Search

Theaters News Links

Advanced search
 

Theater Guide

Now listing 26,635 theaters & 1,598 photos… more
Browse by...
 

Add Your Cinema Treasure!

Add Theater
Add Photo (offline)
Add Theater News
 

Newest Theaters

Nov 22 Fox Theatre
Nov 22 Queens Hall
Nov 21 Ada Theatre
Nov 21 Yale Theatre
Nov 21 Oklahoma Theatre
Nov 21 Lyric Theatre
Nov 21 Grand Theatre
Nov 21 The Sheung Wan…
Nov 21 Cinemas West 4
Nov 21 Pathe Vaise
more new theaters
 

Recent Comments

Nov 22 Trans-Lux Modern… (23)
Nov 22 Egyptian Theater (4)
Nov 22 Christown Cinemas (11)
Nov 22 Seventh Street… (4)
Nov 22 Hollywood Malibu… (9)
Nov 22 Colony Theatre (32)
Nov 22 Square Theatre (20)
Nov 22 Loew's Jersey… (1232)
Nov 22 Broadway Theatre (25)
Nov 22 Normandy Theatre (16)
 
 
 
  Discover. Preserve. Protect.

Grand Theater

Brooklyn, NY
743 Grand Street, Williamsburg
, Brooklyn, NY 11211 United States
(map)
Status: Closed/Demolished
Screens: Single Screen
Style: Unknown
Function: Unknown
Seats: 545
Chain: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Firm: Unknown
Add a photo for this theater!
A small theater that seated about 500 . It showed B-movies and serials in the 1940s. It closed in the 1960s and has been replaced by a McDonald's. It was located on Grand Street between Humboldt and Graham Avenue.
Contributed by BOB DITTMEIER


YOUR COMMENTS

 
The Grand Theatre was located at 743 Grand Street and had 545 seats, according to the 1949 Film Daily Year Book.
posted by Warren G. Harris on Mar 19, 2004 at 7:13am
I also remember that prior to Macdonalds taking over it was an insurance office, I believe that it was John Hancock, and later a doctors office.
posted by .. on Jun 27, 2004 at 1:08pm
Anyone have any old photos of the Grand? It closed when I was very young. I rememeber it as a John Hancock Insurance office (or was it Metropolitan Life?), then a medical center, and now a McDonald's. It was totally gutted, so there is no evidence of it ever being a theater.
posted by Bob D. on Nov 27, 2007 at 8:27pm
Before The Grand Theatre was a movie theater, it was a vaudeville playhouse. I have a January 14, 1907 program, when The Grand featured the play "Grogan's Alley," followed by musical performances by (among others) Violet Villiers (Singing Soubrette) and Sabine and Dale, Assisted by Miss Cora Spencer, "in their laughable comedy creation, entitled 'Training a Husband,'" followed by "the electric marvel of the age," (presumably a motion picture) presenting 10 rounds of a fight between Jack O'Brien and Tommy Burns, refereed by "the world's champion James J. Jeffries." The program notes that amateur contests were held every Thursday night -- and that every Friday night was "Athletic Night."
posted by C. R. Brewster on Jan 13, 2008 at 7:27pm
It was what was known as a "dump" in the 1950s. Showing third run features. Saturday matinee included a triple feature, 15 cartoons, and several serials. Many was the hour I spent there. Noon to five on Saturday.

Nearby were the Graham which showed even older and less desireable features and the Rainbow - a first run theater.

posted by tobaccocard on Jun 17, 2008 at 1:39pm
Is this a photo of the Grand Theater? This was taken during the 1888 Blizzard. If not, what theater is this?

Click Here for Photo

posted by Bway on Jan 13, 2009 at 7:36am
This is a photo of the Grand Theater site in a photo I took back in 2005, but forgot to ever post here:


Click Here for Photo
posted by Bway on Jan 13, 2009 at 7:38am
I see an image of the renovated Bushwick Theatre, and nothing indicating the 1888 blizzard.
posted by Warren G. Harris on Jan 13, 2009 at 7:39am
Crap, I am sorry, I gave the wrong link for my first comment about the 1888 Blizzard, this is the link I meant to post....obviously the other photo is of the RKO Bushwick in current days, haha:

Anyway, is THIS a photo of the Grand Theater, in a photo taken in the 1888 Blizzard. If not, what is this theater?

