RKO Keith's Theatre

135-35 Northern Boulevard,
Flushing, NY 11354

Unfavorite 44 people favorited this theater

Showing 1,126 - 1,150 of 1,352 comments found

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on June 6, 2006 at 7:39 am

Bway… I have a better photo of the old faded sign on the side of the building here in my photobucket album for the Keith’s. It’s the last photo in the top row.

The sign reads “RKO FLUSHING” in huge letters and beneath that in smaller print, “The finest theater on the North Shore”.

Jeffrey1955… I’ll see if I can get down there with my camera and snap some shots of the rear. As big as it is, the structure doesn’t run all the way back to the rear street, and there are some structures along that street that partially obscure the view. However, I have driven down the side street (Farrington) and have caught glimpses of the theater’s rear stage wall, which appears to be intact. Judging by what can be seen from the street, the roof also appears to be largely intact, but there may be sufficient gaps in the surface or at the seams to allow for water seepage. I don’t think there are any gaping holes in the outer walls or roofing that expose the auditorium to sunlight and weather. The partial demolition referred to above was done by the previous owner, Thomas Huang, who apparently had a field day (or two) with a demolition crew on some of the theater’s interior elements.

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on June 6, 2006 at 7:04 am

I attempted posting this yesterday, but apparently it didn’t take. Does anyone have any (recent) photos showing the rear of the building? I’m trying to figure out why all these photos make it look like the building is intact, yet earlier posts describe partial demolition and deterioration with the auditorium open to the elements. Where, exactly, is the destruction — is it entirely from a hole in the roof?

Bway
Bway on June 6, 2006 at 5:48 am

Lost, thanks for posting those photos. From the photo linked here below:
View link
..it appears that the word “Flushing” was at one time painted on the side of the building. Was the word “Flushing” ever in the official Theater title? Such as for example, “RKO Keiths Richmond Hill”?

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on June 5, 2006 at 10:07 am

I pass the theater with some frequency… As of yesterday, the theater is still standing.

lostmemory
lostmemory on June 5, 2006 at 7:49 am

This website has some 2004-05 photos of the RKO Keith’s Theater. Click each one to expand it.

lostmemory
lostmemory on June 5, 2006 at 7:38 am

This website has some 2004-05 photos of the RKO Keith’s Theater. Click each one to expand it.

Life's Too Short
Life's Too Short on June 4, 2006 at 5:47 pm

Please excuse me if the answer to my question is discussed above. I haven’t read this section for a while. Is the theatre still sitting there? Have they started to tear it down?

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on May 31, 2006 at 6:46 am

Then the fact that the New York article refers to RKO Plaza as an “entertainment and residential complex” should cast further doubt as to whether the journalist is writing with any sort of authoritative knowledge about the scope of the project and the extent of the theater’s restoration. As far as I can recall, the project has always been classified as largely residential with a small mix of ground level retail, restaurants and some sort of senior center. Or, is this what now constitutes “entertainment” in the eyes of real estate developers?

Warren G. Harris
Warren G. Harris on May 31, 2006 at 6:18 am

I doubt that Boymelgreen could suddenly change its plans without getting permission from the Flushing authorities. Turning it into an entertainment center would draw more people and cars into the area and turn downtown Flushing into even more of a traffic nightmare than it is now.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on May 31, 2006 at 5:00 am

You’re probably right, Warren. “Hall” as in “Foyer”. Still, I don’t think I’ve ever seen the complex referred to as including an “entertainment” center. Or has it? Anyway, that would seem to imply preserving more of the theater than just the lobby for such use, wouldn’t it?

Warren G. Harris
Warren G. Harris on May 31, 2006 at 3:25 am

I think that the writer of the article probably used “hall” as a synonym for “lobby,” not realizing that there can be a major difference between the two. While a lobby could be described as a hall, “hall” is usually reserved for auditoriums, ala Carnegie Hall or Radio City Music Hall.

judithblumenthal
judithblumenthal on May 30, 2006 at 5:40 pm

If you grew up in Brooklyn as I did, even if you didn’t know much about baseball, you were born a Dodgers worshipper and Ebbets Field was their cathedral.
Francesca

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on May 30, 2006 at 3:58 pm

I wonder if the print version of the article was less slipshod, Jeffrey, in its identification of the projects depicted. Still, your last point lands well. The author certainly stands in the minority with respect to her assessment of the Mets' new home, indicating her haste to work personal opinion into the piece rather than report objectively. I still think there is some manipulation of language being perpetrated by Boymelgreen and their pocket politicians when it comes to the project, designed to throw the casual preservationist off the scent. As far as I can decipher from all of this, only the landmarked portions of the Keith’s will be preserved. And those portions are limited to the grand foyer and mezzanine. Furthermore, a portion of that landmarked space will have to be destroyed in order to facilitate the undulating glass facade that is proposed to allow passers-by a peak inside from the sidewalk. It’s really quite a farce. If I’m wrong, then I’ll be very pleasantly surprised. I’ll be the first to sing Boymelgreen’s praises. But I don’t plan on clearing my throat any time soon.

