AMC Lincoln Square 13

1998 Broadway,
New York, NY 10023

Unfavorite 78 people favorited this theater

Showing 101 - 125 of 1,707 comments

moviebuff82
moviebuff82 on January 20, 2020 at 1:48 pm

I hope soon they replace the seats in the old screens with new ones.

ridethectrain
ridethectrain on January 20, 2020 at 1:46 pm

yes balcony still there, photos is in the photos section 70MM is theatre 2 Kings if AMC still has the projectors

xbs2034
xbs2034 on January 20, 2020 at 7:00 am

The Dolby Cinema still has a balcony. I imagine they had to get rid of 70mm capability in that screen because of Dolby putting in their laser projectors, but I saw Murder on the Orient Express and Phantom Thread in 70mm in a different screen (I think screen 5) so hopefully that screen still has the capability

Al Alvarez
Al Alvarez on January 19, 2020 at 10:11 pm

“Lossless” sounds like the same old THX fraud. “If the theatre didn’t pay to keep the noise out, we did our job.”

Antoine Doinel
Antoine Doinel on January 19, 2020 at 10:01 pm

P.S. did they get rid of the balcony too? If they did, what utter shits. Actually, that whole complex has become kind of a run down dump. But they wasted $$$$$$$ to install a “Dolby Cinema” while the rest of the place falls apart, and is dirty and run down looking.

Antoine Doinel
Antoine Doinel on January 19, 2020 at 9:57 pm

There is no such thing as “lossless” digital sound. Digital is lossless by nature. It’s an inherent trait. They can call it “lossless” all they want, that will never make it true.

Having said that:

Does anyone know if House #1, the “Lowes”, still has the capability to project 70mm film? Or has that been lost since they converted it at greatand wasteful expense to the pointless gimmick of a “Dolby Cinema” theatre. Yay. Giant projection screen television.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 on December 16, 2019 at 6:11 pm

Hello-

has anyone who frequents this theater been to the Regal Union Square recently? a number of the auditoriums have new seats which are uncomfortable if you’re a taller than average. plus the color is hedious. they look like a pumpkin threw up. a color blind person would have picked a better dolor.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 on November 19, 2019 at 4:26 pm

Hello-

I am apparently one of the very few people who liked Justice League(which i saw at this theater) as released. to which a question i hope someone can answer as best they can. talk about the much asked for Snyder Cut and been much in the mews lately which prompts the question. at the beginning of 2017 when it was announced Snyder would be leaving the film because of his daughter’s tragic death. so it’s my thought that if he didn’t finish shooting the film how can there be a Snyder Cut?

ridethectrain
ridethectrain on November 8, 2019 at 2:11 am

Please update in description, the Loews theatre became Dolby Cinema at AMC and now seats only 291 people.

CF100
CF100 on October 26, 2019 at 8:47 pm

ridethectrain:

their some theatres that use Atmos in premium theatres, but it very few

Sorry, not quite sure what you mean…?

ridethectrain
ridethectrain on October 26, 2019 at 3:26 pm

That not true, the AMC Universal in Hollywood is the only complex that has Dolby Atmos in all screens and their some theatres that use Atmos in premium theatres, but it very few

CF100
CF100 on October 25, 2019 at 9:55 am

Whether “Atmouse” or not, i.e. the extent to which the extended capabilities of Atmos are used, see the Dolby Atmos Specifications document, which sets out the minimum system requirements and design.

Even if overheads are disused, there is still the option of using objects for directional surround, rather than the traditional use of the surrounds (IMAX excepted)—replicating the same channel over multiple surround speakers (producing a diffuse effect—desirable in the days of Dolby Stereo with mono surround only, and still can be for “ambience.”)

Additionally, the surrounds are “bass managed” with subwoofers thus providing an extended bass response. As I mentioned on the respective Cinema Treasures page, this was obvious during my last visit to the Odeon Leicester Square.

Given also that Dolby Atmos installations to date have tended to be in “premium” auditoria, entering a screen that has a Dolby Atmos-capable system should be an indication that, even for 5.1 or 7.1 content, the sound system will be of above average quality.

On the other hand, it is too bad that the Dolby Cinema trailer demonstration of Atmos is very impressive, whilst IME that “3D” soundstage is rarely heard in the main feature.

I am pleased to say that I have never seen a rodent in a Dolby Atmos-equipped cinema!

moviebuff82
moviebuff82 on October 23, 2019 at 5:08 pm

Dolby atmos has become atmouse.

CF100
CF100 on October 23, 2019 at 5:05 pm

Al Alvarez:

Sony Dynamic Digital Sound, a little known industry gimmick also know in the industry as “Still Doesn’t Do Shit”. SDDS.

Eh?

CF100
CF100 on October 23, 2019 at 5:05 pm

ridethectrain:

Since laser came out, AMC doesn’t like to maintain the Dolby glasses that are needed for both IMAX and Dolby CInema.

