TCL Chinese Theatre

6925 Hollywood Boulevard,
Los Angeles, CA 90028

Unfavorite 135 people favorited this theater

Showing 1,151 - 1,175 of 1,496 comments

kencmcintyre on August 27, 2008 at 10:24 pm

Here is the LA Times obituary for Bill Hertz, who was involved in the hand and footprint ceremonies at Grauman’s for years:

kencmcintyre on August 20, 2008 at 2:30 am

I was wondering about the restaurant on the right side of the postcard of 8/16/08. Has that part of the building been converted regarding the extra screens that were added?

KJB2012 on August 19, 2008 at 7:25 pm

I like the idea of the “ghosts”. Too bad the house isn’t haunted. Maybe they could “adopt” a couple ghosts for Halloween.

kencmcintyre on August 16, 2008 at 9:08 pm

Here is an undated postcard from the NYPL:

kencmcintyre on August 16, 2008 at 3:04 am

No, it’s a re-creation of a crime involving some shooting back and forth.

kencmcintyre on August 16, 2008 at 2:54 am

Here is a new addition from the LA Library. Looks like an early episode of CSI:

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on July 30, 2008 at 7:46 pm

I liked seeing the Mr. Moto ad with Keye Luke’s name displayed, since he painted the beautiful murals in the Chinese Theater’s lobby.

segask on July 24, 2008 at 5:22 am

if Pacific had both the Dome and Grauman’s, would they open the big tentpole releases like Indy and Batman in both of them?

BradE41 on July 22, 2008 at 6:26 pm

I think the adjoing Chinese 6 are a liability to Grauman’s Chinese. Arclight may be stronger because the theatres are nicer and have more seating. Most big films are booked for the main theatre while the 6 plex is used for spillover or move-overs.

bruceanthony on July 22, 2008 at 5:47 pm

I think the logical choice would be for Pacific to take over the Chinese. There is not much left to the once powerful Mann theatre chain. The Chinese main theatre should have its choice of bookings like they did in the past. The Chinese use to host the best from Warner Bros and Paramount. Pacific has more clout than the current Mann theatre chain.brucec

kencmcintyre on July 18, 2008 at 6:05 pm

Superman was playing on Christmas day, according to the LA Times.

William on July 18, 2008 at 5:55 pm

Well “Superman: The Movie” opened on Dec. 14th. 1978 in the main house.

billwhite on July 18, 2008 at 5:41 pm

Does anybody remember what movie was playing here on christmas of 1978?

timquan on July 17, 2008 at 12:38 am

The Chinese theatre complex is underutilized, since it doesn’t have enough seating capacity to show a major blockbuster like ‘The Dark Knight’ on at least 3 screens.

suller on July 15, 2008 at 7:44 pm

Click on the link below to see a 7 min video from The Michael Caine hand- and Foot-print ceremony on July 11, 2008 at the Graumans Forecourt.

segask on July 1, 2008 at 6:23 am

this was already posted here last fall:

From “Los Angeles Business Journal” August 6, 2007:

Final bids were submitted for the purchase of the property beneath Grauman’s Chinese Theatre. The theater itself isn’t part of the package until 2023, after the theater’s 99-year ground lease expires. Then the historic landmark will pass to the owner of the land. In the meantime, the winner of the bid will be able to collect rent from the Mann Theatres chain, which now owns the theater … . .

From “los Angeles Times,” September 3, 2007

Grauman’s Chinese Theatre, a Hollywood landmark that attracts millions of tourists each year to its outdoor courtyard where generations of movie stars left their hand and footprints, has been purchased by Hollywood’s largest commercial landlord … . .

… . . Mann Theatres has a long-term lease on the legendary venue for movie premieres and will continue to operate it as a film house. It was sold to CIM by the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Center of New York and Barlow Respiratory Hospital of Los Angeles … .

so CIM owns the land and Mann still owns the building? (until 2023?)

BradE41 on July 1, 2008 at 12:59 am

INDIANA JONES moves over to Chinese 6 on Wednesday from Arclight.

BradE41 on July 1, 2008 at 12:49 am

It would be worse if Mann still had the twins next door to the main theatre, and was competing with Arclight. The problem with booking at Chinese 6 is that there are only 2 larger screens, I think because the Arclight has overall larger (and more) auditoriums it gets more bookings. The Chinese 6 really is designed for move-overs and is used alot for small film festivals, special screeings and rentals.

