Criterion Theatre

1514 Broadway,
New York, NY 10036

Unfavorite 27 people favorited this theater

Showing 476 - 500 of 610 comments

davidil
davidil on July 13, 2005 at 11:19 am

Does anyone know if Courage of Lassie opened at the Loews Criterion in Times Square in July 1946?

RobertR
RobertR on July 6, 2005 at 6:11 pm

I know the summer of 1977 the Astor Plaza had “Star Wars”, and the State must have had 2 better pictures for “Orca” to have opened at the Criterion. Paramount films usually played Loew’s Theatres.
View link

RobertR
RobertR on July 4, 2005 at 8:53 am

Here is the Criterion day and dating with the Sutton.

Gerald A. DeLuca
Gerald A. DeLuca on July 4, 2005 at 7:19 am

This theatre was called the Criterion Center 4 when, around Christmas of 1980, I saw Martin Scorsese’s Raging Bull here in a kind of basement cinema.

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on June 27, 2005 at 9:34 am

Alien was the last movie I saw at the Criterion. I went because I had just seen Funny Girl at the Music Hall and was feeling very nostalgic. Superman was the last movie I saw at the Criterion that I liked. I had first seen it in the suburbs. Oh why couldn’t it have opened at the Criterion instead of the Astor Plaza? And two years before why couldn’t Star Wars open there instead of the Astor Plaza?
If only people had realized it was a far greater movie theater than the Ziegfeld.

With the Gordon’s Gin sign above it and the Bond store and the Woolworths it was one of New Yorks greatest blocks. In later years I actually heard while walking on the opposite side of the street on a few occasions strangers comment to each other how the block had really deteriorated and they couldn’t believe it. I guess they had seen it for many years before its descent into cheap camera and souvenir stores and the Criterion’s descent into black exploitation.
When the National(ugh)was playing the ‘73 revival of SOM the Criterion was playing Wattstoxx. A block above Loew’s State was playing Lost Horizon.
How did the Criterion which was New Yorks greatest house in the 60'so quickly lose all its luster and turn into a grind house? Even the Rivoli and the Loew’s State had far better bookings into the 70’s.

Coate
Coate on June 26, 2005 at 3:11 pm

“May 25,1979 when Fox opened ‘Alien’ it was only at 70mm houses.” (RobertR, Jun 15, 2005)


This is only partially correct. Most of the initial engagements were 70mm, including all of the NYC area showings. San Diego showed it in 35mm, and other markets had 70mm and 35mm showings. This is explained in detail in this article:
View link

Re the Criterion, there are photos from the the “Alien” engagement on the “Alien Quadrilogy” DVD.

Vito
Vito on June 26, 2005 at 9:27 am

Robert, fun looking at those ads, thanks!
It also reminded me of how in the 60s, the ads no longer carried tags like Roadshow or 70mm stereophonic sound. Of course
“Funny Girl” should have read, “Presented in washed out 70mm blow up. I’m not bitter, I prefered the 70mm to 35mm, even the blow ups. I just wished there had been more movies shot in 70mm.
Still, the Criterion was a great place to see a roadshow. Would you happenen to have any "10 Commandments” ads or from any during the fabulous 50s?

RobertR
RobertR on June 26, 2005 at 7:50 am

The great days of the Criterion!!

View link

RobertR
RobertR on June 15, 2005 at 10:32 am

May 25,1979 when Fox opened “Alien” it was only at 70mm houses. The Criterion played it around the clock 24 hours the first 2 days. It also opened at Loews Orpheum and Loews New York Twin. In Long Island it played UA Syosset and in New Jeresy RKO Paramus Quad and the General Cinema Menlo Park Cinema.

RobertR
RobertR on June 3, 2005 at 3:41 pm

Boy how times had changed on Sept 27, 1972 “Blacula” from American International Pictures was playing here in its Exclusive New York Engagement. Nice to know the Criterion was still getting pictures exclusive before they opened all over town. This was the time of all those blacksplotation films. At the same time “Super Fly” was playing at Loews State 2 and Loews Cine.

