MacArthur Theater

4859 MacArthur Boulevard NW,
Washington, DC 20007

Unfavorite 15 people favorited this theater

Showing 51 - 75 of 100 comments

atmos
atmos on June 7, 2010 at 2:47 pm

This theatre is listed in the 1945 Theatre Catalog as currently being built by John and Drew Eberson.

sguttag
sguttag on February 14, 2010 at 11:32 am

For Star Trek II…it was 70mm 6-track Dolby Stereo on ALL presentations…no the noise reduction would not have been on on some shows, off on others.

As to the processor…as a single, it was a K-B Theatre…as a Triple, it was a Circle theatre (and then Cineplex after Circle sold the chain).

Strictly due to the fact that the Dolby CP200 was THE 70mm processor of the industry from 1980 until its discontinuation in about 1994 (which is about when 70mm died out in favor of digital audio)…yes under Circle, there was a CP200 used in the large theatre (with CP50s in the two smaller theatres).

Steve

JodarMovieFan
JodarMovieFan on February 13, 2010 at 5:00 pm

Jogging my memories of Star Trek II at the MacArthur, were/are there times you could turn OFF the Dolby or noise suppression system that was in place (if there was one)? I’ve seen the movie many times here during its run and remember some presentations were louder than others. When I say ‘louder,’ I mean you could hear soundtrack noise such as whistles, crackling and pop. Others when the presentation was quieter, it seemed something was missing. Personally, I enjoyed the 6-track presentation with ALL the noise because it seemed to be more engaging to me.

When it was triplexed and Dark Crystal opened, did they keep the Dolby CP200 for the main, or was it replaced and/or other systems added for the two smaller auditoriums?

sguttag
sguttag on February 13, 2010 at 1:52 pm

Mark is correct. It was a Dolby Stereo print but it was played on an Eprad Stereo processor. The MacArthur’s house sound system was a Simplex XL…capable of up to 6-channel sound. However, for Star Trek, the Eprad was installed (Eprad was a competitor to Dolby in those days). The Eprad processor stayed their permanently until 1982, when a Dolby CP200 was installed for Star Trek II. The MacA closed later that year however.

SG

Mark_L
Mark_L on January 18, 2010 at 3:02 pm

I’ll try to clarify what Steve said. According to Steve from above, who is an expert cinema technician/engineer, the STAR TREK premiere was shown in stereo, but using an Eprad processor instead of one from Dolby. To be advertised in Dolby Stereo, you have to use a Dolby unit.

The screening was in 35mm, not 70mm. There was not time to make 70mm prints in time for the opening. I read (I believe in an issue of American Cinematographer) that Robert Wise personally carried one reel to the premiere as they had just finished putting on the final touches.

JodarMovieFan
JodarMovieFan on January 18, 2010 at 1:20 pm

In layman’s terms there was NO stereo with the first Star Trek movie or a different kind of stereo system? If there was 70mm played there as many posters have listed, are we to assume that there was at least a 4-track stereo set up there? 6-track?

sguttag
sguttag on January 18, 2010 at 4:38 am

A point of fact, the World Premiere of Star Trek: The Motion Picture played in 35mm on an EPRAD Starscope, not in “Dolby Stereo.” Anyone that tells you otherwise is mistaken. In fact, the MacArthur didn’t receive a Dolby processor until 1982 for Star Trek II. Star Trek II did play in 70mm.

Steve

WilliamSpainhour
WilliamSpainhour on January 15, 2010 at 9:17 pm

I managed this house in the early Seventies, during the 70 MM reissue of The Sound Of Music. The picture/sound facilities were great at that time. It was the only “palace” I ever ran. I’m glad I was with KB when things were still top drawer.

Local619
Local619 on November 24, 2009 at 2:23 am

The world premier of Star Trek, at the MacArthur.. per Gary Arnold of the Washington Post was December 6, 1979.. Gary Arnold states in the Dec 6 Post “Hundreds, maybe even thousands, of Trekkies are supposedly converging on Washington to surround tonight’s world premiere of "Star Trek: The Motion Picture” at the K-B MacArthur with hopeful vibrations. Producer Gene Roddenberry, director Robert Wise and all the principal cast members, including William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy, are expected to attend the 7 p.m. showing, an invitational benefit for the scholarship and youth education fund of the National Space Club. A black-tie reception will follow at the National Air and Space Museum."

