Walter Reade Theater

165 W. 65th Street,
New York, NY 10023

Unfavorite 27 people favorited this theater

Showing 51 - 66 of 66 comments

hardbop
hardbop on July 11, 2005 at 9:43 am

I know the people who run the Film Forum have nothing but contempt for their counterparts at the Walter Reade. No doubt the FF folks are envious of the greater resources the WR has at its disposal for being part of the Lincoln Center complex, but the FF people feel the WR folks are lazy and don’t use their resources.

I know that it is very rare for the Film Forum to advertise a film then have to announce that they canceled the film because they couldn’t get a print. On the other hand, that is a common occurrence at the WR. They are constantly re-juggling their schedules and often screening inferior 16 mm prints or even video.

In the latest Malle retro they already screwed up THIEF OF PARIS as highlighted above and another one of the Malle docs being screening is a beta copy. I know at the Losey retro they had to cancel several screenings because they couldn’t get prints. And I remember at the Dwan retrospective they screened several 16MM prints.

I could go on and on. I remember when they had those discount matinees underwritten by the Times that were geared for families they screened a TV print of THE GREAT RACE. The film was about an hour short of the advertised running time. And I went to another screening of BETWEEN THE LINES and they projected video; I left.

umbaba
umbaba on July 10, 2005 at 7:26 am

Somebody at WR obviously didn’t do his/her job…the telling of a downslide in quality..

Truthfully…for me at least…“Thief” is one of my all-time greatest flicks…I would have loved to see a pristine print of that..would have a been a great surprise

PeterApruzzese
PeterApruzzese on July 6, 2005 at 11:34 am

Wow – that’s embarrasing! I wonder if the print came in too late to pre-screen or at least inspect before the show.

hardbop
hardbop on July 6, 2005 at 11:24 am

I don’t think the Bing Crosby retro will draw flies. Series that show classic Hollywood films at the WR generally don’t draw. They do better at places like AMMI and MoMA where you can buy a membership and then get in for free. I think they could screen film that showed a cow munching on grass for two hours and they would draw a crowd at MoMA. I think some of the people who patronize that place live there.

Speaking of the WR, I was there on Sunday for the 1 p.m. showing of THIEF OF PARIS and the print comes on and I see the UA logo. I made a mental note to myself and say “I didn’t know UA distributed TOP” and then you see the title THIEF and hear Tangerine Dream on the soundtrack. I yell out “It is the wrong movie.” Well, needless to say, they stopped the screening and decided to substitute MY DINNER WITH ANDRE. They were shipped the wrong print, Michael Mann’s “THIEF.” I got a refund, but thought that the WR could have done more to accommodate the people who were inconvenienced by giving free passes or something. After all, we were inconvenienced. And the manager didn’t solicit any opinions on what should be screened. She just announced that they would screen “Andre” when I assume they had a variety of Malle prints to choose from. I probably would have stayed if they screen THIEF. It was a pristine print.

This is the second time this has happened recently. MoMA cancelled its screening of SHEER MADNESS in the Hanna Shuygulla retro and substituted a non-subtitled Marco Ferrari film instead.

umbaba
umbaba on July 4, 2005 at 6:48 am

I think the $10 ticket price is a factor also plus, forgive me for saying, but many French films tend to move a little slow…I went to see “Atlantic City” cause it’s a classic and it has Burt. However, I made sure to get there early because I expected it to be a long line….to my satisfaction, there wasn’t, just got my ticket and walked in….I wonder how the Bing Crosby series will do?

br91975
br91975 on July 3, 2005 at 10:10 am

Art-house audiences have become almost as fickle as mainstream audiences, it seems. I can’t remember any specific examples offhand, but there have been a handful of specialty titles which opened to solid reviews but, poof!, in a week or three, they were completely out of theatres. Guess sometimes there’s little accounting for what people will see and what they won’t see…

hardbop
hardbop on July 3, 2005 at 9:08 am

Hmmm. I didn’t notice any deterioration in the Walter Reade. I’ve been attending some of the Louis Malle retro screenings and it isn’t drawing all that well. French films at the Walter Reade usually are a tough ticket (try getting a ticket to the annual Rendez-vous With French Cinema ticket; even weekday afternoon screenings in that series sell out.) And I can remember going to a French series in the mid 1990s in the summer and not being able to get into “Police” because it sold out.

