Rivoli Theatre

1620 Broadway,
New York, NY 10019

Unfavorite 50 people favorited this theater

Showing 426 - 450 of 1,004 comments

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on November 21, 2008 at 10:19 am

Those are the oldest actual newspaper pages I had. I probably saved them because of the Beatles ads.

William
William on November 21, 2008 at 10:11 am

Thanks, that would make sense for that size ad that many weeks into the engagement. Mid week ads were smaller that the Fri-Sun versions.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on November 21, 2008 at 9:55 am

It was a Wednesday (8/11/65).

William
William on November 21, 2008 at 9:25 am

Thanks, Bill
Those were the days. Going to the movies and Broadway in Times Square.

On the “My Fair Lady” ad it was in it’s 11th month at the Criterion out of 88 weeks. What was the day of the week for the paper?

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on November 21, 2008 at 9:02 am

Vito and William: here’s another page from the same 1965 paper which you might not have seen, posted on the Strand and Capitol pages:

View link

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on November 21, 2008 at 8:23 am

I think it’s amusing that “My Fair Lady”, filmed in Super Panavision 70, makes no mention of that in their roadshow ad. I guess in 1965, 70mm was just taken for granted. Those really were the days.

William
William on November 21, 2008 at 7:49 am

Also look at the prices for “The Odd Couple” with a top ticket price of $7.50 and “Hello Dolly” with a top of $9.50.

Vito
Vito on November 21, 2008 at 6:41 am

Great find Bill.
I was working at the Syosset on Long Island that year, I recall it being a good year for 70mm.
Also notice the amasing list of plays on B'way at the same time.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on November 20, 2008 at 7:00 am

Here’s an ad from the long-defunct newspaper the New York Journal-American:

View link

The date is August 11, 1965. Imagine two spectacular Todd-AO films from 20th Century-Fox within a couple of blocks of each other. And you could get “Choice Beatle Tickets” for only $10 – the 1st Shea Stadium concert was held on August 15th.

roxy1927
roxy1927 on September 1, 2008 at 11:02 am

Totally agree.
For those of us who never saw these theaters before they were roadshow houses we still could appreciate their greatness and enjoy their large wonderful screens and 8 track analogue sound.
Though I started going at the very, very end of the roadshow era.
At that point it was almost dead and who wanted to see Tora Tora Tora? I remember the Criterion marquee but wild horses couldn’t drag me in to see it.
Now if I had seen them in their great heyday then it might have been another story.
But really how long did the Roxy last with it’s great proscenium. It seems it did not last through the 30’s before it was being draped over. Same with the Capitol and Loew’s State and possibly the Strand. Didn’t seem any of them lasted too long with their original interiors.
Possibly only the Paramount stayed the same until Vistavision changed it’s interior in the mid 50’s.
And I thought the Criterion stayed the same until it was split in the early 80’s.
Warren maybe you could shed some light on this on the pages of each theater?
It would be great info.

I miss them all but I was too young to have ever seen the Roxy, Capitol or Paramount.
I do remember however walking in front of the doors of the Paramount with my parents when I was a little boy and them pointing it out to me telling me that Frank sinatra used to sing there.
The doors had been whitewashed(remember when they used to do that?) and I guess they were preparing it for demolition.
Now that I remember the few times we went into the city then I probably walked in front of the Astor and Capitol as well but they made no impression as they were just buildings to me.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on August 11, 2008 at 8:59 pm

As sad as the desecration of the Rivoli’s auditorium was, I really wish she was still standing there at 49th and B'way – even if just as she was under UA’s shabby management in the 1980’s. Even with its once gorgeous interior stripped and clad in heavy dark drapes, it was still a great theatre in which one could enjoy a movie on a huge screen.

JSA
JSA on July 15, 2008 at 6:16 pm

Warren,

Thanks for your response from 7/11. Although I’m a fan of the widescreen/roadshow era of the 50’s & 60’s, I also recognize that the drastic interior design changes needed to accomodate the new giant screens did not always work for the best.

JSA

Al Alvarez
Al Alvarez on July 11, 2008 at 7:22 pm

“The Old Man and the Sea” played for only ten weeks, but I am sure WB had a deal even before “SP” came into play.

The Rivoli may have been more attractive due to the extra seats.

roxy1927
roxy1927 on July 11, 2008 at 3:11 pm

Why would the Criterion pull South Pacific for something like The Old Man and the Sea?
It had it for 8 months and probably could have played the film there for another year.
How long did Old Man and the Sea last?

It seems that Todd could have fit the screen initially at the Criterion for Oklahoma which would have caused little damage instead of at the Rivoli. Then Around The World. And after that SP.
And the Rivoli could have roadshowed Ten Commandments quite comfortably.
From what I have read there was no special presentation of it at the Criterion except hard ticket and I believe it wasn’t even shown in real Vistavision!

