RKO Keith's Theatre

135-35 Northern Boulevard,
Flushing, NY 11354

Unfavorite 51 people favorited this theater

Showing 501 - 525 of 1,324 comments

bazookadave
bazookadave on January 15, 2011 at 4:14 am

I am reminded of comments several years ago about this glass curtain…if the lobby (I assume they mean the foyer that the ticket lobby leads to), is going to be visible from the street through a curtain of glass, then the landmarked structure over the ticket lobby (the plaster gallery with the polychromed pillars and ceiling) and the three baroque-style arches above the foyer entrance will have to be removed to clear the sight-line. This cannot be done if these portions of the structure are part of the landmarked room. I don’t think the developers really know what they are working with or what they are talking about, and are simply regurgitating old info.

I believe the ticket lobby and foyer are both landmarked and therefore must be accessible to the public for viewing and inspection. It stinks that the theater, mezzanine and office building will be demolished but if the foyer is restored, it had better be available to those of us in the public who wish to view it! I imagine the developers will turn it into a mall, with shops on the first floor and second floor on a new mezzanine level.

NativeForestHiller
NativeForestHiller on January 15, 2011 at 2:34 am

This appears on the Rego-Forest Preservation Council Blog:

“Coming Attraction: Nightmare At The RKO Keith’s Theatre”

View link

It takes into account the History At Sake segment with an article in Crain’s, & David He’s quintessential peace capturing sentiments & the vision of members of Rego-Forest Preservation Council & Friends of The RKO Keith’s Flushing Theatre.

Shall we settle for a Landmark or a glass high-rise rental with a curtain-wall lobby? Post a comment on the blog link, & spread the word!

gd14lawn
gd14lawn on January 15, 2011 at 2:23 am

I think larry1 was being sarcastic.

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on January 15, 2011 at 2:18 am

“Big deal”? “Big deal”? Who ARE you people???

lfreimauer
lfreimauer on January 14, 2011 at 8:44 pm

Wonderful old theater with perhaps a lobby remaining. Big deal!

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on January 14, 2011 at 8:16 pm

Oh, puh-lease! Where are you new guys suddenly coming from? I don’t mean to seem rude, but could you take the time to actually read some of what has already been posted before jumping in?

MovieBear
MovieBear on January 14, 2011 at 8:09 pm

Well, at least the lobby will survive:

View link

gd14lawn
gd14lawn on January 14, 2011 at 5:23 pm

On December 8 DaveBazooka posted a comment which quotes the landmark law as saying interior landmarks have to be open to the public on a regular basis. The NY Post article sounds like the lobby will be visible through a glass curtain or wall. Is thiis considered ‘open to the public’?

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on January 14, 2011 at 4:23 pm

I have vivid memories from my childhood of when the New York Post was actually a “newspaper” rather than simply a venue for unadulterated public relations crap from developers. What a load!

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on January 14, 2011 at 2:46 am

If there is one thing that Flushing needs less of it is more congestion and rental/condos. To convert the RKO into 357 rental units while at the same time developing Flushing Commons' 620 condos with the Macedonia Plaza’s 140 “affordable” units, also adding another 652 condos to the existing 448 condos at ‘Sky View Parc’(how are they doing these days?), not to mention the 72-unit Prince Plaza, the Victoria Tower, 38-30 Parsons Boulevard and converting the YMCA into more condos (so that they can move into Flushing Commons) in a three year construction phase is something that Flushing will never recover from.

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on January 14, 2011 at 12:16 am

I still don’t understand why it is “too late” for the Keith’s Flushing. Is Flushing any less in need or less deserving of a community performing space than are any of those other communities? I suppose you could say “yes” to the latter, since it appears the immediate community has never generated much support or enthusiasm for the restoration effort. Is the auditorium so completely beyond repair that any thought of restoration is unrealistic? Not according to the numerous reports posted above, which indicate many of the architectural details either remain or could be recreated using the detailed architectural drawings that exist. Is it absolutely essential that the auditorium be demolished in order to do anything with this site? The article quotes Council member Koo as saying the community is dismayed by the building’s “abhorrent” condition. But since nobody can even see what it looks like inside, what makes its condition a problem is that it is an entire block of empty, boarded up stores with a facade that has been systematically dismantled. Is it completely beyond anyone’s architectural and structural engineering capabilities to utilize the air rights above the auditorium without actually demolishing the auditorium? Is the extra effort and expense that would entail so totally outrageous that there is no possible way it could be achieved, or is it simply that it’s easier and cheaper to knock it down? The building has already sat empty for decades; why is it necessary that construction begin now, when the economic and real estate climate is at such an all-time low that anything requiring added expense is laughed at? Would it not be possible to build above and around the theater, leaving its rehabilitation for a time when there are more resources? I’m asking these questions because I’m not sure where the “it’s too late” verdict is suddenly coming from.

