello-

it interesting even people i know who like the film if they have any negative comment per se is that they thought it was a tad long. haven’t they ever seen a stage production?

also there have been countless films in the past say 15 years that were huge box office hits and were longer than “Les Miz”. so if the only negative comment per se that people have about the film is its length i find that interesting.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Ziegfeld Theatre on Jan 2, 2013 at 5:10 pm

Hello-

i am totally confused my raysson’s comment.
at what theater or theaters are they showing the
film with overture,intermission and exit music?

its certainly not at the Ziegfeld.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Costello Theatre on Dec 13, 2012 at 12:34 pm

Hello-

i was looking at back issues of Moving Picture World on archive.org and happened upon a May issue which gave the opening date of the theater as May 20, 1914. it was built to honor star Maurice Costello. also the article gave a different address than the own stated at the top of this page.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Happy 50th, “Lawrence of Arabia” on Dec 11, 2012 at 12:23 pm

Hello-

i recently watched the new blu-ray hd disc and its a revelation both visually and audio wise. in two of the extras-a nice narrated short about the various ad campagins from its releases and in the making of doc. it is noted that almost immediately after its roadshow engagements in the U.S. started up they was a move to tweak the film. the reason given was supposed complaints from theater owners about its length and the number of showings they could schedule. now i know it was common practice to tweak a film after it finished its first run roadshow engagements and was sent to neighborhood theaters around big cities. so why were theater owners so antsy about the film’s length in its original roadshow engagements when they only ran two shows a day anyway. i can think of a number of films released on roadshow runs right before and right after LOA that were almost as long but were not tweaked till they went to neighborhood theaters. so why was LOA tweaked almost immediately after it debuted?

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Ziegfeld Theatre on Dec 1, 2012 at 8:56 am

Hello Again-

as Al A. states i guess i didn’t phrase the question correctly. i suppose i should have said what was the last exclusive 1st run engagement that the Ziegfeld had of a new film. the last exclusive engagement i can think of off the top of my head was the Harris/ Katz restoration of “Vertigo” Oct. 1996. but that was a re-issue not a new film.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Embassy 1,2,3 Theatre on Nov 26, 2012 at 12:39 pm

Hello!!!

i have been thinking about the contradiction Henderson makes in her book “42 St.”. she herself acknowledges Hammerstein’s Victoria as one of the 12 theaters built on 42 ST. between 7th and 8th Avenues. yet she says the American of 1893 built close to where the AMC Empire multi-plex is now was the first of the 12 theaters to be demolished. but the Victoria was torn down in 1915 to build the 1st Rialto movie theater which opened in 1916. the bone of contention seems to be whether the Victoria was completely torn down or if some part no matter how small was kept.

which prompts my question- does a theater have to be completely torn down to be referred to as “torn down”? i’m not quite sure what it was but some element of the Victoria must have been left up if Henderson lists the American not the Victoria as the first of the 12 theaters on the block to be “torn down”.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Ziegfeld Theatre on Nov 25, 2012 at 1:14 pm

Hello To All-

all the talk about the Ziegfeld having the chance to host an exclusive open ended engagement of a new film raises a pertinent question- i am not talking about the special exclusive two week engagements before they opened wide of “The Princess and the Frog” or “Dreamgirls”. what was the last film for which the Ziegfeld hosted an exclusive 1st run opened ended engagement?

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about TCL Chinese Theatre on Nov 9, 2012 at 4:49 pm

Hello Again-

i am totally confused now. i was under the impression that the reason Jackson shot the film at the 48 frame per second was so that even if you didn’t see it in 3-D it would look far sharper than regular 24f frames per second.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about TCL Chinese Theatre on Nov 9, 2012 at 2:31 pm

Hello From NYC-

as in L.A.in Manhattan “The Hobbit” will be playing in a number of theaters which prompts a question- will the much hyped 48 frames per second technology only be seen in the 3-D showings or will it be seen in the 2-D showings as well? the reason i ask this is i have seen very few 3-D films in which the 3-D actually amounted to much to justify the surcharge.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Palace Theatre on Nov 6, 2012 at 6:20 pm

Hello Again-

i have been under the impression for years that “Goodbye Mr. Chips” was the Palace’s last film. and that after the film’s roadshow run the Palace reverted to a legit theater and has stayed that way since the spring of 1970.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Palace Theatre on Nov 6, 2012 at 5:20 pm

Hello-

during the many times the Palace operated as as movie theater the only times i remember going there to see a film was the June 1969 roadshow re-release of “Ben-Hur” and the Nov. 1969 roadshow engagement of “Goodbye Mr. Chips”. while its not considered one of the great musicals i enjoyed GMC. i don’t know how long the film’s roadshow engagement lasted at the Palace but it was the last film to ever play the Palace. i wonder how soon after GMC’s run ended that they dismantled the film projecting equipment etc……

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Palace Theatre on Nov 5, 2012 at 4:29 pm

Hello Again-

thanks for the info. said info prompts another question. i always assumed when a film had a decent run in its original exclusive reserved seat engagement that said decent run was prompted by box office returns rather than any contractual obligation to run the film for x number of months regardless of the box office. therefore i’m hoping that the film’s 6 month run in its original reserved seat engagement was prompted by the box office.

the reason i asked the question is simple. assuming i correctly understood what i read online it appears the film’s sole exclusive first run engagement in San Francisco wasn’t even an reserved seat engagement but a two week run at the S.F.Fox.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Cinerama Dome and ArcLight Hollywood on Oct 25, 2012 at 1:44 pm

Hello From New York City-

its interesting reading the various comments about the Cinerama Dome’s reserving seats policy. my question is exactly how does it work? one of comments makes it seem as if you can reserve a particular seat you like forever and ever. but i don’t suppose you can actually do that. so if you find a particular seat just right for you how can you make sure you get it for every film you want to see at the Dome? that’s the part i’m a bit fuzzy about.

also since i;m sure the being able to reserve a seat costs more how do people feel about that? regular movies in Manhattan cost $13.50-$14 which is already way to high so who would want to pay extra?

also do people who use the Dome’s reserved seating policy do so for every film or only for films they know will have a line around the block?