I have absolutely no feel for what draws/what doesn’t draw in the revival houses. I thought they would line up down the block to get a chance to see all of Malle’s output on the big screen.

chconnol
chconnol on June 27, 2005 at 6:50 am

What the hell is it with theaters NOT using the friggin' curtains anymore? Are there ANY places in NYC that DO use them?

umbaba
umbaba on June 27, 2005 at 5:41 am

I was first at the Walter Reade in 2003 for a double (separate admission of course….which was a bummer) for “Wind and the Lion' and "Once Upon a Time in the West” (beat up print, but sold out house and a great experience. The curtain opened and closed, it was an awesome time, and a nice size screen.

This past weekend I saw “Atlantic City” with a brief lecture before hand. The print was clean and it was great seeing Burt Lancaster on the big screen again. It was a good time….my only gripe??….the theater seems to be slowly dilapidating…..the curtain remained open, no presentation like experience, the walls have stains on them and there’s a certain dank like appearance…isn’t it time for the Reade to have a makeover or cleanup??? It’s too good a theater.

YMike
YMike on May 20, 2005 at 2:28 pm

The Film Forum’s retro was solely Powell/Pressburger films.

hardbop
hardbop on May 20, 2005 at 12:27 pm

They screened five or six of the quota quickies at this retro, but I skipped them. The WR also did a Powell retro back in ‘93 then Film Forum mounted one in '95. The Film Forum’s retro might have been solely Powell/Pressburger films.

I’d like to know why THE ELUSIVE PIMPERNAL is not screening.

Gerald A. DeLuca
Gerald A. DeLuca on May 20, 2005 at 12:21 pm

MoMA did a Powell retrospective in the 1970s. I attended a large number of those, including the ones you mention above and even some of the early British “quota quickies.”

hardbop
hardbop on May 20, 2005 at 12:02 pm

I must have skipped the Italian series, probably because I’m not a big fan of the silents. Right now the WR is mounting a massive, if not quite complete retro, of Michael Powell’s films. I plan to head there tonight for ILL MET BY MOONLIGHT and THE BATTLE OF THE GRAF SPREE, both of which I’ve seen on video only. One strange omission in the WR retro is THE ELUSIVE PIMPERNAL, which, for some reason is not screening.

Gerald A. DeLuca
Gerald A. DeLuca on May 20, 2005 at 11:53 am

I was particularly impressed with the silent Italian diva series in late 2000. They showed marvelous prints of rare movies made with legendary stars such as Francesca Bertini, Leda Gys, Pina Menichelli, Lyda Borelli, Mercedes Brignone, Carmene Boni, Italia Almirante Manzini, and others…even Eleonora Duse in her sole film “Cenere.” Live piano accompaniment was provided for each of the films, even mandolin and voice for a couple of pictures, as I remember. A terrific souvenir boooklet was available for sale.

hardbop
hardbop on May 20, 2005 at 11:32 am

I was here at the opening. I remember that those who held Film Society of Lincoln Center memberships were entitled to a free screening. One of the films was a Woody Allen film, whatever one was new at the time. The film I opted to see was Erroll Morris' documentary, A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME. There may have been another choice or two.

In any event, one thing that drives me nuts about the Walter Reade and some of the other repertory houses is the fact that when they run a retro that spans more than one calendar month the monthly calendar doesn’t list all the films in the program.

In June, the Walter Reade is mounting a mammoth Louis Malle retro, but it spans the end of June and runs well into July. However, the WR’s June program only lists the Malle films through the end of June.

I much prefer the way AMMI & the Film Forum do their calendars; they include all films in a series as opposed to the WR and MoMA, which print calendars each month.

RobertR
RobertR on December 23, 2004 at 2:16 pm

There will be a screening of a new 70mm print of Jacques Tati’s “Playtime” December 29 to January 5th.