Loew's Jersey Theatre

54 Journal Square,
Jersey City, NJ 07306

Unfavorite 98 people favorited this theater

Showing 901 - 925 of 1,501 comments

Alto
Alto on July 17, 2006 at 7:25 pm

Apparently, it is presentable enough for a celebrity photo shoot…

From the “It’s Old News But So What” department:

A friend of mine, a Jersey City resident, just informed me that singer Tony Bennett was recently photographed here, seated at a Yamaha grand piano on the grand dame’s stage. According to him, the images are to appear in the August 2006 issue of Vanity Fair magazine – fabulous!

A May 20th message posted on vanityfair.com’s “V.F. Dish forum”
(at View link) supports this story -
it refers to a news item published in The Jersey Journal on May 19th (I didn’t read it though – access to their older articles online is fee-based).

Now, how about Tony Bennett LIVE IN CONCERT on the Loew’s Jersey stage?

A legendary theatre deserves a legendary performer â€" perhaps Mr. Bennett has already considered this.

One can only hope and dream…

ThePhotoplayer
ThePhotoplayer on July 15, 2006 at 1:48 pm

Find them a Wonder Loews that’s presentable and has movie equipment installed and I’m sure they’d he happy to have a premier there.

ThePhotoplayer
ThePhotoplayer on July 15, 2006 at 1:45 pm

Find them a Wonder Loews in presentable condition with projector equipment and I’m sure they’d be happy to have their premier there.

rlvjr
rlvjr on July 8, 2006 at 10:37 pm

QUESTION: Is the movie business dead today? ANSWER: No, millions of people pay $9.50 to $10.50 to see a movie, and a strong opening weekend draws in excess of $100 million. Is there any reason why ONE motion picture company couldn’t try opening ONE film at Loew’s Jersey rather than the multiplex? Multiplexes are ratholes, not truly loved by the public; only tolerated.
When Disney restored the NEW AMSTERDAM, they played the Tarzan movie there (prior to Lion King). It drew lots of people, even me, from Virginia. The last BIG movie I saw at a real LOEW’S theatre was Empire Strikes Back. Not ancient history. Top price. Full house.

mahermusic
mahermusic on July 1, 2006 at 6:39 pm

Life’s too short: It’s because that during the restoration of the Jersey’s exterior, It was found that the steelwork inside the brick/terra cotta tower was too far gone and structually unsound after years of water leaks to safely hold the weight of another vertical sign akin to the one that was originally there.

Funny but true story: During the terra cotta restoration, the smaller, left tower (as you look at the front of the Jersey) was entered and surveyed as to what needed to be restored and protected. When the larger, right tower was entered, everyone was aghast at what they found: The innards of the tower were completely filled with old, original steel girders, utilizing MUCH more steel than possibly necessary for a skeleton for a brick and terra cotta tower. Everyone forgot that there was a huge vertical “Loew’s Jersey” vertical sign hanging off the tower 40 years prior! (Well, forgot for a few hours anyway) True story.

Life's Too Short
Life's Too Short on July 1, 2006 at 4:26 pm

maher: is that because there is an ordinance that prohibits construction of a large vertical sign nowadays?

mahermusic
mahermusic on June 18, 2006 at 7:29 pm

Original marquee is a possibility, although it would probably take underwriting from a corporation, or a MAJOR grant that is specifically awarded for “Restoration of the Loew’s Jersey Marquee”.

Vertical marquee will not be reconstructed.

ShortyC
ShortyC on June 18, 2006 at 7:15 pm

After the necessary restorations are done, is there any idea of putting back the vertical marquee and well as said restoring the original marquee?

mahermusic
mahermusic on June 18, 2006 at 6:10 pm

JohnMessick: The Jersey’s marquee has been changed twice from the original (middle was a streamlined boxey affair with more moving neon up the edges). We have pictures of this in the archives. The current marquee is the third incarnation. But, what I’m getting at is that the original marquee, or at least the underside of it, is still present. When Loews changed the marquees from the originals, they basically changed only the three sides facing the street. Next time you’re at the Jersey, look up under the marquee, and you’ll see the “curved hat” shape of the original marquee. Yes, there are lights in the three coves under the marquee.