If true, then that is pathetic! The glasses are more expensive than the polarised (RealD, etc.) 3D types but “maintaining” them involves putting them in a “dishwasher” (and I can’t imagine that attrition due to non-returns amounts to a significant cost?)

I don’t know if some of the former Loews theatres, if AMC replaced the SDDS processors with Dolby Digital.

Dolby Digital and SDDS were sound formats for 35mm film prints:

Photo of 35mm film showing DTS timecode, Dolby Digital and SDDS data and analogue optical tracks.

(DTS stored the audio on external CD-ROMs synchronized to the image, Dolby Digital and SDDS stored the data on the film itself.)

They were both “lossy” formats (like MP3); SDDS had the benefit of supporting up to 5 screen channels instead of 3, albeit in practice the number of titles and venues that supported this was probably limited.

Suffice it to say that comparing the systems beyond this is now academic; however, the SDDS decoders were quite advanced for the time, with on-board digital equalisation for system tuning.

Also, there was a “war” between DTS, Dolby Digital and Sony over reliability, with Dolby claiming that storing the data between sprockets instead of the film edges meant that their system could cope with more wear and tear.


In today’s age of digital theatrical distribution, all audio is lossless digital per industry standards; whether or not there’s a Dolby box around or not is irrelevant—except in the case of Dolby Atmos.

Therefore, for a regular 5.1 or 7.1 system, differences are to do with the equipment specified, room acoustics and quality of the installation.

Al Alvarez
Al Alvarez on October 22, 2019 at 10:10 pm

Sony Dynamic Digital Sound, a little known industry gimmick also know in the industry as “Still Doesn’t Do Shit”. SDDS.

ridethectrain
ridethectrain on October 22, 2019 at 9:17 pm

Most theatres cut down the 3D shows to bare minimum or limited shows. Since laser came out, AMC doesn’t like to maintain the Dolby glasses that are needed for both IMAX and Dolby CInema.

Disney has cut down on that most IMAX films are standard 2D. I like to see 3D, but it very difficult to see. I’m not seeing 3D films on small screens or non Dolby 5.1 or 7.1 screens. I don’t know if some of the former Loews theatres, if AMC replaced the SDDS processors with Dolby Digital.

When I saw a few films in the AMC Empire small houses, it didn’t sound like Dolby Digital. At least when I saw Once Upon A Time in Hollywood in theatre 7 Paradise, I was surprised it sounded like it was Dolby DIgital for the film.

AMC and the former Loews Theatres, the primary sound in the 1990s and the start of the new millenium, the sound of choice was Sony Dynamic Digital Sound.

bigjoe59
bigjoe59 on October 22, 2019 at 2:58 pm

Hello-

I really liked The Last Jedi and simply don’t get the hate for the film. so can someone in an intelligent adult manner describe to me what was soooooooo wrong with the film. I look at this way- if it was sooooo uneven why did it make two truckloads of $$$.

moviebuff82
moviebuff82 on October 22, 2019 at 2:44 pm

it seems that 3d is not as popular as it once was…star wars wasn’t shot in 3d but shot in 70mm imax and 35mm along with digital shots..check out the imdb specs…this was the same way with episode 7 but episode 8 didn’t have an imax ratio as the imax version was only scope.

ridethectrain
ridethectrain on October 21, 2019 at 10:39 pm

Star Wars is meant to be seen in IMAX laser 3D. I Don’t understand why 3D shows are very limited

celboy
celboy on October 21, 2019 at 10:02 pm

the usher told me a company purchased the entire 6pm dolby screening of star wars—-bummed about that—I was 10th on line at the theatre.

moviebuff82
moviebuff82 on October 21, 2019 at 2:41 pm

I wonder if Lincoln Square will show episode 9 in 70mm imax or just laser imax alongside the Dolby, 3d, and regular versions in the 20 some year old rocker seats once tickets go on sale after the worldwide debut of the final trailer for what will most likely be the endgame of star wars movies…

CF100
CF100 on October 20, 2019 at 10:43 am

bigjoe59:

what was the point of Ang Lee shooting the film the way he did if no theater can in fact show it that way?

Shooting at higher than the target fps can result in better output, basically “temporal oversampling.”

At 24fps, it’s essential to have some motion blur on fast action, otherwise “strobing” is perceived.

For “Gemini Man,” RealD TrueMotion software was used for the down conversion to lower frame rates. It provides a “virtual shutter,” allowing for different options in post-production, even varying by regions within a frame.

American Cinematographer – “RealD’s TrueMotion for Multiple Frame Rate Options”.

There are some video demonstrations on the linked page, including one showing what it can do with the old “reversed wheel rotation” problem, blurring the spokes of the wheels whilst reducing blur that would otherwise have occurred on background objects.

markp
markp on October 14, 2019 at 7:53 pm

bigjoe59, again I will repeat. The pencil pushers of today care about the bottom line. As I said previously, this is nothing new. I dealt with this in the late 70s. It all about the money.