CIBC Theatre

18 W. Monroe Street,
Chicago, IL 60603

Unfavorite 18 people favorited this theater

Showing 26 - 50 of 76 comments

Broan
Broan on January 21, 2008 at 4:10 pm

Some research has indicated that Rapp’s involvement may have been limited to the elaborately themed and now lost mens and women’s lounges

Broan
Broan on January 21, 2008 at 3:58 pm

Here is a better scan of the Majestic Bar’s interior. Again, this is now the ticket lobby.

Broan
Broan on October 6, 2007 at 12:22 pm

Although the merger has been ongoing since April, Lasalle Bank is now officially part of Bank of America and will soon be rebranded accordingly; presumably, the theater will follow suit. Let’s all hope it becomes the Bank of America Majestic Theatre.

RickB
RickB on July 30, 2007 at 4:06 pm

“Citi Wang” would be bad enough, but “Wang Citi” would be even worse…

AdoraKiaOra
AdoraKiaOra on July 29, 2007 at 10:35 am

It can only look better than it did before. Verty depressing place when i sat there in the mid 90s.

CHICTH74
CHICTH74 on July 28, 2007 at 6:17 pm

Yes it does i was thinking right along thoes lines !!! LOL
My question is this is their some one involved in the planing or the nameing pros. that looks at what the name will be?
So that situations like this would not happen?

Also can you invision CITI-WANG THEATRE emblazened across a marquee or up on a vert. sign ? LOL

Thank you for you time and have a good day :)

hanksykes
hanksykes on July 28, 2007 at 1:27 pm

Chicagoins cheer up! It could be worse in Boston the glorious Metropolitan Th. first became the Wang Center to salute the computor corporation who greatly helped with the renovation. Now, the theatre is becoming the Citi-Wang Theatre to honor the Citi Bank which has given money, it sounds like the title of a porno film, Citi-Wang!

Ret. AKC (NAC) CCC Bob Jensen, Manteno, Illinois
Ret. AKC (NAC) CCC Bob Jensen, Manteno, Illinois on April 30, 2007 at 4:04 pm

Tonight on WBEZ Radio (NPR in Chicago) I heard that the Bank of Scotland is also interested in acquiring LaSalle Bank. What would the theatre be called then?

“Gee dad it was a WurliTzer!”

Ret. AKC (NAC) CCC Bob Jensen, Manteno, Illinois
Ret. AKC (NAC) CCC Bob Jensen, Manteno, Illinois on April 24, 2007 at 2:14 am

G. Feret, I don’t know how much help this is, but MY FAIR LADY was not released until October 21, 1964.

“Ladies and Gentlemen, This Is CINERAMA!”

RickB
RickB on April 24, 2007 at 1:27 am

With yesterday’s announcement that Bank of America will be acquiring LaSalle Bank, it looks like this theater will get another new name…

AdoraKiaOra
AdoraKiaOra on March 21, 2007 at 1:34 pm

Thank goodness for this renovation or whatever you want to call it but at least it looks like a theatre again. The Shubert and the Golden Gate in San Francisco are the most depressing theatres to see a show! Now lets get The Gate looking grand again!

GFeret
GFeret on January 11, 2007 at 11:30 am

They have to call it the LASALLE BANK THEATER; is it a bank, or a theater; a theater or a bank, etc. 2 mints in one!

The description says it sometimes played films. This jogs my memory that MY FAIR LADY was road-showed there (1963). Si? No?

Broan
Broan on December 3, 2006 at 7:03 pm

Here are photos of this theater.

Broan
Broan on November 27, 2006 at 5:36 pm

The building has just been dramatically cleaned and had its Terra Cotta repaired. The scaffolding is down and it looks wonderful, aside from that silly marquee.

Broan
Broan on November 1, 2006 at 11:56 am

Here is a postcard view of the Majestic building.

Broan
Broan on August 20, 2006 at 10:50 am

Here is an early interior view of the Majestic Bar, which is the space that was recently incorporated into the lobby as a lounge and box office. All of it is gone now except the ceiling, but it seems that nobody realized even that was there until the restoration started.

CHICTH74
CHICTH74 on June 12, 2006 at 7:33 am

Thank You for the information i will have it look in to the Studerbaker/Playhouse theatre.
I know that what is now the “Artest`s cafe” was whare the Studerbaker showroom was that is why the buld. is called the Sudebaker Buld.
And on the corner of Michigan/Vanburen i think that is some kind of private club. that was the sight of the 1st art instute, then they moved it to the present lo cal. Whare the Art Instute sits now was a structure theat was the setting for a Opera fest.
Witch was how the Auditorium Theatre came to be the Opera Company had no real home and a man named F.Peck came up with the idea for the theatre.
And here we are to day.
But i will check out the Studebaker/playhouse.
Thank you for your time and space.:)

Broan
Broan on June 12, 2006 at 1:08 am

That is strange. I think the Studebaker/Playhouse theaters next to the auditorium would predate it as well. Maybe they just didn’t do their homework. The ticket scanners are really to avoid counterfeit tickets. That way, once a given barcode is scanned, they can be sure no one else comes in with a copy. It also lets people use print-at-home tickets, which are increasingly popular.

