Showing 601 - 625 of 711 comments
Mansfield, but the right to build on that site was retained form Nelson-Firman. We’ll see if they grow in the AMC/Loews merger, but I doubt it, actually.
It sounds like Cinema Treasures needs to start giving out awards, maybe by region.
Maybe a Cinema Tour members choice award.
Is AMC/Loews going to have to sell off a peice of that you think? In New York they may not have a total monopoly but in Boston and Chicago they may. I wonder if we’ll be seeing Clearview Cinemas E-Walk 13 in a few months.
Strange, they were open Wednesday night. The design almost looks like a Regal Cinemas- the two new theaters (located to the right at a 90 degree angle) will be designed so that the projection booth is about 5 feet above the floor- there will be chance they can upgrade the those two new houses to Stadium Seating in the future without digging underground.
As for the closure – it was extremly cold there Wednesday night (the new bathrooms had no heat for example). I don’t know whats going on with it. I asked the ticket selller if she knew when the project would be complete she had said December was the target date but she doubts it’ll be finished in time.
Interestingly enough I asked a concession stand attendent the same thing and she didn’t know either. I then commented that “those upstairs theaters are gone” – she said “yeah, we get a lot of complains”, I then asked if her she knew what those theaters originally were for. She didn’t. I’m not blaiming her but I thought that working there those upstairs theaters would be sort of an urban legend for the employees. Guess not.
So what is the current status given the merger? Is the building being built? Will be it AMC verses being Loews. This is exciting as it will probably be the first (if not first) Loews devoloped AMC-opened theaters. Although during the crash they didn’t finish any GC theaters in progress (leaving two half-built Sundance Cinemas locations to later be devoloped as a Regal Cinemas “Movie Art” theater and The Bridge: Cinema De Lux).
I’ve been turned away from shows there- it’s a mix of location (on a busy highway), the fact theres places to shop and eat in the area, it’s an area insitution (its been there for what, like 30 years now) and movie goers from the area who formerly went to the AMC theaters at Rockaway now have their choice between Cinema 10, Cinema 12 or Mansfield – reducing the screen count to 6, and the Rockaway theaters were extremly popular, Cinema 10 is the next best choice.
By the way, is construction comming along on the Loews/AMC Rockaway or has the project been shelved due to the merger and the current state of the exhibition industry?
My point is generally an IMAX theater has to be in a metropolitan area- I’m assuming most people reading a message board dealing with a theater in North West NJ wouldn’t make the connection that Manchester, CT is 12 miles east of Hartford, so to quickly prove my point about IMAX theaters either being in large shoping centers or near/in cities its easier to say its in Hartford region. It seems like that status allows it more new toys to play with as well (they are showing Chicken Little in Disney Digital 3-D). My general point is although Cinema 10 is successful, Clearview most likely would not invest in all these extras because after everyone in Morris County has seen the new IMAX movie theres no one left. Manchester, for example has multiple colleges near it, it had the distinction of being the closest cinema to UCONN (open all year long) until this summer, as well as the city of Hartford. Succasunna just doesn’t have that population to get them in the way that those other IMAX sites do.
It happened because AMC is ultra efficiant in moving a picture around to a diffrent theater at a diffrent time, I’ve noted that. While it may apear a movie should be playing in the same theater all day (even if it apears to only be on a single screen) it’ll play in a larger house when its in a higher demand. It apears that since Andrea shows at 6:20 and 10:45 they slipped in Chicken Little at 8:45 and forgot to change over the reel.
I had remembered reading that the two new theaters would in total add 500 seats to the capacity – I’m guessing those will be large screened houses – no where though have I read that they will have stadium seating which is odd considering these are new constructions. I have my doubts about Clearview Cinemas building an IMAX theater, they are a small chain, they’ve only opened, I think two new theaters, although they have renovated all of them. Next I hope they get to Cinema 12 (the seating is 10 years old and the sound still creeps in from other theaters). Cinema 10 is constantly packed (more so now until AMC/Loews hits Rockaway) but I doubt an IMAX theater would work in that market (they ussually are in more urban markets in multiplexes – note Buckland Hills in Hartford, CT, Channelside Cinemas 9 in Clearwater, FL, City Center 15 in White Plains, NY and several others). Roxbury/Succasunna wouldn’t have the audience to suport that type of content on a week by week basis. Even if they were to convert a screen to show IMAX films (like Buckland Hills and City Center did), even if it were #5, the idea would not be accepted due to the lack of stadium seating and space needed for a giant screen. Currently the Mansfield Clearview is the multiplex (not single screen convert with balcony seating) only one in their chain with stadium seating (if you could even call it that).
The theater in general needs an upgrade. Clearview is amazing in that they can charge 9.50 without offering the same ammenties as other theaters at this price level (noteably Clifton Commons and Essex Green with their stadium seating, newer and more comfortable seats). Cinema 12’s theatres are in need of repair, ironic that they have spend so much effort on fixing up their concession stands. I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again: I spend more time in the auditirium than I do in the lobby. It’s time for Cinema 12 to get an upgrade.
