Ziegfeld Theatre

141 W. 54th Street,
New York, NY 10019

Unfavorite 131 people favorited this theater

Showing 3,126 - 3,150 of 4,511 comments

Movieguy718
Movieguy718 on September 9, 2006 at 9:09 am

ED: The picture isn’t bad at all – a couple reels are a little scratched. The soundtrack is unforgivable though…

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on September 9, 2006 at 7:45 am

How bad is “bad print”, Movieguy718? I’m taking my lady to see the film for the first time and I would have really liked a nice quality print with decent contrast. As important as seeing “Casablanca” on a big screen, I have little tolerance for faded B&W prints, particularly when I can purchase a DVD that looks impeccable on a big screen monitor. Curious as to the quality of “Kane”, Bill… I’ll check in later.

At least the framing is proper!

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on September 9, 2006 at 7:37 am

I wonder if it was the same woman who ruined “Doctor Zhivago” in February by complaining about the volume? I hope they respond so quickly to me if I complain that today’s “Citizen Kane” show is not loud enough!

Movieguy718
Movieguy718 on September 9, 2006 at 7:18 am

CASABLANCA on Friday night. Nice turnout. Whoever ran the show took extra care to frame the picture properly so I had high hopes…
Movie starts, nice and loud. Within minutes it is inaudible. I run out. Someone had complained that it was too loud. It MIGHT have been turned back up a notch but what ensued was 95 minutes of sound that ranged from completely inaudible dialogue to just understandable to loud music. No doubt it’s a bad print, but considering that whoever runs the show only has ONE show to run, they could have sat on the volume dial and adjusted it a little more. They do a better job of that at the Chelsea Classics every Thursday.
The picture however was quite good.

Mike (saps)
Mike (saps) on September 9, 2006 at 3:45 am

I will be checking out “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly,” which I’ve never seen. Also looking forward to “Cabaret,” which originally opened at the Ziegfeld, and the “Grease” sing-a-long should be a lot of fun.

rhett
rhett on September 9, 2006 at 2:39 am

I am also disapointed by the lineup of films (Great films ALL but done to death) I’m willing to bet that these films weren’t the ones that had all the votes on the forms we filled out at the last festival.

Want to see a good schedule…check out the Lafayette’s Fall lineup

“Becket”, “Man Who Would Be King”…and yes, even “Kane” next week, which I’ll be at.

One of my suggestions for Ziegfeld was to do revivals of films that were popular there…“Marooned” the first film to play the Ziegfeld….and I do consider the fact that prints of these films and many others are either poor or unavailable…I just think the lineup could have been a little more “surprising” considering all the posts read here about other festivals and 70MM screenings going on, such as, “Around world/80 days”, “Patton” “Towering Inferno” and such. I’m not complaining, (I still think its great that the Ziegfeld is having such a festival considering all the garbage out there now) I’m just being an “ungrateful nudge” Apologies all around.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on September 8, 2006 at 2:16 pm

Hey, listen… it certainly isn’t the most thrilling of schedules, but after all, it is a viewer’s choice affair, having been culled from all those request cards we were asked to fill out during the last festival. And I’m no spring chicken, but any chance I get to see a classic like “Citizen Kane” or “Casablanca” on a big screen in a facility such as the Ziegfeld (rather than the closet sized screening rooms at most revival houses in NYC) is an opportunity to good to pass up. And when’s the last time “Jaws” was seen on a silver screen in NY? This festival, like it or not, represents the “popular vote” and will just have to do since the Ziegfeld is not a revival house. And until such time as the Ziegfeld decides to seriously make the commitment towards a bona fide revival program (hiring a full time programmer, ensuring that a union pro is in the booth at all times and abandoning platter for reel-to-reel changeover), that’s all we can reasonably expect from these festivals.

Meanwhile, my biggest fears are that the prints are in poor shape or that improper plates and screen masks are used for the old Academy ratio films.

I look forward to hearing comments from those members who attend the festival this weekend as to the quality of prints and presentation. I plan on checking out “Kane” and “Casablanca” on Thursday afternoon, barring any scathing notices on this forum.

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on September 8, 2006 at 12:16 pm

Just had a chance to go through the Ziegfeld revival schedule.

Wow what a dud.

