National Theatre

I’m not exactly sure but I know The Exorcist played once or twice, and so did Trainspotting I believe. Neither did that great because of the lack of advertising and what not on the GM’s part (who was heading this project)

Also, 1408 didn’t do as well as Sicko in it’s first week. No where near as well, actually but maybe it would have caught on after the second week. We will never know.

Well, I guess I’ll stop.

The reason why Simpsons Movie didn’t play is because it was obviously booked way before the new onwers got a hold of the National Theatre. That is why there were no big summer blockbuster hits at the National.

Like I said before, this is the reason why all of National’s bookings are last minute because they are only trying to get what they can which is why they were stuck with movies (although they were great movies) such as Sicko, Paris, and Rescue Dawn.

wow this board just got the attention of the guy who runs this website!!
I have noticed a pattern all over the internet, on just about every message thread that has ever existed on every subject (especially the IMDB threads) somehow they always transgress into fights and insults.

but it’s not as good as some of the 2k DLP projectors?

Is there a reason why The Simpsons Movie couldn’t have played at the National? Besides no longer being connected to a theater chain.

Where did you get the idea I checked anything for Rescue Dawn?
If you knew the showtimes on Monday or Tuesday, why did you wait to post them until Thursday?
Why is knowing these things supposed to impress anyone, and why do you still feel compelled to keep coming back with “I knew that”? You’ve really just proven my point. I needn’t comment any further, bur i’m sure you will.

The National does deserve better, but as of right now.. it’s all that it can get. Yeah.. I’m nobody..

Jet Li’s “War” isn’t playing next week either, nor are the two premieres/screenings that you had nothing to comment about. And notice how you checked today for “Rescue Dawn” yet I knew on Tuesday. It’s not TOO advanced but then again.. nothing of the National’s bookings are.

Whether or not you believe me makes no difference to me. I know where I stand… and you know where you stand. You can decided whether or not I am a fake..

Also, how would I know the pre-releases of the movies before hand? Did you know that there are 2 upcoming screenings and premieres this month and the next month? And how in the world did I know that “Becoming Jane” would be playing this friday at 12:00p 2:30p 5:00p 7:30p 10:00p?

Lucky guess..? I think not.

r0wr – Statements like “I know everything you don’t and more about the National in regards to it’s status as of now” and “I actually do know the grosses for both theatres and in actuality, they are non [sic] of your business” indicate a rather juvenile arrogance that’s neither appealing nor productive. You have no idea what experience or connections to the industry the rest of us may have, For someone who claims to be so “in the know” and such a well connected professional, I don’t see any real constructive ideas or action coming from your direction.

I know how much seats and draperies cost. I have dealt directly with the contractors and companies who supply them. I never said it would be cheap to renovate the National, only that it wouldn’t need any structural changes, and the fact is, if the National were to go on as a first class showcase it definitely needs some work done.

As for projection, I know of no commercial theatre in town that has installed 4k projection. 2k is not all that impressive on a large screen, so obviously twice the resolution would be an improvement. Claiming that the public wouldn’t notice or care about the difference is exactly the cynical attitude that has led movie exhibition from a memorable theatrical event to just a blank room with a bare screen where the picture just pops on like your TV at home.

If Sony were to install 4k they could promote the theatre as having the highest resolution digital picture in town. Even better if Sony bought the place to show off their own technology and their product and rent it out as a premiere venue. The point is that having significantly superior picture quality could at least give the National some bragging rights to distinguish it from the rest.

Same goes for the dine-in concept that’s been successful elsewhere. The National needs something to set it apart and draw more people (and more money) back. People who are eating and watching a movie spend more than the price of a standard movie ticket, and there is no theatre in town doing full food service. The little diner in the ArcLight lobby and the trays carried into a couple rooms in the Bridge don’t count.

Of course none of the things ANY of us has suggested are likely unless a miracle happens and a generous studio or a Paul Allen steps up to save the place. And such miracles are very rare. People have forgotten that we almost lost the Cinerama Dome as we know it, and very few realize that it was not the public outcry ot a change of heart at Pacific that saved it. It was a lawsuit filed by one smart Cinerama fan that could have halted the whole ArcLight project or added about 12 million to its cost. (I don’t like the navy blue curtains in the Dome at all, by the way.)

None of us is in any position to save the National, including one who claims to be so “iN with the Biz” but never offers any proof of his exaulted position. But demanding to keep the place open isn’t as effective without some real suggestions for how it might be made more profitable. Those of us who’ve been reaching for ideas are at least trying to be consturctive.

So what CAN we do"? Well if the unnamed source quoted in the Curbed LA article is right, then the name of the National’s owner is right there. Direct your petition and suggestions to him, ask some publications to investigate, ask studios to consider the possibilities… circulate fliers to get the word out… and anyone who is really “IN the Know” and in the industry should go talk to his connections and do something more constructive than shooting down all of our ideas.

r0wr r0wr. I did not try to compute in my head what percentage the Landmark made from Sicko in comparison to the National, so stop being so aggresive on this matter. Why don’t you tell us the numbers if you are privy to this knowledge? I don’t care if it is .00001%. I know, as many do here, that we cannot replace all of he National’s seats without some big money backing it. I, like others here, just want to offer ideas to help this theatre survive as long as possible in the economic envirorment it is in. And we all seem to know that will not mean going up directly against The Landmark. Kudos to the National if it didn’t do as bad as you think against the Landmark. But that alone will not keep it open. So get off our backs for putting forth ideas, as unreasonable as they might seem. “Raiders” on the National’s giant screen would have me marking my calendar. Sicko is in my Netflix queue.

I’m not trying to burst your bubble, Mark, and I am sorry if I offended you but I am just trying to tell you what’s going on. The idea of new seats and new equipment is really far-fetched and isn’t going to happen, simple as that. As longislandmovies said, 300 to replace a seat x 1000+ seats is a lot of money for a theatre that won’t even gross that much in a year.

Yes, Sicko was playing at the National and yes, the Landmark did make more. What do you expect? They are a brand new movie theatre where the parking isn’t super expensive like it is in Westwood. Sicko was a gerat film to play at the National; if they didn’t get Sicko, they would have got some other crappy moie that would have made even less. Oh yeah that’s gonna help with the grosses, right?

people dont care on digital or film …also think about 300 per to replace seats at a cost of $330,000 TOTAL!