NativeForestHiller
NativeForestHiller on January 13, 2011 at 11:53 pm

The fact I disagree with is the need to limit what you can save. Putting tax credits, grants, subsidies, and low-interest loans aside (as helpful as they are), in many cases, incorporating existing features (restored over the long-term or not) into a new use for the space will prove to be more economical than the high cost of demolition and new construction, particularly in this economy. As a preservationist, you should strive for all remnant theaters, since there are far fewer these days to save. That is my philosophy, and we should do all that we can before any bulldozers potentially come. Thank you for your compliments in regard to my work. I am impressed with the rundown of theaters you mentioned, and hope many more will be saved.

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on January 13, 2011 at 11:45 pm

I very much appreciate all of your efforts to save the Ridgewood, but I am not sure what you are disagreeing with. It is a simple fact that not all of the old movie palaces can or could be saved. There were simply too many of them. Real estate is worth a lot in this city. Restoration costs a lot of money and we cannot expect private developers to just throw money out the window just because they’re nice. In these bad economic times you also cannot rely on government grants and tax benefits. So what do we do? You try to save the most promising and most beautiful of the old theaters. After 30 years, we have finally saved the Loews Kings (along with the Uptown in Chicago) probably the most spectacular unrenovated theater in the country. This DID come with city tax breaks, but this theater is extraordinary and deserved them. The Brooklyn Paramount has the advantage of being held by LIU and so I have great hope that this will someday be restored. The Loew’s Canal is now held by an investor who wants to create a community performing arts center for Chinatown. The Loew’s Shore is in the rapidly developing entertainment area of Coney Island and may be able to serve as a concert venue and performance space. The Jackson is now held by an Indian businessman who hopes to cater to his community while at the same time restoring this special theater. The RKO Richmond Hill, though incredibly, substantially intact, is in a poor location to serve as an arts venue. It’s hard to see how this theater could ever be restored without significant outside help. The Ridgewood you know very well. I have greatly admired your work. It is too late for the RKO Keiths Flushing, but I am grateful that a piece of it will remain. I also worry long term about theaters like the Paris (a very special gem) and the Ziegfeld which in my opinion should be landmarked as the epitome of the modern Movie Palace in addition to its illustrious history as the home to an incredible amount of movie premieres and engagements. Again, kudos to you NativeForestHiller for your passion and your persistence.

NativeForestHiller
NativeForestHiller on January 13, 2011 at 11:21 pm

I disagree. We should aim for the preservation and restoration &/or reconstruction of as much as possible from square 1, and do all we potentially can proactively & in the moment when necessary. Smaller scale theaters can be considered miniature palaces. America’s foremost theater architect Thomas Lamb’s greatest works in Queens include the RKO Keith’s Flushing Theatre & the Ridgewood Theatre; the latter of which is his earliest extant theater design. If you were in the theater in the late 70s, you would clearly recall the auditorium’s smaller scale palatial feel. The proscenium has since been unveiled. Never consider anything a lost cause. There are no bulldozers. Stand up for what the majority believes in! Even if the Ridgewood becomes a supermarket, there’s no reason a performing arts space can’t co-exist, likely increasing the building’s revenue. The supermarket can be built around the original architectural features(restored or not or restored over the long-term), giving the site a more distinctive environment with a historic customers for customers and die-hard theater preservationists & patrons.

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on January 13, 2011 at 9:44 pm

No Larry, I do not, but….My passion is for the architecture of these palaces. If the lobby is truly restored and saved, then that is a wonderful thing. All that is left of the Loew’s Triboro, another spectacular theater, is the shell. Everything was lost. Would you rather lose everything here? Not me. At least here, the incredible lobby will still be here and a piece of Flushing history will be preserved. We have to pick our battles. Not every theater can be saved. The best of the remaining theaters that can be saved are the Loews Kings (already in progress), the Brooklyn Paramount (a fairly good chance as it is held by LIU), the Loews Canal (newly landmarked), the Loews Shore (newly landmarked) and the RKO Keiths Richmond Hill (who knows) and the Jackson (currently under new ownership and claims of renovation. The Ridgewood is also apparently a lost cause as it is becoming a supermarket, but this was the least “palace like” of all of the the aforementioned theaters.

lfreimauer
lfreimauer on January 13, 2011 at 5:42 pm

Do you think that a promise to “restore” the lobby means that the theater is saved. Not as far as I am concerned.

