RKO Keith's Theatre

135-35 Northern Boulevard,
Flushing, NY 11354

Unfavorite 45 people favorited this theater

Showing 301 - 325 of 1,379 comments

BobbyS
BobbyS on April 4, 2011 at 2:08 am

Another shell game or did they call it pea game in its day when people would set up stands near theaters maybe RKO Keith’s and try to wow the public and their pocket books while thousands were in line to buy a ticket for a movie/stage show.. Nothing is really new. The shell games get bigger, and the egos of some even bigger!

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on April 4, 2011 at 12:01 am

Thank you Layla & BobyS. Looks like the census results aren’t supporting the picture of unbridled and continuous growth that the BP and developers would have you believe.

BobbyS
BobbyS on April 3, 2011 at 1:56 am

SWC, you are the greatest. Also love your photography….

layla2barb
layla2barb on April 2, 2011 at 5:32 pm

Referring to the March 2011 post of the pic of crates, I wonder if they could still be in the building since the theater unlocked. So Sad. Love your photography SWC. Layla

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on March 28, 2011 at 3:21 pm

That’s the Parks Dept.,a different ball of wax, with the BP getting their name on a plaque. Shulman acts more like a BP than the current one in her position as president and chief executive officer of the “LDC” (local development corp.) that spawned the “TOD” (transit oriented development). The LDC: “Flushing is experiencing an enormous amount of growth in an exceedingly concentrated area that not only strains the existing mass transportation infrastructure". Their solution: build three 13-story buildings and a two-level parking garage at the LIRR station. So it makes perfect sense to build 357 units at the RKO.

RobertR
RobertR on March 28, 2011 at 2:11 pm

“The last BP who had any real power was Donald Manes”.

His protégé the equally crooked Claire Shulman sneakily has the 1939 Worlds Fair Amphitheatre torn down saying it was “dangerous”. The building was all brick and would have stood for 1000 more years. There were developers interested in producing shows there but many of the same people who kept shows out of the Forest Hills Tennis Stadium did not want shows done at Flushing Meadows. Ms Schulman is also directly responsible for the condition of the NYS Pavilion next to the Queens Theatre. She has been quoted as saying “we don’t need another museum in MY Park”.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on March 28, 2011 at 10:38 am

I know that you are quite right, William, but email cost nothing. And if it serves no greater purpose than to get the sentiments off my chest, that’ll just have to do.

WilliamMcQuade
WilliamMcQuade on March 28, 2011 at 10:27 am

Do not waste the postage . She could care less. I thought only the GOP were heartless. Manes could have taught classes in meaness .We had 8000 signatures on petitions for the Triboro & it meant nothing. All that mattered to him was money. All the money in the world could not help him.

It will be laugable what is ultimately saved. Naturally the politicians will pat themselves on the back on the great job they did & they will be beaming with civic pride.I make it a habit never to listen to a politician on a full stomach.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on March 28, 2011 at 10:07 am

The only thing undulating at this point is my stomach! Just posted this response to the article:

“ Why is it that every journalist and political leader accepts the developer’s promises to restore and preserve the "landmarked lobby” of the Keith’s when it is obvious that the interior wall on the souther end of the lobby (where much of the gorgeous architectural detail is still in great shape) will have to be removed so that the rest of the lobby will be visible from the street through the proposed glass wall on Northern Blvd?

How do you display the inside of an egg if you don’t crack it open and remove much of the shell? If the entire lobby is landmarked and to be restored, protected and preserved, how can this be allowed? It’s bad enough the once magnificent auditorium has been allowed to decay past the point of consideration for a truly complete restoration of the entire theater, but are we now to comprimise even on the small part of building that actually IS protected by landmark designation? In some dark corner of Hell, Donald Manes is laughing manically. "

I plan on forwarding these sentiments to Helen Marshall, as well.

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on March 27, 2011 at 12:56 am

I guess it won’t be long before this huge Carnival cruise ship will be parked at the end of Main Street, towering over the undulating green waves covering the ruins of the Titanic, and the Helen Marshall Senior Bathroom Flushing Pavilion ready for its first customers.

They should line the sidewalk in front of it with flagpoles flying blowups of $1000 bills and call it Payoff Plaza.

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on March 26, 2011 at 11:27 pm

The BP nowadays is a ceremonial position with little power and a small budget, but enough to spend $103,000 on office furniture in 2008. In 1989 (5 years after they de-landmarked the RKO) the Board of Estimate was declared unconstitutional the following year it was abolished and the Borough President’s power reduced to only making recommendations – (to 3 term). The last BP who had any real power was Donald Manes.