KramSacul on July 1, 2008 at 12:10 am

It used to be that Grauman’s would get the big Fox, Warner, and Paramount films while the Dome/Arclight would get Universal, Sony, Miramax, New Line, etc. Now it’s all screwed up. Is it Mann or the studios that are leaving Grauman’s with nothing big to show?

Chris Utley
Chris Utley on July 1, 2008 at 12:05 am

At the end of the day, Mann’s decision to build a 6 screen theatre to accompany the crown jewel of movie theatres worldwide was not a smart one. I still think that the complex’s lack of screenage makes it a less-attractive option for booking a nice array of titles.

BradE41 on June 30, 2008 at 11:59 pm

On paper, SPEED RACER was a can’t miss and unfortunately flopped. GET SMART is considered a success and THE STRANGERS was a surprise hit. NARNIA like WALL-E are El Capitan and is a given. Granted Arclight has secured more films, everything you mentioned is virtually everything that Hollywood was offering. There is not alot being released currently. With Chinese’s 7, and Arclight’s 15 there is definately an over saturation of screens, and both screens almost always play films of more than one screen. August through December there are much more films being released.

Chris Utley
Chris Utley on June 30, 2008 at 11:36 pm

I beg to differ, Brad. Arclight/The Dome’s 15 screens is a definite advantage. If you open a blockbuster at Grauman’s and on 2-3 other screens at Chinese 6, that means that the whole theatre is practically booked. On the other hand, that same blockbuster can open at The Dome and 2-3 other screens at Arclight and you’ve still got 12 screens available for product.

Let’s look at the last 4 films to play at Grauman’s Chinese: “Harold & Kumar: Escape From Guantanamo Bay”, “Speed Racer”, “The Strangers” and “Get Smart”. Also opening during that same time period – but not at Grauman’s: “Iron Man”, “What Happens In Vegas”, “Narnia-Prince Caspian”, “Indy 4”, “Sex and the City”, “Kung Fu Panda”, “The Incredible Hulk”, “You Don’t Mess With The Zohan”, “The Love Guru”, “Wanted” and “Wall-E”…with “Hancock” coming up this week.

Every film on that list would need to run on 2-3 screens minimum on opening weekend. As I said, you execute that plan at Grauman’s/Chinese 6 and there’s no other room to fit anything else on the schedule. That’s not the studios' fault or even Arclight’s fault for that matter. That blame goes on Mann’s ownership who was obviously stuck in a 1980’s mindset when they foolishly thought that 6 screens was enough to support Grauman’s.

BradE41 on June 30, 2008 at 4:26 pm

Grauman’s Chinese will not be tossed aside; it still has tremendous historical significance to Hollywood and Southern California.

The problem remains is unavailability of Studio Product. Over the past decade or so between May â€" July there is less Hollywood Product available. If you look at the release schedules during that time period each weekend seems to have ‘one’ major blockbuster and one or two counter programming titles; in short there is not a lot of films being released even though it seems so. Come August through the end of the year the releases increase. The only thing that could be done is to break the zoning rules and book at both Chinese and Arclight; recently Mann and Pacific have done that with Glendale, not sure how long this will last but it seems to be what was decided on. They could impose a rule that a film cannot play at the Dome or main Chinese simultaneously, other than that option it will remain like this.

Chris Utley
Chris Utley on June 27, 2008 at 7:59 pm

“What exactly is Mann doing?”

From my vantage point, looks like Mann is preparing to exit from the game altogether. They just ain’t got the mojo anymore. Hate to say it, but the facts are obvious. Wasn’t the smartest move in the world building only 6 screens to operate alongside Grauman’s vs. the 14 that Pacific/Arclight built alongside Arclight Hollywood. And, later on, taking on the Bevely Center 13 to run 2nd runs at 1st run prices?

Mann is officially a shell of their former selves. Cross your fingers and hope that AMC picks them up – cause if Regal does, Grauman’s is gonna get carved up like a cheap Tombstone pizza!

Chris Utley
Chris Utley on June 27, 2008 at 7:49 pm

Mark, the house was roughly 50%-60% full on a Saturday night.

We took about 11 members of my 600 member film club to see it. My assistant event organizer – not knowing that Grauman’s seats 1400 – erroneously told the folks to get their tickets online when they actually could have walked up to the ticket booth, bought them on the spot and saved themselves a buck.