Majestic Theatre

240 Collinsville Avenue,
East St. Louis, IL 62201

Unfavorite 9 people favorited this theater

Showing 1 - 25 of 68 comments found

Joe Vogel
Joe Vogel on May 30, 2012 at 2:33 pm

An ad for the American Seating Company in the October 6, 1928, issue of Motion Picture News featured a photo of the auditorium of Redmon’s Majestic Theatre.

ghamilton
ghamilton on October 14, 2010 at 6:13 pm

THIS theater’s demise is a crime.

jwballer
jwballer on October 14, 2010 at 3:04 pm

The stage has also collapsed and in the first auditorium photo, looking towards the former stage, there a garage door that looks like it has been caved in.

jwballer
jwballer on October 14, 2010 at 3:01 pm

Also in the 2008 photos theres A LOT of graffiti, water damage, exposed wires, stolen things, and partially collapsed beams.
There is also light coming through the projection booth.

jwballer
jwballer on October 14, 2010 at 2:58 pm

But good point. A skylight that small wouldn’t bring in that much light.
The photos from supercharger96 show that the roof is ready to collapse.
Maybe it has collapsed but google or bings aerial views haven’t been updated scince then.
By the way, if you look to the left < side on the majestic’s roof, and a tiny spot on the right it looks like some of the roof has caved in or is ready to. There is also a small spot in the front of the theatre’s roof where it looks like something has been filed in.
View link
Press satilite and zoom all the way in and say what you think.8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wl

jwballer
jwballer on October 14, 2010 at 2:50 pm

Bing and google maps have the same aerial views.

RobertEndres
RobertEndres on October 14, 2010 at 1:12 pm

Re: William’s note about the skylight on the 13th. They did put skylights over the stage in some houses. Radio City had three. They could be swung open if there was a fire on stage to ventilate the area and not fill the auditorium with smoke. When we did the “Lion King” premiere we had a Disney stage show which featured lots of pyrotechnic usage. The first rehearsal where the fireworks were used generated so much smoke that all of the elevators responded to a fire warning, went to the basement and stopped running until the smoke was cleared. Stagehands went up to the roof and opened the skylights. After that, for the rest of the run they were opened for the stage show. Since we were doing matinee performances, we could see a small patch of sunlight from the open skylights hitting the stage floor during the screening of the film. Every day it moved closer to the screen and we were wondering when it would actually get into the picture area. Fortunately, the run ended before that happened, but we were aware of the skylights after that.

I also remember working a Diana Ross concert one really stormy night when the stagehands had to go up and throw tarps over the skylights because the rain was coming down on stage about where Ms. Ross was to make her entrance.

The skylights did contain glass panels as normal skylights would, but the glass was painted black. Thinking about it now, I wonder if that wasn’t done so that a major fire involving the drops hung in the flies would generate enough heat to break the glass, creating a self opening skylight to ventilate the heat and smoke upward.

I would suspect what you saw at the Majestic was indeed a skylight over the stage house.

Chuck1231
Chuck1231 on October 14, 2010 at 11:01 am

Went by yesterday, the “This Building is Condemned” signs are still posted on the boarded up front doors.

Joe Vogel
Joe Vogel on October 13, 2010 at 10:20 pm

The stage house roof is intact on the bird’s-eye view of the theater at Bing Maps, too. In the bird’s-eye, the structure on the roof that resembles a skylight looks more like it might have been part of the building’s ventilation system. It looks like it is partly covered with sheet metal, but some of the metal is missing, exposing an underlying framework.

In the 2008 photo, note the shadows falling from the two beams that cross the missing stage floor. The one on the left extends almost straight down, while the one on the right is at more of an angle. These shadows are consistent with light falling from the left section of the stage house roof, where that skylight-like structure is.

From the bird’s-eye view it doesn’t look like there’s any glass in the structure where the light gets in. If that’s the case, then it doesn’t bode well for the building. If it’s entirely open, then water can get in. Maybe the hole has been plugged since the various photos were taken, but if it hasn’t, water will soon destroy the building’s integrity. The Majestic could soon be unsalvageable— if it isn’t already.

William
William on October 13, 2010 at 6:07 pm

If you go to ICB’s post from Apr. 30 2009, it has pictures of the interior which shows the light coming from that square on the stage house. I don’t think they would put a skylight above a stage. Was there a water tower on the stage house? It could be the old platform for it.

jwballer
jwballer on October 13, 2010 at 5:32 pm

I just saw that. Thats odd.

spectrum
spectrum on October 12, 2010 at 7:40 pm

Very strange. I checked the Google Maps aerial photo of the Majestic. The roof looks intact over the entire building. There is what looks like a large skylight over the stage, and what might be a small hole above the projection booth area.

DonLewis
DonLewis on September 22, 2010 at 11:12 pm

From the early 1900s a postcard view of Redmon'sMajestic Theatre in East St. Louis.

Chuck1231
Chuck1231 on April 27, 2010 at 12:46 am

2008 photo of the auditorium of the Majestic. Looks like there is no roof over the stage house with all the sunlight showing on the stage.
View link

Chuck1231
Chuck1231 on April 14, 2010 at 6:14 pm

With the Economy of East St. Louis and the condition of the Majestic I don’t think this theatre will ever see a renovation.

jwballer
jwballer on April 12, 2010 at 8:46 pm

This place needs to get restored.

DavidZornig
DavidZornig on February 27, 2010 at 6:52 am

To Chuck1231, the link with the current pics (10/11/08) you mentioned is still up, and was/is posted above by supercharger96 on 10/21/08.

The dog skeleton has a pretty large skull. I wonder if it was originally a guard dog that was sadly just forgotten about.

JMSanders
JMSanders on September 10, 2009 at 4:17 pm

My parents and grandparents spent a lot of time in this theater. My Aunt actually worked there in the ticket booth, sometimes letting her husband to be in free. I’d love to share any vintage photos available with them if there are any around.
JMS

iancoulterbuford
iancoulterbuford on April 30, 2009 at 2:49 am

I just emailed the mayor about this situation! I agree with all of you! This needs to happen for the sake of us, the youth!

I do have pictures of the Majestic now from 2008. It’s not in too bad of shape considering it has been sitting there for over forty years.

View link

bbrown1
bbrown1 on April 15, 2009 at 8:37 pm

For a brief history and some other interesting information about the Majestic (and some other early East St Louis theatres), go to the link below, and click “View the Record” at the bottom of the page:

View link

Chuck1231
Chuck1231 on March 30, 2009 at 5:55 pm

There is a web site that shows recent interior photos, I am sorry that I didn’t keep the link. but the theatre is in horible shape inside. part of the back roof has fallen in, water leaks throughout the theatre, there was even a photo of skeletons of a mother dog and its baby. Knowing East St. Louis' economy I don’t this theatre will ever be revived.

Life's Too Short
Life's Too Short on March 26, 2009 at 3:37 pm

Doesn’t look like it is in the worst shape in the world inside or out. Problem is, what would you do with it if it were fixed up?

Roloff
Roloff on February 16, 2009 at 1:39 pm

A hi-res scan of the postcard at the top of the page can be seen in my flickr stream:
View link
Gorgeous place, the exterior doesn’t seem to be in such a bad shape judging from the photos posted above. Notice all the detail in the tiny tiles on the facade!