The only interesting films have been shown a gazillion times in revival houses and on TCM.
Of course if you were born after 9/11 there might be something interesting to see.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on September 1, 2006 at 4:55 am

RobertR… What is the Olympia Theater advertised at the bottom of the clipping playing what looks like revival/art with “Strangers on a Train” and “Contempt”? Could it be the venerable theater at B'way and 107th that was torn down a couple of years back?

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on August 31, 2006 at 4:31 pm

“Ryan’s Daughter” Daily News ad, November 1970. I hope it finds its way back there again someday.

View link

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on August 31, 2006 at 3:24 am

Thanks for the great ad, RobertR. I’d forgotten how much I missed those great old New York critics. Starting October 6th, we can all re-create that day in 1972 by going to the Ziegfeld.

William
William on August 22, 2006 at 12:14 pm

Focus drift is one of the problems you will get when you show older used prints. Sometimes you have to sit and ride the focus during the show. What also makes a platter show boring in the booth is that the show is run using automation. So when you inspect and build-up the print the projectionists places cue tape pieces on the print. So at show time he just pushes start and the automation does the rest.

xfrql
xfrql on August 19, 2006 at 6:57 pm

Did anyone else have issues with how the films were FOCUSED during the last festival of classics? Some of them were really in sharp focus but both the Indiana Jones films I saw were a little off, to the point of being a distraction for me. My worst experience during the festival was one of the last evening showings of Dr. Zhivago, which was REALLY off focus. No, I don’t mean the pictures were indistinguishable blobs. I mean that in actual fact it was far from sharp, the knob was not turned to where it would have been sharp, and anyone watching the credits should have been able to see that. (After the credits, which have words on screen that are easy to see if they’re sharp or not, it can be a lost cause in many theaters to get someone to see that there is a problem with the focus. But in this showing, it should have been evident throughout the screening that it wasn’t in focus). I talked to the lady manager twice about it and she said that it was fine, she had looked on her walk thru the theater after my first complaint and there was no problem. And that the projectionist had looked and he or she said there was no problem. Whoever that projectionist was should use binoculars to focus, get better glasses, or get out of the business.

Seriously. PLEASE show the movies in reasonably sharp focus and have employees who are able to do so! And no, most audience members will not notice a film being even significantly out of focus, but that is not a good reason to show films that way.

Al Alvarez
Al Alvarez on August 19, 2006 at 2:00 am

The recommended industry sound level is FAR too loud for most multiplexes causing customer complaints and sound bleed to other screens. It is not uncommon for managers and projectionists to lower sound levels once the run gets going as a result. In some cases low dialogue scenes get lost in order to avoid clearing the house everytime the music swells to idiotic levels or something explodes on screen. A recent example of this bad mixing is SUPERMAN RETURNS, which goes back and forth for no apparent reason since the dramatic fluctuations cannot justify the dialogue spoken nor action scenes, though it does keep one awake when there is no real plot unfolding and no has anything interesting to say. The thing is better watched in mono. You may experience the same thing at home on DVD on some films where you keep having to raise and lower the sound.

A footnote on the now legendary BACKDRAFT story, reel change misses were daily events at the Ziegfeld. Only BACKDRAFT made international news because the wrong reel went on and Billy Baldwin had a fit in front of the press.

If you do a professional sound check, tie the curtain up, put in a new lamp and run a platter built-up show through on a dry run, chances are you will not get embarrassed by an incompetent projectionist or gremlins at a premiere. That (and my little story above) is how the Ziegfeld ended showing movies the way it does.

JodarMovieFan
JodarMovieFan on August 18, 2006 at 12:44 pm

Of all the discussion threads, this is the liveliest by far! I have a question, for the projectionists, that is off topic for the Ziegfeld but is pertinent I think to the movie going experience.

What determines the sound levels set for the audience in a theater? Is it based on the number of tickets sold? Or does management/projectionist/attendant set the level for a show? I have noticed that if a movie is sold out and the house is packed, the sound levels are almost always up loud as opposed to when there are maybe a handful where the sound level is sometimes minimal. It seems that way. In the THX certified theaters I go to, they seem to be consistent with the sound level whether its packed or a much smaller group. I have also noticed that if the sound level isn’t high enough, you lose some of the subtleties in the soundtrack that could be drowned out by audience noise and bad theater acoustics.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on August 18, 2006 at 11:07 am

Vito: I guess we won’t be seeing you at the Ziegfeld this fall. But we can still, as Jesse Jackson used to say, keep hope alive. They already have those two 35/70mm projectors up there – what’s wrong with giving them a little workout once in a while?