JodarMovieFan
JodarMovieFan on November 24, 2009 at 1:11 am

Can’t believe its been 30 years. I was too young to go into downtown but thoroughly enjoyed a sold out opening presentation in Langley Park, MD’s KB Langley. What an event film it was for the time, but I don’t think the movie had 70mm engagements in the DC area since the film was so rushed into theaters. I don’t think they had time to make 70mm prints in order to meet the Dec. 7 release.

raysson
raysson on November 24, 2009 at 12:01 am

The original STAR TREK:THE MOTION PICTURE had its World North American Premiere at the MacArthur Theatre. The film was shown in 70mm-6 Track Dobly Stereo. The premiere of this movie was in November before everyone else got to check it out nationally on December 7, 1979.

Other Premiere Enagements were in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago and Boston.

sstrack
sstrack on August 4, 2008 at 10:55 pm

What a conversation – I worked at the MacArthur in the early 60s. A high school friend of mine, Buddy Kearny, worked for KB and told me they need ushers. I think it was the summer of 1960. I started out working the parking lot across the alley next to the the theater. This consisted of laying on the hood of a parked car most of the evening watching the planes come down the river on the Georgetown approach on the way to National. Eventually the manager, Bill Flanagan and later Ron Pitcherello(sp), allowed me to work the lounge upstairs. Butter cookies and coffee for the folks waiting for the next show – usually a British comedy. They all played there – old and new it seems. And they were great. My favorites may be the St. Trinian’s series with Alistair Sim.

After a few months (I think), I was transferred to the Apex where Flanagan had gone for a stint. I was lucky to be there for a couple of years where I worked for Bill Hunter – just a wonderful guy – Bruce Burns, Ritch Hutchinson and many others including Marvin Goldman’s son, Ron (but thats another story).

By the way, I don’t remember there being popcorn at the MacArthur but it did make its way back to the Apex and the Baronet. My understanding of the “no popcorn” policy was that the salt ruined the carpeting and management didn’t want that to happen. A guy named Jim Sheetz took over the concession end of things for KB and must have convinced Mr. Burka that you could buy a lot of carpet with the profits from popcorn.

rlvjr
rlvjr on July 20, 2008 at 5:32 am

ALMOST ALL of the above comments miss the true legacy of the MacArthur Theater. When this theater was opened by KB in 1946, it was an immediate box office flop. They were playing the same “first neighborhood run” movies as everybody else and this was a sleepy neighborhood of stay-at-home’s watching their 8" Motorola TV’s. KB resorted to double features but without great success. Then Fred Burka and Marvin Goldman got the bright idea to have Exclusive First Runs from the British, France, Sweden, etc. The admission prices were midway between “neighborhood” and “first run downtown”.

The success was staggering. Some pictures which played dozens of weeks were A QUEEN IS CROWNED (the color documentary), THE MOUSE THAT ROARED, MURDER SHE SAID, the golden age of British comedy with films of Peter Sellers, Terry-Thomas, others. The theater was filled the night we saw Ingmar Bergman’s WILD STRAWBERRIES (the Best Movie Ever Made — sez me). This success continued for years, and KB also extended this success to the APEX in upper Northwest. BUT… but…

The supply of outstanding British and foreign films dwindled. Of course we miss the MacArthur, it’s shimmering heyday, but we also miss having quality intelligent movies to see. Behold 2008: Nothing but trash comic book nonsense. 2009 will be even worse.

JackCoursey
JackCoursey on June 17, 2008 at 3:27 am

Here are June 2008 photos of the former MacArthur Theatre. Note: the interior has been completely gutted. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

sguttag
sguttag on June 9, 2008 at 3:30 am

I want to say the little theatres used Kintek surrounds though they may have been Altec 312s. The main auditorium used Altec 312s and yes they were suspended via cables. The little theatres had the surrounds affixed to the side walls.

As for the booth…it was cut up. There were two booths after the split. That is the only way you could have the middle balcony. So theatres 2 and 3 shared one booth and theatre #1 had its own booth.

The screen was not enlarged.

Steve

JodarMovieFan
JodarMovieFan on June 9, 2008 at 12:59 am

Steve!

Your last comments are like the revelation of the wizard behind the curtain! :P I enjoyed the little theaters and the balconies. They were, to me, like private screening rooms. No, I wouldn’t want to watch “Lawrence of Arabia” or “2001” there but for the films I did see there they were memorable enough.

Just exactly what kind of minimalist surrounds did they have in the smaller ones? I thought they had suspended speakers going around the entire auditorium?

After the carve up, did they expand the original projection area for the two little screening rooms? Or were separate ones built where you had to run from one to the other for each show?

As for the screen size, I could have sworn that on grand re-opening day, with the opening of Jim Hensen’s “The Dark Crystal,” which I saw there with my friends in 70mm opening weekend, that the Weekend ad made mention of a new, larger screen.

sguttag
sguttag on June 8, 2008 at 5:23 pm

While it was true there were “Dolby” sound systems in all three theatres. The little two were about as minimalist as you could go…three whole surrounds…two on one wall and one on the other!

