TCL Chinese Theatre

6925 Hollywood Boulevard,
Los Angeles, CA 90028

Unfavorite 151 people favorited this theater

Showing 1,126 - 1,150 of 1,612 comments

BradE41
BradE41 on August 11, 2009 at 8:51 am

I have been feeling that Mann has been slowly closing shop and I guess I was right. The Chinese would be an easier lure than the Village and Bruin because of its historic value. I’m keeping my fingers crossed for Westwood, the Village is still my favorite theatre.

bruceanthony
bruceanthony on August 11, 2009 at 7:27 am

Im surprised that Paramount and Warner Bros allowed the circuit to decline so severely. If they had built up the circuit the way Pacific did it would have more value today. They have been lazy landlords. The Chinese has been booked so poorly in recent years. The Chinese should be treated like a flagship venue and positioned like the El Capitan and Cinerama Dome theatres. The Chinese is an industry venue and hosts many premieres. I hope Paramount and Warner Bros sells the Chinese to someone who will treat it with more dignity and class.brucec

MovieMatty
MovieMatty on August 11, 2009 at 4:11 am

Looks like the Chinese is on the block…again.

View link

The article notes that despite the economy, there is a likelier chance for a buyer to step in since Paramount and Warner Brothers are agreeing to sell theatres individually instead of the “package deal” of previous efforts.

KingBiscuits
KingBiscuits on July 30, 2009 at 11:04 pm

It looks like 9 will be booked into both the Chinese and Chinese 6 on September 9th since that will be the latest D-Box feature.

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on July 29, 2009 at 5:39 pm

I’m not sure if this has been posted before. The LAPL caption for this 1979 photo states that this was the biggest opening crowd in the history of the Chinese:
http://jpg3.lapl.org/pics18/00028719.jpg

JodarMovieFan
JodarMovieFan on July 26, 2009 at 8:30 pm

Unless I haven’t scrolled far enough up, has anyone experienced a movie here in the D-Box set up? I’m curious to know if it adds to the entertainment or is it just a gimmick? Also, are the screens at the Chinese 6 all the same size? The pictures Hollywood has seem to indicate Auditoriums 1 and 5 are the largest and have somewhat curved screens.

In the mid 90s, I went to Vegas and experienced Doug Trumbull’s Showscan 3D extravaganza at the Luxor Hotel. The screens were IMAX-huge and you wore these heavy 3D headsets that had speakers as you sat in motion controlled rocking seats. They were quite cool. I don’t remember the exact storyline but it seemed to be a journey through time. There were three parts and three different theaters. There was some prominence of an obelisk and lots of cool visual light shows and ending that reminded me of an expanded version of Back to the Future II’s depiction of a skyway. Anyway, D-Box sounds like a miniature version of what I experienced in Vegas. What made it work for me was of course, the humongous, yet clear screen size and sound inundation.

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on July 26, 2009 at 5:15 pm

It was a real zoo here last night. The new wax museum was open next to the theater, and a lot of people were congregating around Michael Jackson’s star. Plus the Harry Potter movie was playing. It does seem like the costumed characters are stating to overrun the tourists, there must have been thirty of them out there yesterday.

DonSolosan
DonSolosan on July 24, 2009 at 4:08 pm

Okay, so when you’re talking about the organ, you mean the pipes and equipment, not the console. Thanks.

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on July 24, 2009 at 2:43 pm

The downtown Metropolitan referred to above by Ken, is listed herein as the Paramount, /theaters/495/
and perhaps after the Carthay Circle, might be considered the worst demolition loss of historic Los Angeles cinemas.

Ken Roe
Ken Roe on July 24, 2009 at 2:17 pm

The console of the Wultitzer organ was in the center of the orchestra pit, so could be seen by the audience. The organ chambers were located in the ceiling, above the proscenium. To allow sound from the instrument into the auditorium, there was a tone chute, which allowed the sound to emit through the massive grillework above the main ceiling chandelier, giving an effect of the music seeming to ‘float’ over the audience.

A similar set up was also at two other Grauman theatres, the Metropolitan in Downtown, and the Egyptian along Hollywood Bouelvard.

DonSolosan
DonSolosan on July 24, 2009 at 1:48 pm

So, Roger, the audience couldn’t see the organist performing?

RogerA
RogerA on July 24, 2009 at 1:23 pm

To answer Jloew’s comment regarding the boxed space that is above what used to be the stage at the Chinese. That boxed space is standard fly space that most older theaters have. The organ was forward of that space. There is space between the ceiling and the roof of the Chinese and the organ was in that space located in rooms that were built to house the organ.

DonSolosan
DonSolosan on July 23, 2009 at 10:10 pm

The ticket stubs I have don’t say Aud 7 on them, they just say Graumans.

segask
segask on July 23, 2009 at 9:56 pm

I don’t think we need a seperate page. There’s an escalator and stairs that goes from the Footprint Forecourt up to the entrance of the multiplex. At the boxoffices (in the multiplex lobby and down on Hollywood Blvd) you can buy a ticket to a movie playing in Graumans or the multiplex. In fact, when you buy a ticket to Graumans the ticket says ‘Auditorium 7’ I think doesn’t it?

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on July 22, 2009 at 4:41 pm

I’m not opposed to a separate page, but I can see where someone new to the site is going to see Mann Chinese and start posting items about the older theater. There’s going to be a lot of mixed up comments.

CSWalczak
CSWalczak on July 22, 2009 at 4:38 pm

I don’t follow; why shouldn’t the Mann Chinese 6 have its own page? It is (and was constructed as) a separate theater (though in an adjacent building) with its own entrances and box office, and opened after the Grauman name was restored to the classic Chinese. It isn’t like the two cinemas that were once next to Grauman’s that operated as Grauman’s (Mann’s) Chinese 2 and 3 until they were torn down for the complex next door. The matter isobviously up to the moderators, but I think a separate entry is called for; the headnote could clarify any connection to to Graumann’s Chinese, but I really see very little.

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on July 22, 2009 at 4:19 pm

I disagree, Mark. I think if you split up the listings the comments are going to be intermixed anyway. I am having some problems with the theaters that have megapages, which may be my computer. I wonder if there’s a way to add a second page to a theater which may make it easier to load.

markinthedark
markinthedark on July 22, 2009 at 3:27 pm

correct. really there should be 2 separate listings: 1 for Grauman’s Chinese and the other for Chinese 6

CSWalczak
CSWalczak on July 22, 2009 at 3:23 pm

The pictures above appear to be not of Grauman’s Chinese, but of Mann’s Chinese 6 which opened as a part of the Hollywood-Highland complex which includes the Kodak Theater.

markinthedark
markinthedark on July 22, 2009 at 12:35 pm

Nice photos. You should send them to Cinematour

markinthedark
markinthedark on July 21, 2009 at 2:14 pm

At least the Chinese has booked something to see. Subpar bookings lately as most film go to the Arclight

DonSolosan
DonSolosan on July 21, 2009 at 2:08 pm

Isn’t it a crime to not have seen a show at the Chinese? It ought to be…

Chris Utley
Chris Utley on July 21, 2009 at 12:19 pm

Took my film club to see Harry Potter on 7/18 (Saturday night 7:00 PM show). House was 80% or so full. A couple of guys had never been here before – needless to say, the sound/screen/picture/decor blew them away.