CHICTH74
CHICTH74 on June 11, 2006 at 7:42 pm

A few “COMMENTS” about the new LaSalle Bank Theatre…..
I just finshed waching the 190n special on it and here are my comments.
I like the new paint i think that thay did a good job in the auditorium, The seats look soft and comfortable, I do not care for the top of the marquee from my point of view the top of the marquee looks like the grill off of a old car. And i ask this question….
All through the 190n show they kept on saying the the Majestic,Shubert LaSalle Bank Theatre or what ever you want to call it was the oldest theatre at time of compleation is this true?

I mean what about Adler and Sulivans “AUDITORIUM THEATRE” (50 E.Congress PWK.) That whole bulding the hotel and the theatre were compleated in somthing like 1888-1889. Can some one please make some sence out of this for me?
Also i have to ask this question,what is going on with the “Handheld ticket scanners” i my oppnion the scanners are to be used in a venue like a ballpark or some other large venue not in a theatre certany not in a theatre that seats something like 2,000 people.
Just my POV THANK YOU for you time and space.

CHICTH74
CHICTH74 on June 11, 2006 at 11:27 am

Well all that i have to say is thank you.
And it is nice to hear that at least the name of the Majestic is going to be used in some form. I have not realy looked at the marquee that well i will have to look for it later or to night when 190n does the show on it,i have heard that the marquee is “something to see”! the reason i think is to get more people over there becuse if you can recall eather in winter or when the weather is bad it is very dark around their and thay want people to be able to find it.

Just a Thought. Thanks

Thank You For Your Time.

Broan
Broan on June 10, 2006 at 7:48 pm

Well, Shubert had become something of a misnomer, because the Shubert organization had sold the theater to the Nederlanders (basically their broadway arch-rivals) in the early 90s; however, they never changed the name. The Majestic name hadn’t been used for the theatre since the early 1930s – although the office building had retained it – so there was little pressure to use that, especially considering that the new hotel in the former office building is going to be, I think, Hampton Suites at the Majestic Building. Considering Lasalle Bank was forking over so much to renovate it, it must have seemed fitting to rename it that way. I really don’t like the new marquee, though. It looks goofy and doesn’t really resemble any of the historic marquees except the Shubert one, only with the added odd curvy thing on top. One nice touch, though, is that the bottom of the canopy is modeled after the original metal that had been left in place all those years, exposed during the renovation. [url=http://iconeon.blogspot.com/2006/05/majestic-shubert-lasalle-banktheater.html]Here]Here} is the article i’ve mostly paraphrased that covers it well.

CHICTH74
CHICTH74 on June 10, 2006 at 5:54 pm

Thank you for explaning now that makes it a bit more lucid to me.
One other thing,do you know if the first name was even thought to be used? The Palace , and The Orential have their “first” names in on the marquee just wondering why the Majestic name or for the mater the shubert names were not kept?

Broan
Broan on June 10, 2006 at 5:20 pm

As I see it, a restoration is interested in taking a place as close as feasible to opening day (Really, none of the major downtown Chicago theaters has been FULLY restored). The effect of history and its changes should be mostly invisible. Here, they just tried to make it resemble its original decor; at least on the opening tours, you could see plaster with built-up, chunky paint obscuring detail, poorly painted sections, et cetera, especially in the balcony. They clearly had to rush to make it open, even despite the time overruns. One review of the work noted an inordinate amount of sheetrock. Now, they could have spent 5 times more and done a full restoration. I don’t think that’s really appropriate,and I don’t really have any problem with the job they did- though it would have been cool if they had tried to recreate the long-lost themed bathrooms. It’s a fine house and one Chicago can be proud of.

CHICTH74
CHICTH74 on June 10, 2006 at 7:43 am

The show 190n is going to have from what i have ben told a whole show about the theatre to be aired on Sunday June 11th 2006 @ 1035pm(cdt) right after the 10:00pm News cast the show will be named…..
“190 North goes inside the LaSalle Bank Theatre” from what i was told and from what i have seen in the prevews thay are going to go “behind the curtain” type of thing. Thanks for your time if you can watch please do it. thanks again.

CHICTH74
CHICTH74 on June 10, 2006 at 7:37 am

Can you tell me what the diferance between a “restoration” and a “historically sensitive renovation”?
Also what is your take on the name “ The LaSalle Bank Theatre”?