Rivoli Theatre

1620 Broadway,
New York, NY 10019

Unfavorite 50 people favorited this theater

Showing 951 - 975 of 1,004 comments

BoxOfficeBill
BoxOfficeBill on November 11, 2004 at 11:48 am

CConnolly—
The review for “China Syndrome” (by Vincent Canby, mentioning its opening at Loews' State 2) is reprinted photostatically (along with every other NYT film review from 1913-89)in the six-volume “New York Times Film Reviews,” available in well-stocked libraries. Reviews from the ‘nineties to the present are not yet in print. My library supplements the NYT reviews with more recent ones from “Variety,” which has likewise collected its reviews in multi-volume format. In NYC, the NY Public, the Lenox, and the Lincoln Center Libraries likely have these volumes (along with Columbia U and NYU, if you can gain access). Elsewhere, seek out the best university research library you can get to.

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on November 11, 2004 at 10:15 am

Well considering that the Music Hall is now being used for singing midgets, Barney and the Rugrats it might as well be the world’s largest Cosco for all it contributes to New York’s culteral life. And when you think of the Roxy, Paramount and the Capitol the Beacon is practically a boobie prize.
These theaters could not have paid their own way but does Carnegie Hall or any of the theaters in Lincoln Center? Why couldnt the Rivoli have been used for the Jazz theater that just went up in columbus circle or the Strand been used for a new home for the New York City Opera which they now want to build. What about the stuff that goes on at the Theater at Madison Square Garden couldn’t they have done that at Loew’s State?
I’m sure the old Penn Station was pretty impractical too. All that open space. What a waste!

RobertR
RobertR on November 11, 2004 at 10:02 am

The Rivoli and Capitol could surely have been used for legitimate theatre and concerts. I for one was never thrilled by the Beacon. The Rivoli and Capitol were classy houses. They tore down the Capitol and built the very sterile Uris (now the Gershwin). The loss of the Rivoli is a sin, they should have tore down the Ziegfeld instead. To me it’s a movie palace imposter, but it’s all we have so at least it’s something.

chconnol
chconnol on November 11, 2004 at 9:30 am

You know…reading all about these old NY movie houses and stuff got me to thinking a lot about how areas rise and fall and such. It’s been a bit of a learning experience on this site and others as I’m fascinated by old buildings especially theaters. It comes mainly from my parents who grew up in Manhattan during the 1930’s and 40’s. Their recollections of midtown and especially of the glorious theaters instilled an interest in me that exists to this day. They spoke especaily fondly of The Roxy saying that it put Radio City Music Hall to shame.

From this site I’ve come to the conclusion that I’m sure others have long since made: that the decline of the great theaters of the Times Square area were caused by a decline in the movie going audiences and by the radical change in the way films were released. Why would audiences schlep all the way into Manhattan anymore when the same movie would be playing maybe a town or two away in the ‘burbs? So the theater’s audiences declined starting in the mid to late 70’s and really tanked in the 1970’s. There were still property taxes to pay and other expenses so some of the lesser theaters turned to porn. These theater dinosaurs had long since passed their useful lives. Somehow, somone realized that the property that these theaters were sitting on were valuable and could be redeveloped. And that redevelopment, which destroyed so many of these grand theaters, has, whether one likes to admit it or not, revitalized the Times Square area. Is Times Square REALLY as exciting as my parents described it? No, at least I don’t think so. My parents described Times Square in the 40’s as a kind of amusement park where there was everything to do on a Friday night: movies, plays, some vaudeville, some burlesque, novelty acts and nightclubs. Now? It’s kind of sterile, yes, but it sure draws the crowds.

What I think I’m saying (and could’ve said shorter, I apologize) is that while it’s sad that these beautiful movie houses are gone, it had to be done for the area (and NY) to move on. Think about it: let’s say the Roxy, The Capitol and The Rivoli had somehow managed to stay open. What use could be possibly made these days for these theaters? Maybe, just maybe the Roxy could’ve become a Concert hall or something but who knows if the place was built acoustically for this? There simply isn’t the demand for the entertainment venues that would’ve kept these places alive. The only option I’ve ever thought of is why builders couldn’t or didn’t build above or around some of these theaters. BUT…an engineer friend of mine explained it simply that the open areas of these theaters would’ve made this absolutely impossible.

Let’s be thankful that we do still have some of the old, great house still with us like Radio City, Beacon and others.

Sorry for the rant.

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on November 11, 2004 at 9:08 am

Guys we now have the Virgin Megastore in Times Square and the Time Warner building in Columbus Circle not to mention the Toys Are Us skyscraper being built on the Hearst building over on 8th Av. What a glorious period in New York’s architectural history we are living in!