Resoration to the original marquee has been discussed, but it is MUCH further down on the list of priorities. Fire escape restoration… Loge, Mezzanine and Balcony seating restoration… higher up on the list.

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on June 18, 2006 at 5:57 pm

I thoroughly enjoyed the A&E special but was left wanting more. Much More!!!!! The theaters are incredibly special and represent an architectural legacy that will never be duplicated. That all five of these theaters still exist is a miracle, but this show could easily have done a hour or more devoted to their history and current states of condition. It was truly uplifting to see what has been done by voulnteers to rescue the Jersey. Why can’t the same be done for the Kings! It is already owned by the city. The borough presidents office could easily earmark discretionary funds to jumpstart this project and Brooklyn corporate sponsors could be enlisted as well.

I was disappointed that we saw virtually none of the 175th St. theater in this special. I also was surprised that they didn’t devote more to the Paradise since it has just been reopened. I wanted to see more of the architectual details. I am recording the Daddy Yankee concert tonight to see if they show more!

Maybe I would never have been satified no matter how much they showed! :–)

I was great to see these theaters given the attention they desparately need if we are to preserve them for future generations.

Has someone set up a Friend’s of Loew’s Kings organization? If not, would the people at Friend’s of Loew’s in New Jersey help the people of Brooklyn set up a similar organization?

JohnMessick
JohnMessick on June 18, 2006 at 5:35 pm

I watched the A&E program Breakfast with the Arts. I enjoyed very much seeing the Loews King and Jersey theaters. I do have one question. Will the marquee on the Jersey be restored to what is shown on the vintage picture on this page? I hope that that is listed on the “to do ” list.

Alto
Alto on June 18, 2006 at 4:29 pm

I forget to mention Theater Historical Society of America in previous post – thank you too!

Orlando – I LOVE the way you made a point of advocating public awareness and support for saving, preserving, “respecting” and “fighting for” our classic theaters, especially during the segment on the Kings!

Alto
Alto on June 18, 2006 at 3:58 pm

I am glad to see that they placed extra emphasis on the Kings and Jersey Theatres, since these two are in the most “need” of public awareness and support (and the ability to get an “insider’s” look at the Kings was a rare treat – there is no reason why it couldn’t live on, serving Brooklyn as a performing arts center).

I was surprised that no interior footage of Loew’s 175th was shot â€" that place is supposed to be in immaculate condition, and I thought “Reverend Ike” welcomed film crews and public access.

The documentary was well-researched and very comprehensive, with many of our Cinema Treasures “regulars” (such as Ross Melnick, Orlando Lopes, Bruce Friedman, Warren Harris…) contributing with interviews and stories. Also nice to see the Museum of the Moving Image and Friends of the Loew’s involved and credited. You were all great!

However, one very interesting point was left out that might leave viewers “wondering”: why did every borough of NYC have a “Wonder Theatre” except Staten Island, and why was it decided to locate the fifth theater in Jersey City instead?

With regards to Staten island, my understanding is: (1) its population at the time was comparatively too sparse (it was considered “rural”) and (2) there were already enough theaters serving the area; therefore, the “market area” was considered “saturated” and unable to support such a large theater, making it economically unfeasible.

Was Jersey City chosen for population density? Or access to rail transportation?
(The Journal Square location seems particularly odd, considering that the much larger Stanley Theater opened just the year before across the street.)

Poor Staten Island…treated like the forgotten stepchild and always getting “shortchanged”. Passed over for… New Jersey (of all places)!

mahermusic
mahermusic on June 18, 2006 at 5:21 am

The five Wonder Theatres were featured on A&E’s Sunday morning program “Breakfast with the Arts” today. Real nice segment, with extensive info on the Jersey and Kings. Maybe check the TV guides for rerun times.

rhett
rhett on June 10, 2006 at 5:41 am

IRV…

I love the Lafayette Screenings…I’ve been going since they began…but unfortunately, yes, there are many talkers, cellphones and rudeness.Many that offend are the older crowd. When I saw “Mutiny on the Bounty” there was a group of middle aged regulars who were friends of the owner (I saw them all commiserating in the lobby) and they had a comment on every scene for the first 15 minutes (they thought they were clever but they were just obnoxious),,,finally I leaned over and said “Hey guys, do you mind?”…they stopped talking at that point as I guess they might have felt embarrassed about being disruptive…I’ve shushed many at the Lafayette….never young people….but , what can you do

Theaterat
Theaterat on June 6, 2006 at 7:20 am

Lifes too short... The Jersey charges 6.00 for adults and 4.00 for seniors and children. To see a double feature costs 10.00 for adults and 7,00 for seniors and children. A decent deal, especially when compared toplex prices, Go!