Thomas
Thomas on May 8, 2005 at 7:46 pm

Look at the Criterion Center from the 1980's
View link

YMike
YMike on April 28, 2005 at 12:57 pm

The basement theatres were tiny. I saw Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure at one of them and it felt like you were watching the film on a big screen television. The screen was that small!

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on April 28, 2005 at 12:13 pm

The Warner Cinerama kept the Cinerama orchestra just as it was after they separated the balcony without putting in a low ceiling. So the 70mm on Broadway festival at the end of the 70’s was wonderful.
The Criterion during its road show era was one of the greats. Too bad they didn’t maintain this instead of the Ziegfeld. The Criterion was champagne, the Ziegfeld coca cola.

William
William on April 28, 2005 at 11:44 am

I never went into the basement theatres at the Criterion. Over at the Egyptian UA built a twin in an old store, it was the pitts. Loews did a nice job with the State.

RobertR
RobertR on April 28, 2005 at 11:04 am

William
To call the Egyptian run down at it’s sad UA end is actually a compliment. It was WORSE then the 42nd St houses in their waning days. I never got to see the Criterion again after they made it a sixplex. As a twin it was not horrible compared to the things we have now, at least the auditoriums were large. How small were the basement theatres? By the way I think the only theatre that survived twinning and was still a class house was the original Loews State. The upstairs theatre contained the whole original house except for under the balcony where they built the new auditorium.

William
William on April 28, 2005 at 10:45 am

Celluloid Freak thats the way UA Theatres let many of their once pristine houses go. During its last days as a movie house UA let their prize Hollywood house the Egyptian run down.

celluloid
celluloid on April 15, 2005 at 7:57 pm

Unlike most people, I was happy to see the Criterion go to make way for the new Loews E-Walk and AMC Empire. In the summer of ‘90 I entered the Criterion for the first and only time to see “Die Hard 2” in 70mm on “balcony” level auditorium, then sneaking onto the “orchestra” theatre before that was twinned. Not impressed with what I saw I checkout the restrooms in the basement which were in pityful condition. Also, to my surprise there was this long abandoned hallway that eventually lead to an emergency exit door to one of the cheap, poorly constructed auditoriums in the basement. This was truly one of the grossest filmgoing experiances of my life. The place was dark and ugly and thought “what the hell have I gotten myself into” and wondered if the NYPD should close this place down. I checked out all four theatres and all had THE worst projection and sound I ever seen. The place was just filthy and the patrons seedy. I didn’t want to sit next to any of those weirdos. Luckily I managed to get out of there alive and never went back. Good-bye Criterion!

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on April 15, 2005 at 4:42 pm

This was posted today on a theater chat site regarding the question of film musicals adapted from the stage. I wish I knew who the person is who wrote it and where they saw this. I am not registered on this site so could not respond. Maybe somebody out there knows where this took place. World premiere was at the criterion.

I understand a lot of people think “South Pacific,” as a film, is boring and the color is overdone.
But recently, I had this privilege to see the film in its complete premiere version (170 mins — 20 minutes longer than the video, TV, LD, and DVD version). Not only this — most important of all, it was shown in its original Todd-AO format, on a gigantic deep-curved screen, with the magnificent six-channel magnetic soundtracks! When the song “Bali Hai” reached its climax, with the close-up of Juanita Hall’s tremendous face on that 25-odd feet high, 60-odd feet long deep-curved screen, I was transfixed. And if there is a musical heaven, one of its greatest attractions must be when Alfred Newman’s orchestra doing “I’m in Love with a Wonderful Guy” and is played on the six-channel Todd-AO stereophonic sound system. I can still feel the chills down my spine when writing this. It is an experience of lifetime.