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on May 30, 2006 at 3:24 pm

Note the following about the article link above:
1. The article is in New York magazine, not the New Yorker
2. The caption in the article’s initial group of illustrations is incorrect; that’s the new Mets stadium at bottom right, not top right
3. The author may or may not know what she’s talking about regarding the RKO Plaza; given her remark about “The Mets’ new and disappointingly retro-style stadium (why do we still mourn Ebbets Field?)” one doubts she would even give a rat’s rear end about whether or not the RKO Keith’s is actually being preserved.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on May 30, 2006 at 2:28 pm

This isn’t the first time we’ve been given the vague impression that the RKO Plaza project might include a full restoration of the theater. I think the politicians, beaurocrats and developers involved in the deal have purposely phrased any discussion of the project in such a way as to result precisely in this sort of confusion. We’ve been dissecting the semantics and political rhetoric in various articles, websites and Op-Ed letters for about a year – check back to a lot of the posts in October through January in particular and you’ll find the same questions as those posed by Warren just today.

NativeForestHiller
NativeForestHiller on May 30, 2006 at 1:01 pm

That is a very intresting point, Warren. It is something that will be looked into. Thank you for pointing it out! Here’s the article in the New Yorker magazine, for all those who are interested:

www.newyorkmetro.com/realestate/features/2016/17152/index.html

Warren G. Harris
Warren G. Harris on May 30, 2006 at 12:46 pm

According to an article in the latest issue of New York Magazine, the re-development project is a potential 2016 landmark sitting at the end of Main Street, “where the former RKO Keith’s Theater, now a darkened hulk, is to be transformed into the RKO Plaza— its exuberant hall preserved as the center of an entertainment and residential complex to top off the street.” Have I gone nuts, or is this an incorrect report of Boylmelgreen’s plans for the site? By “hall,” could the article actually mean “lobby?” Or is the auditorium being re-built and returned to entertainment use? In any case, the article claims that “no completion date” is available.

movieman69
movieman69 on May 30, 2006 at 10:30 am

Nevermind I got what you are saying!

movieman69
movieman69 on May 30, 2006 at 10:29 am

To Jeffrey1955:

“The Elephant Man” was rated PG

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on May 30, 2006 at 7:32 am

The one thing that jumps out at me? Every single picture, with the exception of The Elephant Man, is rated “R”.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on May 30, 2006 at 6:28 am

Came across an old copy of Newsday I saved from the time just after John Lennon’s murder. I also have copies of the NY Post and Daily News from this time and it seems that only in Newsday did theater chains like RKO run these sort of throwback block ads:

RKO block ad

Elsewhere in the paper, RKO also had a smaller block for its bargain-priced third run cinemas (at the time priced at “80 cents at all times”) such as the Mineola, Valley Stream and Hempstead Theaters.

AlexNYC
AlexNYC on May 6, 2006 at 7:48 pm

Cool, the Ink Spots. I keep forgetting that back in the days it wasn’t unusual to have a live musical act performing between the showings of films. It was before my time, but it was a good idea. The only live performances I’ve even seen before a film was the Rockettes at Radio City Music Hall.

carla22
carla22 on April 27, 2006 at 6:24 am

Thank you all for answering my question of what was of the building sitting there on Northern and Main St. I over heard one day a person on the bus mentioning, a movie theatre, I guess thats when it peak my interest in doing some research. I grew up in queens, but too young to have witnessed the movie theatre once there. All I get to see now is just rusty beams and boarded up doors and windows. A month ago, I had the chance to go to a music concert at the old loews Paradise Theatre in the Bronx, the interior was amazing, I loved it, so I can only imagine how beautiful the RKO Keith’s Theatre was.
About the old Alexanders/Caldor & Woolworth, I miss all that, ahhh memories. The only good things is that where Woolworth was once, is now a OldNavy, but honestly we don’t need anymore asian markets or trinkets stores there.

Thanks again.

NativeForestHiller
NativeForestHiller on April 22, 2006 at 6:56 pm

I appreciate it. Thank you very much for sharing them!!!