RobertR
RobertR on November 11, 2004 at 8:09 am

Your right about it being on the dark side, so was the downstairs house.

chconnol
chconnol on November 11, 2004 at 8:02 am

Maybe run down is a little harsh. It was rather gloomy upstairs. Very dark even before the movie started. And there appeared to be large holes in the wall just outside the entrance to the theater with these very large cables running into them most likely for a sound system or something. I wouldn’t necessarily call it run down but in need of refurbishment.

RobertR
RobertR on November 10, 2004 at 4:03 pm

Wow I’m suprised Loews State looked run down, I am not sure the last time I was there but last time I was it still looked regal. What a loss that it’s gone now.

chconnol
chconnol on November 10, 2004 at 3:11 pm

RobertR: I’m certain it was the Loew’s State now. The location is where I remember it and I’ve seen pictures on the web and I’m 99% sure of it. I remember the theater was VERY dark even though the movie hadn’t started. I think I’m mistaken about the wall. From the pictures I’ve seen, the pitch of the auditorium matches perfectly with my recollections.

Thanks to everyone. A long (ridiculous) obsession has ended.

RobertR
RobertR on November 10, 2004 at 2:30 pm

This has to be the Demille, the balcony was very steep and halved down the middle.

chconnol
chconnol on November 10, 2004 at 2:30 pm

Yes, funny but I meant to write back and say it must’ve been the State because after 25 years, I can remember that as we stood looking at the movie theater’s entrance, my back was open to Times Square. The Embassy 2/¾ is right on 7th where it “closes” up to a regular avenue and it didn’t feel right. And when I checked the descriptions of the State on this site, it fit.

Regarding “split down the middle” I simply remember that the angle of the seats was VERY VERY steep. I don’t think this could’ve been the orchestra section. I might be mistaken that the balcony was split, though, into two theaters. Was the second theater the balcony? That’s where we must’ve seen it. It was a very ornate theater. I remember the stage area had a tremendous arch to it. Again, we’re talking 25 years ago so some of my memories are faded.

To think that the monstrous nothingness of the Virgin Megastore is what replaced it!

BoxOfficeBill…how did you manage to find the listing for this movie?

BoxOfficeBill
BoxOfficeBill on November 10, 2004 at 11:04 am

CConnolly—
“The China Syndrome” opened at Loews' State 2 on 15 March 1979. That was a bigger theater than the Mayfair/DeMille/Embassy234. But what do you mean by “split down the middle”?

Mikeoaklandpark
Mikeoaklandpark on November 8, 2004 at 11:19 am

The Embassy is the old Demille. I think the insdie was kept the same even thought they took some away from the outsdie and I would assume lobby. I know they spliut the balcony in two and I think the downstairs was lef tthe same. The only thing I rememebr from sownstairs is they removed the stage. When Guild took it over they used the same curtains that were on the stage of the Demille,

chconnol
chconnol on November 8, 2004 at 11:09 am

Hmmmmm…RoberR you might be right. The thing that I clearly remember was that the theater was very ornate and (I think) we walked up a flight of stairs. Not totally run down but rough around the edges. We must’ve been in the old balcony section because there was a definate and extremely noticable incline (very, very steep) that would not have been part of the orchestra section. And if this was the balcony, GOD it was HUGE.

So the Embassy 2-3-4 is the existing theater on 7th that is advertising for rent, right? That (ironically) would be the theater that I inquired about on the listing here for the Roxy. It doesn’t seem that big from viewing it outside though. I wish there was a way to go back and look at old theater listings to see. Ah, the things some people (like me) obsess about.

RobertR
RobertR on November 8, 2004 at 10:34 am

It was not the Rivoli, which was split up and down. Suprisingly UA never let the Rivoli run down, it was kept up to the end. I think you may have seen it on a moveover at the Embassy 2-3-4. I believe it first opened at Loews State.

chconnol
chconnol on November 8, 2004 at 10:21 am

In April or May of 1979, I saw “The China Syndrome” in an old movie house that had been split down the middle. I wish to God I knew what theater it was. I could tell when I saw it that it was a grand old theater but it was in pretty bad shape then. I think it might’ve been the Rivoli but I can’t tell. I know for sure it was in the Times Square area, it was huge and ornate and it was during the spring of 1979. I know this sounds stupid but is there anyway anyone can tell me which theater I was in?