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Regent Theatre on Oct 21, 2012 at 3:43 pm

in regards to AL A.’s comment of 11/15/10. the info in the intro at top is no mistake. the film “Pandora’s Box” which opened the Regent starred John Bunny and co-starred Lillian Walker as the person the title refers to.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Sutton Theater on Oct 12, 2012 at 5:32 pm

Hello to AL A.–

you certainly make a good point in your last e-mail. i’m sure for sometime after it opened at the Loew’s Capitol many screenings of the original 1968 “Plane of the Apes” especially showings on Fri.,Sat. and Sun. were close to sold out if not sold out. this relates to the point in your last e-mail~ i always wondered how the staff of the Capitol got the old audience out, cleaned the theater then got the new audience in before the next screening all in 18mins.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Sutton Theater on Oct 12, 2012 at 4:39 pm

to AL A.–

thanks for your reply to my post. interesting way of looking at the scheduling of showings.

now the lack of a concession stand in smaller art houses could certainly have accommodated faster turnover hence more showings a day. but the policy was also used in the larger movie theaters in the Times Square area. for instance on the photos page for the Loew’s Capitol there is a newspaper ad for premiere engagement of the original “Planet of the Apes” from 1968. the film is say 1hr.42mins? and the ad states the showings were scheduled every two hours starting at 10a.m.

also when “The Godfather” opened March of 1972 at the Loew’s State I and II is was scheduled every three hours and the film had a running time of 2hrs.50mins.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Sutton Theater on Oct 12, 2012 at 3:57 pm

Hello-

in the photos section i was looking at the newspaper ads for “Marty” when it first opened in 1955. i noticed something quite interesting. nowadays theater owners or exhibitors to use the correct trade term seem to schedule an inordinately large amount of times between the showings of a film. thereby getting fewer shows a day. whereas in the “Marty” ads from 1955 it appears the manager of the Sutton scheduled showings of the film with as little time between showings as he figured the staff could get he old audience out and the new audience in.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Cinerama Dome and ArcLight Hollywood on Oct 8, 2012 at 3:41 pm

Hello To C.S.Walczak-

thanks for the info. after posting the note a thought occurred to me. from its Nov.‘63 opening to the release of the last “in Cinerama” film “Krakatoa East of Java” the only theater in the
Hollywood area other than the Dome capable of showing films “in Cinerama” would have been the Warner/Pacific up on Hollywood Blvd. so with the 9? single lens Cinerama films released from '63 thru '69 plus re-issues of the original 3-strip films i figured the Dome didn’t have the time to host any other reserved seat engagements. this is especially true since when first built the Dome could only show single lens “Cinerama” films. but apparently it did find the time. interesting.

also do you know of a website that lists all the reserved seat engagements in the L.A. area from the Oct. 1955 opening of “Oklahoma” to the Dec. 1972 opening of “Man of La Mancha” after which the studios dropped the policy regardless of what the film was in(Cinerama,70MM,Panavision,35mm etc.)? thanks in advance.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Cinerama Dome and ArcLight Hollywood on Oct 8, 2012 at 1:33 pm

Hello Again From NYC-

i thank my fellow posters in L.A. for replying to my posts. i have a new question for you.

the studios dropped the use of the two a day reserved seat engagement policy after the Dec. 1972 release of “Man of La Mancha”. now the Dome opened Nov. of 1963 with “Its A Mad Mad Mad Mad World”. so in the 9 years the Dome existed while the studios were still using the policy did the theater host any reserved seat engagements of films other than those presented “in Cinerama”?

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Cinerama Dome and ArcLight Hollywood on Oct 2, 2012 at 10:48 am

Hello to J. Sittig-

i just watched the blu-ray disc of the restored remastered “This Is Cinerama”. i quite enjoyed it
and i have two questions-

1.one thing i liked about the restored remastered blu-ray disc released Sept. of ‘08 of “How The West Was Won"was that the lines between the panels were virtually eliminated. yet with TIC that was not done. might i ask why?

2.after watching the film first without the commentary i wondered why the Long Island church choir segment was in sepia rather than Technicolor as was the rest of the film. when i watched the film again with the commentary my question was answered by the fact this scene was not shot for TIC but was a test scene shot by Waller to get backing for TIC. of course the sepia isn’t changeable but couldn’t that scene have been restored/remastered a bit more so it had the sharp crisp crystal clear image of the rest of the film?

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 commented about Update on The Ziegfeld: 'The Master' doesn't help on Sep 27, 2012 at 4:31 pm

Hello- the and i mean “the problem” is that the Ziegfeld was built when they still held exclusive runs of new “big” films either or a reserved seat or continuous performance basis in one theater. i can remember many “big” films opening exclusive at the Ziegfeld with resulting lines around the blocks for weeks. but once the ear of the multiplex came about the Ziegfeld has been in a rather dicey situation. i have everything works out well in the end.