Not a member yet? Register now.

Love message boards?

Cinema Treasures is looking for a volunteer to help us with our growing community. more
 

Search

Theaters News Links

Advanced search
 
 

Cinema Treasures Poll

What is your favorite use of existing classical music in a movie?

 "Blue Danube" in 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
 "Symphony No. 9" in A Clockwork Orange (1971)
 "Rhapsody in Blue" in Manhattan (1979)
 "Barber of Seville" in Breaking Away (1979)
 "Ride of the Valkyries" in Apocalypse Now (1979)
 "Adagio for Strings" in Platoon (1986)
 "Bolero" in Femme Fatale (2002)
 Other

Login to view results and vote
 

News Archive

 

Add Theater News

Got a scoop about your favorite Cinema Treasure?
Tell us about it!
 
  Discover. Preserve. Protect.

Up to 15,000 additional screens slated to get digital 3-D

posted by CWalczak on September 24, 2009 at 7:40am

At a “3-D Entertainment Summit” held in Los Angeles on September 16, major exhibitors were heartened to hear that financing was being made available to equip thousands of additional screens for digital 3-D films over the next five years. Currently, there are about 2,700 screens equipped for digital 3-D exhibition, a number which exhibitors believe seriously limits their profits from the increasing number of 3-D films studios are releasing. Still, some theater owners were skeptical that that the number of 3-D venues would increase as rapidly as projected.

To date there are only 2,700 3-D screens in North America, limiting the potential returns that studios can reap from the higher ticket prices from 3-D releases (moviegoers typically must pay an extra $3 to see 3-D films). With the new financing, that number is expected to grow by 4,000 by the of the year, or nearly 10% of all screens in North America.

Here’s the rest of the story from the L.A. Times.

Email article Printer-friendly version

YOUR COMMENTS

 
Same old boring crap. Digital, digital, digital, ra, ra, ra, big deal.
posted by movie534 on Sep 24, 2009 at 8:27am
I'm on your side of this issue. But, in the case of 3-D, digital makes sense. There's no chance of operator screw up when they don't have to worry about lens adjustments, convergence, etc.
posted by Bob Furmanek on Sep 24, 2009 at 4:18pm
But what happens if the computer goes haywire?
posted by Justin Fencsak on Sep 24, 2009 at 5:20pm
You call tech support in India and stay on hold for three hours while the customers riot and wreck the movie theater. LOL

posted by Lost Memory on Sep 24, 2009 at 7:51pm
Now they just have to worry about making GOOD* movies in 3-D. Surely there's other uses for it besides animation, horror and concert films.

*Up and Coraline are excluded from this rant - but Final Destination...come on, it would have been crap in 2-D, I think the New York Times said it's plot was about as complex as a text message - I couldn't agree more. Same for the unwatchable, boring piece of garbage that was touted as 3-Ds next revolution, Monsters Vs. Aliens. This is why Pixar is successful, they create rich, well told stories with amazing detail that connect on every emotional level - if all films were as good as Pixar's, people would be going to the movies twice a week. With that said the 3-D really didn't do much to improve on Up. As for Coraline, it was the most innovative use of 3-D, playing with dimensions and telling a very strange (but extremely entertaining) story.
posted by John J. Fink on Sep 25, 2009 at 5:52am
when my neighborhood theatre - AMC Mazza Galleria get's a 3D system I'll be REAL happy - AMC get your butt in gear, Regal is fulfilling it's promise... AMC's committment and implementation is seriousily lagging.
posted by Giles on Oct 21, 2009 at 5:25pm
well... a Sony 4K systme DID debut this week at Mazza for 'Saw VI' - it is rumoured that Auditorium 4 will get a 3D system up and running come mid-November
posted by Giles on Oct 23, 2009 at 1:43pm
Comment
*


Note: Please read our comment policy before posting. Comments which are off-topic, obscene, spam, or personal attacks will be removed. Help us keep the discussion productive!