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on January 13, 2011 at 4:50 pm

It looks like the deal to convert to residential is back on! The auditorium will be gone, but the new developer promises to “fully restore” the lobby to its full grandeur. let’s not kid ourselves. This theater was not going to be restored in its entirety. We have to be grateful that at least a significant portion with remain of this spectacular palace. All the more reason to make sure that we save the Loews Kings, the Loews Canal, the RKO Keiths Richmond Hill and the Brooklyn Paramount. These theaters can realistically be saved. p.s. I know that the Kings has already be saved, but I’ll fully believe it when I see actual progress.

The article below appeared today in Crains New York Business:

The landmarked but badly rundown RKO Keith’s Theatre in the heart of Flushing, Queens will be reborn as a huge apartment complex with 357 rental units and 360 parking spaces, according to a new filing by the project’s developer, Patrick Thompson.
Developer Shaya Boymelgreen, the previous owner of the site, had planned to build a condominium tower there. Last month, Mr. Thompson submitted an application with the city’s Board of Standards and Appeals for changes to the development, which he first proposed after taking over the property last year.
His new application calls for a big increase in the number of units and a slight increase in commercial space, to 17,460 square feet from 10,957 square feet. Previously, the development, located on Northern Boulevard, was approved for 200 units and 229 parking spaces. The 314,000-square-foot project is estimated to cost $160 million.
The BSA is expected to vote on the amendments in March after Community Board 7 meets and provides its recommendation for the plan on Jan. 18. CB 7 approval is not needed for BSA approval, but it will be taken into consideration, said Howard Goldman, Mr. Thompson’s land use attorney for the project.
“We’ve made the rounds with local politicians and will meet with the Community Board,” said Mr. Thompson, who has built several smaller condo projects in Manhattan. RKO would be his largest project to date and his first in the outer boroughs. “We think everything will be acceptable.”
Mr. Thompson decided to make the proposed RKO Plaza a market-rate rental project because the condo market in Flushing has been slow, and condo prices have yet to recover.
“It’s hard to build a condo project in today’s market environment,” he said, noting several projects in the area are sitting idle. “Local politicians are warmly receiving a rental and believe there is a need for rental building in Flushing.”
“For years, this RKO Keith site has been neglected and has fallen into a state of severe disrepair, causing concern for local residents,” said Councilmember Peter Koo in a statement. Mr. Koo acknowledged meeting Mr. Thompson but refrained from supporting the project until the CB meeting next week. “It is my hope that through a process of community input and governmental negotiations, renovation can begin to improve its current abhorrent condition.”
Mr. Thompson hopes to start construction of the project later this year. But construction financing is contingent upon BSA approval.
Mr. Thompson, who said the theater’s lobby will be preserved under his plans, took over the property last year when he paid $20 million for the mortgage from Doral Bank, after Mr. Boymelgreen defaulted on the loan.

bazookadave
bazookadave on December 9, 2010 at 1:44 am

Just saw the Daily News article about the Ridgewood Theater on Myrtle Avenue, about how a rubbish collector went in and found lovely artifacts. Part of the article says:

“Queens boasts only a handful of interior landmarks, which must be regularly open to the public, including the RKO Keith’s movie theater in Flushing and the Marine Air Terminal at LaGuardia Airport.”

What does this mean? Can the public demand to be allowed into the interior of the RKO so we can check on it and photograph it? It ticks me off that it is off limits.

CSWalczak
CSWalczak on September 28, 2010 at 5:19 pm

A developer now wants to expand the number of apartments as part of the Keith’s redevelopment: View link

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on July 28, 2010 at 1:59 am

Nice job! Thanks for the photo credit!
(Though some of your captions do go by kind of quick…)

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on July 22, 2010 at 5:55 pm

Click the above pic to launch video

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on July 21, 2010 at 2:49 am

A short video about the RKO

gd14lawn
gd14lawn on June 13, 2010 at 3:57 am

It sounds like bad news but we can hope he is an unsuccessful as the past couple of developers. I just hope he doesn’t do any further damage.

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on June 12, 2010 at 3:24 am

Another pledge to fully restore… the lobby. Rest of the theater? Not so much.

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on May 28, 2010 at 12:47 am

Oh, this sounds bad. Despite setting up a new corporation called Northern RKO, LLC, specifically to make this purchase and saying “the goal is to build something reflecting the magnificence of the old Keith’s for Flushing,” the new owner has two condo projects currently under development. Probably the only “reflection” of the magnificent old Keith’s will be a mirror in what’s left of the lobby.