Click Here for photo






posted by Bway on Jan 13, 2009 at 7:41am
I doubt if the photo shows this Grand Theatre. It is probably the Grand Opera House, one of the leading theatres in Brooklyn in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
posted by Warren G. Harris on Jan 13, 2009 at 8:02am
P.S. You should be able to find more information about the Grand Opera House in the early Brooklyn Eagle issues that are accessible through the website of the Brooklyn Public Libary.
posted by Warren G. Harris on Jan 13, 2009 at 8:06am
I believe that the theatre in the 1888 blizzard photo, as well as the one mentioned by C.R. Brewster in a post above of 1/13/08 at 7:27pm, was not this Grand, but the Grand Opera House in downtown Brooklyn. The Grand Opera House was built in 1881 and situated on Elm Place between Fulton and Livingston Streets. The ground site had previously been occupied by a Congregational Church. According to newspaper reports at the time, the Grand Opera House was built of brick, with a brown-stone front. The stage was 70 feet wide and 36 in depth. The crown of the proscenium arch was 40 feet above the stage. The auditorium had two balconies and was "tastefully decorated, well ventilated and heated." Seating capacity was about 3,000, and the cost of construction was estimated at $75,000. The theatre's owners were William Barry and Hugh Fay, well-known variety actors, and Benjamin Lewis, a politician and insurance agent.
posted by Warren G. Harris on Jan 14, 2009 at 7:14am
Thank you Warren, you are correct.
posted by Bway on May 28, 2009 at 11:34am
I have several pictures of the front of the theatre taken in the 1930s, 1940s and the 1950s. The blizzard photo is definitely not the subject theatre.
posted by GTB on Sep 8, 2009 at 10:08am
There is discussion above about the Grand Opera House in Brooklyn, which is not to be confused with this theater, the Grand. The Grand Opera House is listed under Brooklyn in the 1897-98 edition of the Julius Cahn Official Theatrical Guide. Unfortunately, there are no street addresses in this Guide. The house was managed by Hyde & Behman, the stage dimensions are similar to what Warren has posted above. The admission prices ranged from 25 cents to $1.50; there were 600 orchestra seats, 500 in the balcony, 800 in the gallery, and 100 box seats. Total, 2,000 seats, plus 200 standing spaces. There were 10 musicians in the house orchestra.
posted by Ron Salters on Sep 8, 2009 at 10:32am
In reading the thread, two things stick out: (1) the Grand probably did not make it into the 1960's, as noted in the intro. When I was growing up in the 1950's, the Grand was always spoken about in the past tense. Thus, I doubt very much that it lasted beyond the mid-1950's. I think of it as a clone of the Nassau - the one in Greenpoint - that also gave up the ghost at around that time.

(2) I was also surprised to learn that the Grand, despite its clearly inferior location, was considered to be a superior venue to the Graham Theater, which was located on the main drag. While both were clearly secondary houses, I would have thought that the Graham would have been the preferred choice of those who would not have wanted to travel to the "good" theaters.

posted by John Dereszewski on Sep 8, 2009 at 5:24pm
The "superior venue" of the Grand may have been due to the fact that the admission was lower than the Graham as The Grand ran inexpensive to rent "B" movies. This brought in swarms of kids all weekend long. The money was made from the captive audience spending all they had at the concessions. The Graham tried to run more new releases. Higher movie rental fees meant higher ticket prices and therefore fewer customers spending money at the concessions. The "B" houses are run profitably if they are run like a circus or carnival. The acts bring the customers to the side show where you get their money. With the advent of television, this business model no longer works. The TV is a cheaper "baby sitter".
posted by GTB on Sep 9, 2009 at 9:19am
Yes, I guess the "movie theater as baby sitter" function is the reason why so many of the movie houses hired matrons to supervise the kids during those endless Saturday matinees. (In case you are interested, both the Ridgewood and Madison theatre pages feature great stories about their legendary matrons.)
posted by John Dereszewski on Sep 10, 2009 at 5:52am
yes right i agree with all of you..

bedwetting in older children
posted by Draven Hall on Sep 19, 2009 at 8:20am
I have not been back to this site for a long time, but the Grand Theater I identified in my 1/13/08 posting as a former vaudeville house was, in fact, the Grand Theater on Grand Street. The 1907 program that I have includes a seating map that shows "exits no. 1,2,3 leading to Grand Street" and "exits no. 4 and 5 leading to South 1st Street." The theater was managed by Davis & Marks. This was not the Grand Opera House on Elm.

C. R. Brewster
posted by C. R. Brewster on Nov 3, 2009 at 7:24pm
The Grand Theater in Brooklyn, NY was not near any "South 1st St." It is possible that the street names were changed since the 1907 program, but I doubt it.
posted by GTB on Nov 4, 2009 at 7:21am
I agree with GTB that the old Grand could not be the Opera House. It is situated no where near South 1st.

In reviewing the CT files for this community, I came up with a possible alternative. It is the Metro Theatre, which was situated at 194 Grand St. This lot backs right into South 1st. In addition, the site description notes that the Metro replaced an old vaudeville house named the Unique Theatre in the mid 1920's and that a theater had existed here since 1894. Now it is possible that the Unique was also known as the Opera House during a portion of its existence, including 1907. Food for thought.
posted by John Dereszewski on Nov 5, 2009 at 11:35am
The Grand survived well into the 60's. As noted in a comment on the Republic Theater's site, the Grand became a Premiere Showcase outlet when that venture was rolled out. It suddenly was catapulted to "first-run" status.
posted by Hector Priamson on Nov 5, 2009 at 1:44pm
Comment
*

Notify me when someone replies to my comment?
Note: Please read our comment policy before posting. Comments which are off-topic, obscene, spam, or personal attacks will be removed. Help us keep the discussion productive!