Regal wasn’t thinking, they were focued on expansion, this theatre should have never been built. They did advertise it frequently when it first opened but I suspect part of the reason its doing okay now (besides being the premere Bollywood theatre in the country) is because Tunnelly Ave has seen some new devolopment over the past few years too. Regal didn’t think. National Amusements which didn’t really get caught up in the multiplex boom studies a site for years before building. Regal just wanted screen counts, as a result of those muliplexes built during the boom only 2 of the top 100 were Regals (now that number has gone up surly with the aquistion of Union Square) but Regal Cinemas was astonishingly stupid during the late 90’s. Glad this theatre and Columbia Park proved it to you.
Columbia Park is at I-495 at Kennedy Blvd, its under the Columbia Park shoping center (accessable from a ramp off Kennedy Blvd leading back on to 495.
Is Blue Back Square going to have Stadium Seating?
Strange, the theatre is still in good repair, they added LED displays above the theateres (Cineplex Oden theatres of this era ussually had a number and the poster of what was playing). It hasn’t been updated much, it has two snack bars, the right one is closed. The cinema has 3 theatres to the right, and 4 to the left. I doubt its seats were updated, but last time I visited it (to see 40 Year Old Virgin opening weekend) the signage as well as the staff uniforms all read “Touchstar Cinemas”. Zola could have aquired it in that time, after searching through their website I discovered the company, like Touchstar, that aquires Florida cinemas left over from before the mega-plex boom (these theatres have a loyal following all their own). A few of Zota’s cinemas look like they were from Regal, one even looks to be from Cobb Cinemas (before Regal aquired the chain). They also have partnership with two other chains (although the website doesn’t give much information about the nature of the partnership). www.zotatheatres.com does not list the Sand Lake as theirs.
It opened in the early 90’s (maybe 91) under General Cinema, for a while it would be excusive bookings of major studio movies before they would open wide, it was considered a prestigious venue. It didn’t have stadium seating, AMC probably hasn’t made that improvement to it. I hear a roomer a year or two ago AMC was looking to close it down, but last I heard its alive and well.
Formerly General Cinema.
This is pathtic, the worst theatre in the area. Hartford deserves an Angelika or a Criterion Cinemas, Real Art Ways and Cinestudio are much better than this moldly theatre that probably hasn’t been upgrade since the 60’s, the place smells moldly.
I’m guessing prior to the muliplex boom that took place in Hartford County they got away with this horrable theatre because a.– they were the only theatre showing major art movies (verses Cinestudio which shows art, alternative and some cultrually significant Hollywood films and Real Art Ways which shows art, alternative films and documentaries) and b.– because its compition was the Showcase East Hartford, which is only in slightly better condition. Why upgrade the lobby? I’m there for the theatres, to see a movie, thats where I’ll spend more time.
I’m looking foward to the day it goes dark and Criterion Cinemas comes to West Hartford. I don’t have anything against old constructions but they have to be upgraded and at the very least they should have put in new seats.
I think Touchstar still owns this one. It was a Cineplex Oden, but closed before the merger. Touchstar runs it as a discounted first run theatre (tickets are 5.75 for adults and 3.50 for children and seniors). The touchstar organization also runs the Southcase 7, down the street, a former Regal and even before that part of the first fleet of the Cobb chain, as well as a former General Cinema in Altamante Springs.
Thats horrable considering the triplex was nice and didn’t really attract a huge, obnoxious crowd. The theatre still does well, it proves AMC won’t close a theatre because it’s “too small” for them, they have modified the grounds to make it less teen friendly but I never saw a real problem there, the movie goers (a cross section of diffrent races, ecnomic and social backrounds) never seemed to cause a problem, I always thought of it a nice place to go to the movies.
The Cinema De Lux concept is alive and well, but they have a diffrent feeling than The Bridge, which is like going to a trendy club or something. Both Bridge locations, one should note, came about when other chains devloping the sites went bankrupt- The LA Bridge was suposedly going to be an Edwards Cinema and the PA location was going to be Sundance Cinemas- both half constructed and adapted by designer Dyana Lee. I was hoping they’d adapt others this way, putting in stadium seating in their older houses, I imagine it could be done (in CT they updated two with stadium seating: Berlin and East Windsor). Cinema De Lux is a great concept, they’ve only opened one non-De Lux site in three years, but it only works in high income areas (I don’t know if this site is one). National Amusements seems to be shifting its focus on this high income areas (especially considering since in NJ they own the theatre with the highest ticket price, Edgewater).
National Amusements brings folks in by offering luxery services at their Cinema De Lux locations, these theatres are first rate all the way (City Center in White Plains by far a wonderful theater) – I think folks don’t like long lines and lots of previews (City Center starts the commericals seven minutes early, the feature starts about 7 minutes after the start time, thats not so bad).
Then again National Amusements unlike Regal, which built anywhere and everywhere opening plenty of loser sites, studies the sites for years before building one of their high quality theatres. Quality and atomphere are the way to go. N/A and Muvico are the future. Regal, simply dominates because it owns the most screens, but most of their theatres are ugly.
Opened as Magic Cinemas. Opened with 11 or 12 theatres and expanded later to 16.
In regards to that question posed by Jennifer Fieber the truth of the matter is IFC Films has created theatrical versions of some of its TV documentaries. A Decade Under the Influence was shown in theaters and shown on TV in a double the lenght extended cut. This is nothing new, look at the films of Bergman. IFC Center, however hasn’t gotten around to that yet.
Whats more offensive are those PG-13 rated softened versions of pictures that Miramax dumps in to theaters only to, months later, offer an Uncut R-rated (or hardened “unrated” version) for purchase. IFC isn’t doing that sort of thing.