Al Alvarez
Al Alvarez on July 11, 2008 at 8:32 am

To answer an old question (LeonLeonidoff on Mar 24, 2008 at 1:07pm), “South Pacific” moved here in October 1958 in order to accommodate the roadshow run of WB’s “The Old Man and the Sea” at the Criterion. Magna Distributors, Todd â€"AO and the theatre agreed to pull “Around the World in 80 Days” after two years in order to make room for “SP” with the Todd-AO presentation. The contract for “80 Days” at the Rivoli had run out anyway.

I assume WB would not let the Criterion off the hook and “80 Days” had recently opened other roadshow runs in the greater NY market anyway. It opened a “popular price” run in the city at Loews by Thanksgiving of that year.

JSA
JSA on July 10, 2008 at 7:02 pm

Warren,

In your opinion, do you think that the Todd-AO install was a “hack” job? Or perhaps, with a little more thought and effort, the conversion could have accomodated both the big screen and the integrity of the original architecture?

JSA

mikwalen
mikwalen on July 10, 2008 at 1:03 pm

Thanks REndres! I always though that Panavision and TODD-AO were pretty much the same aspect ratio – I noticed that the images on my dvd’s of FIDDLER and FUNNY GIRL (Panavision) are a wider than the images on the SOM, DOLLY, and STAR! dvd’s. Now I know why!

Although- WEST SIDE STORY was filmed in PANAVISION 70, and on the dvd, the box states that the ratio is 2:20, which is the TODD-AO ratio, right? And indeed, when watching the dvd, you can see that the ratio on the WSS picture looks like the above-mentioned TODD-AO dvd movies. Interesting!

If this got “off topic”, I’m sorry!

RobertEndres
RobertEndres on July 10, 2008 at 8:22 am

MikeJW: The letterboxing on your DVD’s is probably pretty close. All of those films were shot on 65mm film, and when magnetic tracks were overlayed the aspect ratio should be 2.21:l, as opposed to CinemaScope’s 2.55:1 aspect ratio with magnetic tracks and “Foxhole” perfs., or 2.35:1 with optical or mag/optical soundtracks. The picture area on 65mm without the inside two mag tracks would be closer to 35mm, and perhaps a bit of cropping top and bottom was done to fill out the 35mm ratio. Of course, “Oklahoma” was shot with both 35mm and 65mm cameras (since Todd-AO originally used a 30frame/sec. speed vs. 35mm.24 frame/sec) so those aspect ratios would automatically be correct for each format. My laserdisc (remember those?) copy of “Oklahoma” has an extra with both versions placed one over the other so you can see the difference between the formats. If you want more information, Martin Hart’s “Widescreen Museum” mentioned above has tons of fascinating material.

William
William on July 9, 2008 at 3:21 pm

Here is the conversion of the auditorium of the Rivoli for Todd-AO.

View link

roxy1927
roxy1927 on July 9, 2008 at 3:00 pm

Warren was the original proscenium there behind the Todd Ao screen?
If they removed it would the Rivoli have looked the way it was before?
What do you remember seeing before ‘55?
Did you see the original showing of Oklahoma and what was your reaction? Or were you angry because of what they did.

mikwalen
mikwalen on July 9, 2008 at 2:15 pm

I actually work in the area, and I pass that black glass skyscraper frequently. It only occured to me just the other day that it sits on the site of the Rivoli.

I have the dvd’s of many of the Todd-AO films that played there – DOLLY, STAR, SOM – and somehow, I get the feeling that aspect ratio is not exact – I’m sure that the picture area must have been wider than the letter-boxing on those dvds.

markp
markp on July 9, 2008 at 2:09 pm

It WAS beautiful, and its a sin that it was destroyed. This building, along with many other old palaces, were built of brick, mortar and plaster, not like these sheetrock screening rooms they build today.

mikwalen
mikwalen on July 9, 2008 at 1:44 pm

Judging from the photo, it was so beautiful!!

mikwalen
mikwalen on July 9, 2008 at 11:41 am

I will never forget seeing FIDDLER ON THE ROOF at the Rivoli in Summer, 1972. My mom took me into NYC weeks before to order the tix at the box office. While she did that, I looked at the beautiful lobby cards that were on display (remember them?). The film itself, on that screen was mind-blowing. I was 8 years old, and sat through that three hour movie completely in awe.

I only wish I could have seen SOM, STAR!, HELLO DOLLY!, and the other biggies there as well!

roxy1927
roxy1927 on July 1, 2008 at 3:06 pm

With the Wall-E salute to HD(and I am not refering to High Def)
I think I should point out that this was the last genuine 70mm film to open at the Rivoli.
Too bad it was such a failure and only lasted 7 months at the theater. It’s a much better film than the critics gave it credit for and gets better as the years go on.
It should have run at least a year but the people writing reviews then hated musicals. And as Ethan Mordan has written they reviewed these mammoth films as if they were personally billed for them.
How else to explain why they trashed movies like PYW, SC, and HD.
All three are terrific and I only wish we could still see them as they were first seen on their hard ticket runs.
Thank god they were made so we have them and their lavishness to enjoy today.