Vito
Vito on August 18, 2006 at 9:00 am

Ed..Something tells me I would mot be welcome in that booth, I have a feeling they like things just the way they are.

Jeff.. you have a reel end alarm at home? Thats marvelous!
I have a pair of em in my basement they, ahem.. found their way into my bag when we cleaned out the booth at the Staten Island Paramount I took marquee letters spelling out my name as well.

Bill.. only if they run reel-to-reel, I am just to irritated that they would use a platter. Yeah, I know, I’m a stubborn old man, but I am a big lover of tradition and what is right, oh, and a lovable one as well.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on August 17, 2006 at 11:02 am

Yes, Vito… Then march up to the projection booth and give the operator a good shaming ear-full. Of course, he’s probably just a victim of circumstance himself. Maybe you can commiserate with him and then report back to us if the guy seems like a pro who would rise to the challenge of a proper road show presentation, if given the opportunity.

JeffS
JeffS on August 17, 2006 at 11:00 am

Bill, every so often, and it is rare, the reel alarm will keep dinging. For some reason the ball does not fall out of the track and stays inside the bell. It seems the only way to stop it is to rotate the reel backwards a few turns. I have had it happen to me. Most times it’s after it’s triggered at the end but keeps going. I’ve had it happen at start of reel, but I stop the machine to correct it and start up again. It would be hard to do that at a live show.

It’s just never happened when you’ve been over. It always functions correctly. It’s an amazing device, so simple and so accurate.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on August 17, 2006 at 10:57 am

They did have a curtain at the Rivoli, but they didn’t always use it. They kept it open with the lights down during the overture for “Cleopatra”, and I had no idea why all those yellow scratch marks were squiggling around up there on the screen. I was around 10 then, and didn’t know that the music was actually printed on the film itself. But it made for a good memory (which I haven’t thought about in many years).

Vito, hope you can make it into NYC for a Ziegfeld show when the classics start again.

JeffS
JeffS on August 17, 2006 at 10:55 am

Vito, I have a reel alarm on my machine at home. Even though I only have a single machine, I wanted to hear the sound to remind me of the days at my G'dad’s theater. I felt the machine wasn’t complete without a changeover bell.

“Ding-Ding-Ding”

Vito
Vito on August 17, 2006 at 10:48 am

Nice hearing from you Bill, Oh and yes, I miss that too. Did the Rivoli have a curtain? If so did they ever do a Delux, meaning the curtain would close at the end of the first feature and then open to the start of the second feature. As for that renegade reel end alarm, that actually happened to me on more than one occasion. I can still hear that damm bell ringing in my head.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on August 17, 2006 at 10:26 am

In my old neighborhood theater, the Rivoli in Rutherford NJ, they often showed double features right up against each other without a moment’s break. The last shot of the first feature would change over directly to the studio logo of the second feature on the other projector. Sounds strange, but I kinda miss that.

When “The Exorcist” was re-released in 70mm at the Warner Twin (formerly the Strand), the reel alarm was broken and we heard the ding-ding-ding throughout the entire picture.

Vito
Vito on August 17, 2006 at 8:44 am

Gee William, five changeovers a day. I’ll bet you did not miss any. I had a similar situation at Century’s Green Acres on Long Island when it was a triplex, we were running “War Games” in 70mm on a platter and the Will Rogers collection trailer was in 35mm. So I also had five changeovers a day. By the way, The Green Acres, when it was a single screen, was one of a few locations on Long Island with three projectors in the booth. Century had three at, Green Acres, Plainview and Route 110 drive-in. UA had three projectors at the Calderone. Now-a-days must theatres have only one.
I would agree with you, I’d love to see them fire up the #2 machine at the Ziegfeld, run a show reel-to-reel and see what happens. Can ya hear the ding-ding-ding? Oh for those of you who may not be aware of what we are writing about, ding-ding-ding refers to the sound of the reel end alarm which would sound about 2 minutes before the end of the reel to alert (wake up?) the projectionist to an upcoming changeover.
I also do not understand, as Jeff has stated, how they missed all those changeovers, it just seems so hard to comprehend. Of course in the roadshow days, after running a print for several weeks and up to a year, you pretty well knew when the cues were coming. Oh how I remember the butterflies in my stomach the first couple of times we ran a print to a packed house waiting for those cues, afraid to blink. Good times!