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on November 8, 2004 at 9:24 am

The Rivoli stood between 49th and 50th on Broadway with the marquee facing out just like the Winter Garden a block above. The black glass skyscraper which stands on its site is so ugly I can’t even walk by it. The destruction of the Rivoli was legalized architectural and cultural vandalism which should have had the architect and developer thrown in jail for the destruction of a New York treasure.

chconnol
chconnol on November 8, 2004 at 9:03 am

I’m having a hard time picturing where this theater actually was. I work right in the area so was the Rivoli (roughly) where “Carolines” is now? If that’s so, Jesus…that’s a small parcel alright. And yes, the buildings that stand there now are awful.

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on October 28, 2004 at 9:50 am

Does anyone know the exact years in the sixties the Rivoli utilized a flat screen for their 70mm/Todd AO presentations and does anyone have a photo of the interior with this screen? It’s hard to imagine West Side Story, Cleopatra and SOM “flat” in this theater.

dave-bronx™
dave-bronx™ on October 27, 2004 at 10:37 pm

What is the origin of the name ‘Rivoli’?

br91975
br91975 on September 29, 2004 at 11:06 pm

The Rivoli/UA Twin closed in June of 1987, with one of its final offerings being the Jon Cryer comedy ‘Morgan Stewart’s Coming Home’. Demolition on the building began barely a month later, right around if not at the same time the Strand/Warner Twin and/or Loew’s State were being torn down.

BoxOfficeBill
BoxOfficeBill on August 12, 2004 at 10:04 pm

Yes, Bryan K— that’s a wonderful bunch of photos from Fall ‘55. The earlier CinemaScope screen dated from December '53, with “King of the Khyber Rifles,” a Tyrone Power TCF film that followed “The Robe” (at the Roxy) and “How to Marry a Millionaire” (at the Globe and Loew’s State) and then “Beneath the Twelve Mile Reef” (at the Roxy) into distribution. The Rivoli installed its MiracleMirror CinemaScope-capable screen in Summer '53, when I saw there Disney’s “Sword and the Rose” (with Glynis Johns as Mary Tudor — Bloody Mary!)in widescreen format. I’m surprised that no one has mentioned the Rivoli’s Cylcoramic screen, which antedated the ToddAO magnification by at least three decades. The first time I saw it was in December 1949, for CB DeMille’s “Samson and Delilah.” The film day-dated at the Paramount, which then offered stage-shows-cum-film. The advertising gimmick declared: “See Stage Show at Paramount, See Cycloramic Screen at Rivoli.” At the age of seven, I knew what a stage show was. I prevailed on my parents to take me to the Rivoli to see what a Cycloramic screen might be. The film started at 10:30 am. So far, no difference. I wondered what it was all about. Then, at 12:20 the screen opened to (at least) twice its size for the Destruction of the Temple scene. Wow! Some folks on this site have expressed their indelible memories of what happened when the screen opened at “This is Cinerama.” For me, the event was at the Rivoli when the screen blew up to an unimaginable size. My parents were not fazed: they had seen it before. I pressed their memories. They cited the climactic horse-race scene in “National Velvet” at Radio City. In the next few years, I recall seeing Magnascope at RCMH for the stampede in “King Solomon’s Mines,” the sea storm in “Plymouth Adventure,” and Busby Berkeley’s aquatic number in “Million Dollar Mermaid.” And, of course, “This Is Cinerama.” But nothing in my memory equals the Destruction of the Temple at the Rivoli. I know that Ben Hall et al. write about Magnascope screens in first-run theaters ca. 1920s-50s. But I know of no others on B’way in the 40s-early 50s, other than the Rivoli and RCMH (the Brooklyn Paramount had a Magnascope screen that it used for “Samson and Delilah,” but I know of no other film that the theater used it for at the turn of that decade). Certainly the Roxy did not use Magnascope. (Ask me why?)

Mike (saps)
Mike (saps) on August 12, 2004 at 7:54 pm

Bryan K, that is an amazing site you linked us to. Thanks!

SethLewis
SethLewis on August 12, 2004 at 7:07 pm

Saw Jaws here before the twinning…a packed house great atmosphere at the Midnight show opening weekend…the saddest part of the Rivoli’s last years was that for the final couple of years United Artists took the Rivoli name off of it and called it simply the United Artists Twin 1 and 2…great for the Chuck Norris pictures it seemed to book

Mark1
Mark1 on August 12, 2004 at 6:15 pm

Flatbush, the best pictures I have seen of the Rivoli interior are the antique post cards, sometimes available on eBay. The Theatre Historical Society had some and can provide black and white photos of them, but didn’t have negatives (tho' that was about 10 years ago, so may have changed). I believe I also got some of the pictures I have of the interior from the Museum of the City of New York, but am not positive. I know I got some things there but may have been for the Rialto.