Cinerama Hollywood
6360 Sunset Boulevard,
Los Angeles,
CA
90028
6360 Sunset Boulevard,
Los Angeles,
CA
90028
143 people
favorited this theater
Showing 876 - 900 of 1,421 comments
If the Dome does not run reel-to-reel anymore, it’s highly unlikely that we will see a high quality, pristine 70 mm print. It’s a shame, considering the number of 70 mm titles that have been restored in recent years. So it looks like the only viable options under those conditions for South Pacific are 35 mm (on a platter, assuming that a screenable 35 mm print exists) or digital. And with those choices, my guess is that they will opt for digital.
JSA
Is it for sure digital on South Pacific? I have no reason to see it if it is, but I’d love to see the 70mm print – and why would they show digital if they have the 70mm print.
Any word on “This Is Cinerama” popping up again? I’ve never seen it, believe it or not.
I’ve heard digital on “South Pacific.” Also, “2001” 70mm again and…..Cinerama: “How The West Was Won.”
A step in the right direction. No word on format. Although I don’t count SP as one of my favorites, the recent 70 mm DTS print is good. I wonder if they have re-installed the equipment for reel-to-reel.
Or, could this be a digital presentation?
JSA
They’re showing “South Pacific” on 8/19. In the Dome. And it’s not an AFI sponsored event. Rizzo, are y'all finally taking our advice?
http://tinyurl.com/58xgp4
Whoever tweaked the sound in theater 10 upstairs deserves a raise. The bass sounded deep and powerful for The Dark Knight.
The Arclight and the Dome sound like cool movie theatres—perfect for some of those great old classic films, too. Sure wish we had something like that here in the Boston area, although we do have IMAX. Not sure if it’s the same, though. Regarding the question I was going to ask about films such as West Side Story being shown in such a theatre (or theatres), that’s been answered already. Wish it would come here again, and that we had a big theatre like that that ran older classic films.
Roland’s site is a good site for Cinerama and D-150 info and plus the films too.
Roland should be very proud of his Cinerama site – it’s the best one out there and all the Cinerama fans know it well!
Not only do great minds think alike – they apparently all know where the Cinerama information is on the net and appear to make comments right around the same time!
Atlanta had at least one other Cinerama house, listed on CT as the Georgia Twin:
/theaters/11568/
Also, this site has fairly comprehensive listing of Cinerama theaers world-wide which shows a number of other Cinerama houses in the southern states:
View link
You can find the Cinerama locations here.
View link
Here’s a list of all Cinerama theaters in the USA and around the world, courtesy of Roland Lataille’s excellent Cinerama website:
View link
Didn’t they have Cinerama Theatres in the South?
I read somewhere that one Atlanta theatre had that Cinerama process.
I been to the one that was in Los Angeles/Hollywood years ago back in 1977 when they screened “Star Wars"
in 70mm-6 track Dobly Stereo.
Nice decoration…TERRIBLE MOVIE!
that in70mm.com list is incomplete, they’ve shown some 70 prints recently at the Aero theatre, a stunning new print of “Star”, which had the best colors and clarity i’ve ever seen in my life. But really there are only a small handful of 70 prints out there in circulation, and these L.A. theatres keep showing the same 3 or 4 films over and over. Why does Oslo, Norway keep getting all the cool stuff?
I’ve heard that it’s either going to be “How the West Was Won” or “It’s a Mad,… World”. Check towards the bottom of this link:
View link
There are new 70 mm prints of “Grand Prix” and “Khartoum”, two single-lens Cinerama productions that had Dome engagements in the 60’s. In addition there’s a new 70 mm/DTS “West Side Story” print. Any of those would look spectacular in that screen.
JSA
Getting back on topic, has anyone heard of any Cinerama/70MM plans at The Dome to offset the September/October dry season at the movies?
The proscenium at the Chinese was not removed until Cinemiracle was installed for Windjammer. Two support columns had to be removed one to the right and the other to the left of where the stage once was and a shearing wall was installed. Those columns are visible in early pictures and in the movie Singing In the Rain. The ceiling dropped several inches when the supports were removed. The original CinemaScope picture was not very large as it was limited by the width of the stage. For the Cinemamiracle installation a 120 foot screen holder was constructed and the projection booth was moved to the lower level in the back of the auditorium because Cinemiracle required a zero degree projection angle. There was a brass plaque in the forecourt dating the Cinemiracle installation. The Cinemiracle booth has since been removed and the projection booth was rebuilt in its original location. This was done during the last major restoration. The organ was also removed at some point probably during the Cinemamiracle retrofit but I’m not sure when the organ was removed. The organ music used to come from the main chandelier as it was ducted to come from there.
:)
thanks for the corrections Roger.
So the proscenium at the Chinese wasn’t removed until Windjammer? I thought it would’ve been done for the The Robe in 1953.
It is obvious that segask does not know his history as he stated “yeah. In order to properly convert his famous movie palaces to widescreen Sid Grauman ripped out the prosceniums at his Egyptian and Chinese theaters in Hollywood.” Sid Grauman died in 1950 before the advent of widescreen! The proscenium was not taken out of the Chinese until the installation of Cinemiracle for Windjammer in the late 50’s early 60’s. The Egyptian was modified for D-150 again well after the start of widescreen and long after Sid’s death. Another fact is that Sid Grauman never owned the Chinese outright and lost everything in the stock market crash of ‘29.
Masking the bottom of the screen and bringing in the side masking would be a big improvement. The smiley effect would be minimized, the cross reflections would be reduced, and the cropping of the bottom of the frame would be gone.
Recently saw Indy 4 at the Seattle Cinerama. The flatter screen with a milder curve was still huge and impressive. Even seemed larger than the pre-remodel screen when I used to see 70mm there. I have not seen 3-Strip at the Seattle Cinerama , only the Dome. I am also sure what the screen they use for 70mm in Seattle. The masking seemed opened all the way to the ceiling, so with more height available I am guessing slightly less width for 2.2:1.
So, under J.Randell’s proposal, perhaps bringing in the wings to roughly 75-80 feet wide would do the trick. It could work. You’d still have the opulence of a ginormous screen minus the distortion issues that have the purists amongst us crying FOUL.
Rizzo, y'all willing to give this a try?