The main theatre did have a decent enough system for its day though it was a bit of a hodge-podge (A4s without wings and such).

The stage in the main theatre remained unchnaged and thus the screen size remained the same too.

For me, the MacA lost much though certainly not all of its charm when it was cut up.

Steve

JodarMovieFan
JodarMovieFan on January 15, 2008 at 10:43 pm

I’d have to disagree with you about the MacArthur losing its charm after it was triplexed. Granted, its nice to be in a nice large auditorium and take in the sight and sounds of the environment BUT, I think the theater gained some in that the two smaller auditoriums did not detract a whole lot from the original. In fact, you can recall, they opened up the upper level to balconies and had decent Dolby systems and I believe the screen was replaced in the big auditorium, with a larger one. And the smaller auditoriums had curtains that rose and fell during their respective shows (at least the times that I saw movies in them, which wasn’t a lot..I probably can recall three showings.. Flashdance, Eleni and Heaven Help Us) and it was a vertical rise and drop at that.

In any case, with three screens, you should be able to balance some decent programming between the first run and classics. As nice as the Landmarks are, they aren’t that much different to me than your usual multiplexes.

Giles
Giles on January 15, 2008 at 9:12 pm

“Dupont closed because the downtown Landmark (E Street) shows the arthouse films.”

you can make that broad overall comment but that’s not always the case. They pick and choose their films carefully and in one case promised a film ‘Brand Upon the Brain!’ and then cancelled it’s engagement for no apparent reason. Bethesda’s films rotate so infrequently it’s a joke. Dupont had the occasional indie film that Landmark never showed, so it’s going to be interesting if and how Landmark will show more films on a weekly basis. Perusing other cities and those films that don’t have DC engagements is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the many indie/foreign films that will now, never get seen on a theatre screen – many Washingtonians will have to try to see more films at their one off museum showings (at the generally terrible mid-afternoon weekend showings) or just wait for the eventual home video release.

I think once the MacArthur was split into three theatres, it somewhat lost it’s charm, mind you it was good for the turn around and more shows, the size was obviousily diminished. It’s water under the bridge at this point, but having seen how the Avalon Theatre Project was created to saving the Avalon, the Palisades community had wished they had been more vocal and supportive of keeping the MacArthur alive, even when Cineplex Loews eventually closed it.

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on January 15, 2008 at 8:36 pm

Dupont closed because the downtown Landmark (E Street) shows the arthouse films.

The MacArthur had a big screen, but the Avalon is a more ornate, historic theater. It was a shame, of course, that the MacArthur closed. I’m thrilled the Avalon reopened.

People who liked the MacArthur should make sure to buy tickets at the remaining historic theaters in the area, Avalon, Uptown, AFI Silver, the Baltimore Senator and others. Same architect, John Zink, designed the Uptown and Baltimore Senator.

JodarMovieFan
JodarMovieFan on January 15, 2008 at 8:28 pm

With the Dupont Circle 5 closing, maybe this venue could be viable once again. The other night, there was local news coverage of the closing and it was stated that there are more screens in the city than ever! I suppose they’re factoring in the large multiplexes at Gallery Place and Georgetown. But those venues are on the other side of town and I’d hardly consider them treasures by any stretch of the imagination. If the Avalon can be brought back and made a success, the MacArthur can, too, with the right support. To be honest, the MacArthur is more of a treasure than the Avalon is and, of course, holds more favorable memories. There was talk about turning the place into office space, maybe they could partially do that to make the theaters more of an economical viability. I’d think they could clear up the empty space at the top of the building and back.

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on January 15, 2008 at 4:33 am

JodarMovieFan, they are nice photos, but I will clarify that I didn’t take them myself. I haven’t revisited since it was showing movies. CVS may have a lease that gives them an option to renew.

JodarMovieFan
JodarMovieFan on January 15, 2008 at 4:26 am

Nice pictures, Howard! So..maybe after CVS lease runs out the theater will return? It seems as if it would be an easy conversion since the CVS shopping floor takes up only a small part of the theater..probably just the lobby area.

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on January 15, 2008 at 4:19 am

2008 exterior photos, last of which looks somewhat inside.
As a CVS.
View link
View link
View link

sguttag
sguttag on July 23, 2007 at 2:26 am

The Fairfax Square was like the Cinema in that it is underground…but unlike the Cinema…its entrance didn’t face the street but faced a parking garage and was 180 degrees from the street.

The Fine Arts…while I can’t speak to it before 1980…after 1980 it had no curtain and there were no indication one had ever existed. The shadow box went all of the way to the exit doors by the screen (that had alarms on them if you used them) so there was no place to stack the curtain. It would have been really odd to have a crtain that far in front of the screen (over 3 feet in front).