Life's Too Short
Life's Too Short on June 5, 2006 at 8:33 pm

550!! That’s a decent crowd! What do they charge, 5 bucks or something? That’s not bad at all! I’m very excited to hear this. Honestly, I have been a skeptic of this classic movie thing. But maybe it works!

Theaterat
Theaterat on June 5, 2006 at 11:13 am

Life`s Too Short… A good “guestimate” would be about 550 people.Out of the 4 blocks of seats in the orchestra, the center 2 contained the most people. There were many people sitting in the first few rows, but I generally sit about 2 thirds the way behind the screen in the left side of the 2 central seating areas.Good show with a good crowd.

Life's Too Short
Life's Too Short on June 4, 2006 at 8:38 pm

Nice photos above! Theaterat: question for you regarding your post of June 4. How many people would you say attended the Jaws screening you describe?

evmovieguy
evmovieguy on June 4, 2006 at 8:05 pm

I unfortunately didn’t make it to any of the screenings this past weekend. Oh well..gotta wait ‘til the Fall.

Not to rain on anybody’s parade regarding the two above comments by Theaterat an RobertR about theater etiquette, but it’s not always the case that people behave at these revival screenings. You think it would be, but it’s not. I’m glad that people behaved at your shows. In the past I have encountered some real loud-mouth, rude people during Loews Jersey screenings and at Lafayette Theater screenings. No respect for anybody, just alot of loud conversation and in one of the cases, loud belching. And these were men well into their 40s, maybe 50s. Anyway..the point it is, don’t be surprised if you happen to cross paths with the obnoxious element that also attend these screenings. They’re out there!!

RobertR
RobertR on June 4, 2006 at 12:20 pm

People who attend these shows are going out of their way to attend a classic film in a landmark palace. They still have respect for film going and how to watch a movie. It’s a credit to those with kids that not one of them disrupted the audience. I saw one young family with four kids under 12 and they sat and watched the film like all the rest of us. Nice to see folks who raise kids who don’t run all over the theatre while the parents pretend not to notice so they can watch the film. I recently saw Poseidon in IMAX and this girl kept acting up in the theatre and kept cursing her mother until she gave her money for candy and video games. She never came back and must have spent the rest of the show in the lobby (the mother didn’t seem to care. She was like 12, should have been over the tantrum stage.

Theaterat
Theaterat on June 4, 2006 at 11:49 am

Saw “Jaws” Sat 6-3 at the Jersey.Absolutely great to see it on the big screen again.Even though it was a damp rainy evening for some reason the non-working air conditioning did not seem to matter because the theater was comparitively cool. This was one of the best attended shows that bI have ever seen over here. There were plenty of young children and they were well behaved. And it was a pleasure NOT to hear those obnoxious cell phones ringing. Seems the patrons here are respectful of the rights of others and that is just fine with me. Now if the patrons of the multiplexes behaved the same way, prehaps I would start to go again- providing there is something worth seeing!

Mike (saps)
Mike (saps) on June 3, 2006 at 10:04 pm

I didn’t see these screenings but I have really enjoyed others in the past.

RobertR
RobertR on June 3, 2006 at 9:57 pm

The Grease print tonight and Jaws were both top notch. I noticed one projector has a clearere brighter picture then the other. Tonights show though was great. Can’t wait until the fall for more classics.

xfrql
xfrql on June 2, 2006 at 11:29 pm

Well, I just typed out a long comment but I didn’t log in first so I think it’s gone. Suffice to say, most of the film tonight (Graffiti) was not in very good focus despite my mentioning this to 2 volunteers after half an hour. The first half of the credits were sharp, then the image went soft, so that is human error, not just equipment. The sound was muffled. The top of the screen was showing the bottom of the frame for almost half an hour till I mentioned it and the focus- but the focus was not corrected. Sorry guys.