BobbyS
BobbyS on March 26, 2011 at 10:28 am

Remember the ole saying “Money Talks” !!!!!!!!!!!!

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on March 26, 2011 at 10:19 am

She’s on a “give the developer what they want” roll, approving up-zoning in residential Whitestone yesterday.

WilliamMcQuade
WilliamMcQuade on March 25, 2011 at 6:04 pm

Whoopee doo

Her 2 predecessors brought it to the sorry state it is today. Does she want a medal?

Tinseltoes
Tinseltoes on March 25, 2011 at 4:46 pm

Queens Borough Preident Helen Marshall has given her blessings to the RKO Keith’s Flushing re-development plan: View link

gd14lawn
gd14lawn on March 16, 2011 at 5:51 pm

This weekend I attended two of the five performances by Furthur at the Best Buy Theatre. The Keith’s in Flushing would have been a much better venue if it were available. It would have seated more people and parking would have been a breeze compared to parking in Times Square. It also would have been more comfortable than the Best Buy could ever hope to be. The people that attended these shows went despite them being in Times Square, not because of it.

WilliamMcQuade
WilliamMcQuade on March 15, 2011 at 8:27 pm

Aspires is being kind.

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on March 15, 2011 at 11:30 am

Exactly, the community could have a landmark building in a better location instead of a second rate imitation. The similarity is only in the style it aspires to.

WilliamMcQuade
WilliamMcQuade on March 15, 2011 at 6:54 am

To compare Linden Place to the Keiths is beyond ludicrous. I walk by it a lot and it is a joke of a building. This is like comparing a Yugo to a BMW.

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on March 15, 2011 at 1:38 am

As far as what “the people” would support I was walking down 35th Ave. by Linden Place (2 blocks away from the RKO) when I looked to my right and did a double take: A large RKO sized ornate elaborately decorated building:

it almost looks like the RKO. The description:
The “Linden Place” is a large event space and banquet hall, with a ballroom dance floor, gilt dome ceiling and faux “European ” paintings that decorate the walls. The Dim Sum isn’t so bad and the kitschy decor can be kind of charming. There’s a parking garage and a large variety of rooms, complete with plush Victorian chairs, that can accommodate a number of parties.
So it would seem that “the people” could easily adapt the RKO style. Although I wonder how happy they would be with Patrick Thompson’s mass of studio apartments: lets see $160M/357 at 25K/yr = 17.7 years, yeah sure I’d lend him the money – I think Flushing needs to plan for something just in case this doesn’t happen.

BobbyS
BobbyS on March 15, 2011 at 1:12 am

I wonder how the Leow’s Kings is doing without any known parking in the area. And they are talking millions for restoration aren’t they?

gd14lawn
gd14lawn on March 15, 2011 at 1:06 am

I would think the proximity of the 7 train and the LIRR would mitigate the need for parking. Also, I seem to remember some big municipal lots in the area.

WilliamMcQuade
WilliamMcQuade on March 15, 2011 at 12:03 am

There is unfortunately no use for a big theater like this in Flushing. The people will not support it. For others not in the area you need parking. Liability there. you than need different types of restaurants. Unless you like oriental food with no other choice you are out of luck. You would than have to get funding to restore a theater with 2 strikes already against it.

Do not get me wrong. I would love for the theater to be restored as I there very early on in the bid to get it landmarked. Manes killed another dream & Schulman twisted the knife. Give the theater a decent burial & restore the lobby.

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on March 14, 2011 at 11:46 pm

There have been theaters that have burned to the ground and been restored. Restoration has run the gamut from shell to using the foyer while the auditorium is restored. I was also actually in the RKO auditorium this February and cost items like the balcony truss, hallways stairways and exterior walls are all still intact. A lot of plaster work is also there. It has been a convenient retoric to declare it beyond repair with no survey or photos. The Thompson proposal calls for a whopping $8M to restore the lobby, which is virtually intact except for the railing and fountain, most will go into the “steel cage”. The seating: a lot of the same thing and stage are the easiest to replace. The 17 story tower will cost $160M (assuming the foundation goes as planned) is a lot more of a technical challenge. But the real cost will be with the community, when you won’t be able to park, turn onto Main St. or cross the Flushing Bay bridge for 3 years because Sky View Parc, Flushing Commons, Willets Point and a host of other developments are all scheduled to go up at the same time. In the end you won’t be able to fit on the No. 7 or any bus line either.

WilliamMcQuade
WilliamMcQuade on March 14, 2011 at 11:24 pm

Thank the above plus Mr Huang & over 25 years of neglect.

What a shame as the outcome could have been different if not for Manes & Schulman.It is their legacy.