Many said that the musical numbers filmed with the color-filter were overdone, but on the contrary, the problem of this film is within the segments WITHOUT the color filters. Just as the director, Joshua Logan, once predicted, the glorious on-location scenes of Hawaii are too beautiful. Much too beautiful and colorful that we were often drawn away from the dramatic center to appreciate the glorious color possessed by some flowers in the background…

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on April 15, 2005 at 2:09 pm

That’s astounding as it seems to me one of the worst adaptations of a musical I have seen. Earlier that year in ‘71 I had seen the Broadway production only a few blocks north of the Rivoli at the Broadway theater and I was overwhelmed. Magnificently stage by Jerome Robbins and designed by the genius of Boris Aronson it was filled with joy and color. The grainy, washed out neutered bore I saw on the curved screen at the Rivoli to a huge sold out house was a huge dissapointment. I watched a little of it recently on TCM and it was just as dull and unimaginative as I remembered. It played on roadshow for over a year and I never went back. Too bad as it was the last successful musical roadshow. I’m glad though you liked it as in and of itself it is a great work. I haven’t seen the current production but you might want to take your daughter to it.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on April 15, 2005 at 1:57 pm

Vincent: “Nicholas and Alexandra” was a 70mm blowup at the Criterion:

View link

I saw it there on a high school class trip and thought it looked incredible. I can remember how certain shots looked on that screen even now. It’s a very good movie, even on TV. If you still don’t like it, take a look at today’s movie section in the paper and see what junk is playing nowadays. It’ll make you appreciate “Nicholas” that much more. Maybe you should see “Fiddler” again also – it’s a great movie. That was a 70mm blowup as well, but I only got to see it in 35mm in Rutherford, NJ.

chconnol
chconnol on April 15, 2005 at 1:40 pm

Vincent: I never saw “Nicholas & Alexandria” but I think that “Fiddler” is one of the finest musicals ever made. I’ve only seen it on TV but it’s an under rated masterpiece. I didn’t win Best Picture that year because I think by 1971, the country’s mood had drastically changed and were more than burnt out by the onslaught of musicals that were heaped upon them after “The Sound of Music” and “My Fair Lady”. But I’ve read more than one critical history that claims that “The French Connection’s” win over “Fiddler” that year was a mistake but the Academy was reflecting the changing times and tastes.

Anyway, that’s a major digression. Why was “Fiddler” lousy? Lousy film or presentation at The Rivoli? I understand that it was one of the last Roadshows.

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on April 15, 2005 at 1:28 pm

Well CC I only caught the tail end of it as well as the movies I mentioned above were in Times Square first run for me only names on a marquee. (Did though see Fair Lady at the Cri in both 65 and 71.)Then saw Nick and Alex at the Cri in 71 and Fiddler at the Riv. Lousy both of them. And neither in 70mm!

chconnol
chconnol on April 15, 2005 at 12:27 pm

You and I might pay that much for a film in a big theater with a big screen and great sound. But I’m sorry. I see these people buying stacks of DVDs at the Virgin Megastore (ironically the site of the old Loews State) and these people would never do that. There’s no market anymore for films to open in a spectacular way. The reason is not so much that the public wouldn’t go but because the studios have switched their priorities away from the theatrical releases to home entertainment. This is not publicized by the studios but it’s a known fact.

It’s sad for us who remember how special it could be to see an event film in a theater. You and a lot of the others on this site remember even bigger, better times. I only remember the tail end of it. But it’s enough for me to lament it’s passing.

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on April 15, 2005 at 10:13 am

CC I think the top for SOM at the Rivoli was $4.50 whereas the top for Fair Lady at the Criterion was a full dollar more for a whopping $5.50. This was four years before Funny Girl! I believe in an article at the end of ‘68 the Criterion manager said that the mezz seats were sold out through Feb '69. I remember my mother telling me that my aunt spent 4.00 a ticket for Fair Lady in Asbury Park(this was at the St James on roadshow.) I thought that was a crazy amount of money to spend on a movie.
Today if the Riv and the Cri still existed I would happily pay $40 for a 70mm film.