Chicago Theatre

175 N. State Street,
Chicago, IL 60601

Unfavorite 86 people favorited this theater

Uploaded By

Tiny Tinseltoes

More Photos of This Theater

Photo Info

Taken on: October 20, 2006

Uploaded on: December 7, 2012

Exposure: 1/15 sec, f/2.8

Camera: Canon Canon PowerShot A200

Software: Picasa

Size: 286.2 KB

Views: 391

Full EXIF: View all

Exposure_bias_value: 0

Software: Picasa

Image_unique_id: 44860f8d911c1bff83e2c1d395769ca3

Max_aperture_value: 97349/32768

Date_time: Fri Dec 07 13:36:03 -0800 2012

Compressed_bits_per_pixel: 3

Model: Canon PowerShot A200

Color_space: 1

Sensing_method: 2

Make: Canon

Artist: Picasa


Exposure_time: 1/15

Shutter_speed_value: 125/32

Focal_plane_x_resolution: 76800/13

X_resolution: 180

Flash: 16

Metering_mode: 5

Pixel_x_dimension: 744

Aperture_value: 97349/32768

F_number: 14/5

Focal_plane_y_resolution: 1024000/173

Resolution_unit: 2

Y_resolution: 180

Date_time_original: Fri Oct 20 12:59:06 -0700 2006

Pixel_y_dimension: 941

Ycb_cr_positioning: 1

Focal_plane_resolution_unit: 2

Focal_length: 5

Date_time_digitized: Fri Oct 20 12:59:06 -0700 2006

License: By

"Kiss Me Kate" in 3-D plus stage show (1953)

Unfavorite No one has favorited this photo yet

Comments (2)

Tinseltoes on December 7, 2012 at 10:46 am

The Chicago was probably the only theatre in the USA (if not the world) to present “Kiss Me Kate” in 3-D with support from a stage show. Radio City Music Hall in NYC ran the musical’s “flat” version.

Jon Lidolt
Jon Lidolt on February 13, 2013 at 9:16 am

Contrary to popular belief, Kiss Me Kate did get a fairly wide 3-D release. MGM found that in test engagements the 3-D version did more business. As to Radio City, their ultra wide auditorium made it impractical for people seated at the sides to watch in 3-D. This is due to the fact that silver screens, which are required for 3-D viewing, reflect light straight ahead leaving audiences sitting to the sides watching a very dark and unevenly lit image.

You must login before making a comment.

New Comment