Beekman Theatre
1254 2nd Avenue,
New York,
NY
10021
1254 2nd Avenue,
New York,
NY
10021
42 people
favorited this theater
Showing 126 - 150 of 402 comments
Hi EdSolero, I too saw “Broadway Danny Rose,” “Purple Rose of Cairo” and “Hannah and Her Sisters” at the Beekman. Also “Manhattan,” “Zelig” and “Manhattan Murder Mystery.” I will always wonder if “Sleeper” or “Annie Hall” played the Beekman.
I added the RKO Keith’s to my favorites, though I have never been there. Hmmm maybe I should head out there with my camera!!
Your photographs are heartbreaking, davebazooka… but I’m glad you’ve taken it upon yourself to document and share these tragic images with all of us on CT. If you want to know the next cinema treasure on the chopping block, check out the comments on the RKO Keith’s page.
I remember seeing a number of movies here at the Beekman, although, contrary to my post of December 12, “Frances” (which I saw during its Oscar-qualifying run at the Cinema I & II in December of ‘82) was not one of them. There were a number of Woody Allen movies such as “Broadway Danny Rose”, “Purple Rose of Cairo” and “Hannah and Her Sisters” as well as the brooding British drama “Brimstone and Treacle” starring rock star Sting, also in '82.
You’re very welcome! Since the Beekman is part of my movie-going past, there is no way I could let it disappear entirely without documenting it. Maybe the pics will help me accept it, kiss it, and release it. I tend to fixate on places that I remember from my childhood and will always remember the Beekman. I could hardly believe it when I read in the news that it was going to close. I still wonder and worry about what cinema treasure will be next to go. :–(
GREAT JOB documenting Sloan Kettering’s demolition of the Beekman!
Sloan Kettering should have listened to the community and found a way to build their cancer center and preserve this great theatre.
Your photos need to be posted on the first page of Cinema Treasures.
Thanks for being there with your camera.
Miscellaneous Beekman demolition images: Sorry for the odd blurred lobby images, I took the pics through a black mesh fence. If you look closely, in the upper right of the lobby pics, the debris-strewn raked floor of the balcony is visible. In a couple of the images the star motif on the lobby floor can still be seen, though obscured by dust.
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
gustavelifting i understand your point, but i spent many happy hours working there, it just won’t be the same when i go past the site. but yes at least there is a part of the beekman that remains and i thank you for your point
Guys, I was never to the Beekman, but we should be thankful the sign was saved. Many theaters leave without a trace of being there.
as always dave you hit the nail on the head
………so they are really dismembering him – I hope they at least gave the old Beek a good stiff drink or some other anesthesia -
Sloan-Kettering SUCKS!
ThankYou Again davebazooka, sadly now there are just wonderful memories of the beekman
Beekman demolition, December 26, 2005:
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
After the roadshow it moved here
View link
The RKO Fantasy is listed here: /theaters/4041/
Interesting, I wonder what the RKO Fantasy in Nassau was, I couldn’t find that theatre in a site search
I don’t recall the Beekman running 70mm films like this.
View link
edsolero many of us feel the same way you do, i have managed both theaters, and although i did like them both, trust me the beekman was pure class, imiss it very much. As a matter of fact it was my first theater after i left Radio City Music Hall
I think I saw “Frances” here in 1982 or so. This was the bio-pic starring Jessica Lange as troubled 1930’s film actress Frances Farmer. I’d been here more than once, but “Frances” is all that specifically leaps to mind. Nothing I can really add to the conversation here. What a shame. The subterranean New York Twin across the street is a dreary and unworthy successor to the “Beekman” name. I think I’d rather have that moniker retired than have its memory besmirched by association with the Twin.
I was in the neighborhood yesterday for a christmas party at my brother’s fire house on 67th Street between 3rd and Lex. I was surprised to see the New York Twin sign with the name “Beekman” which is what prompted me to post my 2 cents here.
You’re very welcome! :–)
thanks davebazooka great shots
I wonder why they left the other sign up there?
A snowy December Beekman:
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
View link
the other day i heard that a theater owner on long island paid $10.000 dollars for the Beekman Sign, and he is going to refurbish it and place on display in his theater, when i get more info i’ll pass it on
So the quest to treat cancer strikes again as the big excuse why things people clearly love must be gotten rid of. And to the point in some cases that the Constitution of the United States is getting cast aside and fully trashed in the process. So in New York City it’s the Beekman Theatre that got targeted. And here in Philadelphia, PA, where I reside, for the past year and a half the Fox Chase Cancer Center has been trying its damndest to bring down historic and much loved Burholme Park just adjacent to it in its claim that it must expand and can only do so at its current location. Which, of course, is a total crock. So going by how cancer treatment was successfully used to bring down the Beekman, I’d say we’re seeing a most definite pattern going on here. Alas, I only wish I had learned about the Beekman Theatre sooner, so that I could’ve joined you all in the campaign to help save it.
I’m currently involved in a struggle to restore an historic theater here in Philly, and if the effort ever does prove successful, I’m seeing all kinds of things in the Beekman Theatre’s design that could be incorporated into this theater here, and that I feel this theater’s designer, William Harold Lee, would’ve fully approved of. For the design of the Beekman was brilliant, it truly was! Every aspect of it screamed class, and what the heck is wrong with a little class I ask!?
Sloan-Kettering doesn’t need to make the site pay – I believe they are a non-profit organization, and have various endowments and foundations that maintain their operations.
According to the Greenport’s page on this site, the lobby there has been re-done with a nostalgia or memorobilia theme. I will give Clearview the benefit of the doubt, and say they probably wanted to put those signs on the Twin but the landlord prevented it. When they signed the lease they didn’t realize that the landlord was a psycho – they’ve been there six months now, and are propbably starting to come to that realization.
Why is the Beekman logo going to be placed in a distant LI theatre instead of right across the street at the new Beekman? That makes no sense.
I don’t see how Sloan-Kettering is going to be able to make that site pay with only a breast cancer clinic. They must be going to include a skinny luxury tower above the clinic from which they can collect massively high rent. Re the Beekman logos on the old building, I would think they belonged to Sloan Ketering and not Clearview, so the hospital folks get to sell the logos for high prices too! Bummer. Is the Greenport a Clearview theatre?