Circle Cinemas

399 Chestnut Hill Avenue,
Brookline, MA 02146

Unfavorite 9 people favorited this theater

Showing 76 - 100 of 114 comments

hanksykes
hanksykes on October 18, 2006 at 11:56 am

There is a fine article in the 1946 Theatre Catalogue about the erection of the original Circle Cinema then known as the Circle Theater. Sumner Redstone revamped the original Circle Theater into the Circle Cinema as part of the Showcase Cinema chain in 1965. Redstone had 40 Drive Screens at that time and only 8 Indoor Screens. I was an usher at the Circle during 1966-67while attending <Leland Powers School of Radio,Television,and Theatre Sept thru June of those two years. Remembering some of the grand regional premieres ‘The Oscar’, with live Hollywood Stars Elke Sommer,Eleanor Parker,Edie Adams, and what appeared to be a rather tipsy Stephen Boyd,(Messala how you’ve slipped !). Displayed in our Circle lobby with a full time Pinkerton guard, were Edith Head’s and Walter Brennan’s real Oscars. Ms. Head’s was heavier than Mr. Brennan’s because hers was made of metal and his was of plaster since there was a scrap metal drive in effect during WW2 when his waws awarded. I know the weight difference because one late night after we closed under the intense glare of our Pinkerton friend I held them both while the Night Cleaner dusted their display case. So once in my life I recieved two Oscars if only momentarily. We opened with a fully costumed staff of 40 employees, Ushers in blue wool gold braid Brooks Brothers ($75.00) jackets, Candy Girls and Box Office Woman Cashiers in the same blue colors. There were two Ladies Room Attendants dressed as French Maids to assist Women patrons. A very tall Doorman in greatcoat with huge golden epalets swung open the entrance doors for arriving fans. This large staff was paired back to 25 by the end of our first month. The single screen Circle Cinema seated 1'500 with orchestra and one balcony in 1966, our screen had a tan travelor curtain with gold threads imbedded as spotlights were able to color the drape many different shades,no stage was found behind the curtain , but there was an Art Gallery in the balcony area where local artists works could be purchased, and a lovely live plant Conservatory, until the Ushering staff killed the plants with windex dumped into the large and heavy watering pails which had to be transported up a long flight of stairs. Our Day Manager,Ed Harwood, was dfressed in a dark business suit and our Night Manager, Mr. Muir, was always attired in a blck tux. Nine Par king Wranglers in white duster overcoats helped to squeeze the arriving autos into the toooo small car parking lot, and they secured the overflow vehicles illegally along a side street which strangly never received tickets, so go figure! We played manylong run road shows like,“The Great Race”, during that stint the management noticed at the same point in the screening each run many of the customers would head for the lobby concession stand to buy a “Coke”. Somewhat puzzled the Manager requested to see that particular reel at the evenings end and surprise,surprise, he and the Union Projectionist found subliminal Coke single frames had been added to that reel; a replacement was soon at hand. The Ushering Staff all male wer3e trained by ,Ed White< from the Redstone Front Office. Part of the ushering costume was a spotless pair of white gloves which were changed periodically if soiled, a flashlight was utilized to seatour guests in the darkened house during the film show, even a flashlight code was discretely used againstour white gloved fingers to check for available seating in the balcony, singles or doubles as the necessity arose. I still remember we were taught to say to the patrons ,“Right this way ,Please,” not ,“Not follow me.”,when seating them. I’m still using that polite phrase while dealing with the public even today, as it denotes the idea that you are graiciously waiting to serve just that specific person. “Thank you Showcase for those mannerly fundementals!”.

ErikH
ErikH on October 9, 2006 at 1:14 pm

Understood re: independent/art/foreign exclusives, which I would put in a different category from major studio releases.

A clarification to my earlier post: the “Paint Your Wagon” engagement at the Circle was also a roadshow.

The twinning of the Circle in 1976 was a real shame. In my opinion, by the mid-1970s the only theater in the Boston area that compared to the Circle in terms of the “big screen experience” (i.e., large screen size, 70MM capability and quality sound system) was the main auditorium of the Charles—-and the Charles didn’t have those comfortable rocking chairs. Although the Sack Cinema 57 and Cheri then featured top releases (and sometimes in 70MM), the screens in those complexes couldn’t compare to the Circle or Charles.

Ron Newman
Ron Newman on October 9, 2006 at 11:55 am

Although in recent years, some independent, art, and foreign films have shown exclusively at Brookline’s Coolidge Corner Theatre or the West Newton Cinema.

ErikH
ErikH on October 9, 2006 at 11:47 am

Many, but hardly all, of the releases that exclusively played the Circle during its heyday as a single screen house between the late 60s and the 1976 twinning were Paramount films. Among the Paramount releases: “Three Days of the Condor,” “Death Wish,” “Paint Your Wagon,” “Rosemary’s Baby,” “The Great Gatsby,” “Chinatown” and most notably the endless run of “Love Story.”

But quite a few non-Paramount films had exclusive runs at the Circle during that period, such as “Thoroughly Modern Millie” (Universal, and a reserved seat engagement roadshow), “Nicholas and Alexandra,” (Columbia; roadshow); “Patton” (Fox; roadshow); “The Way We Were” and “Emmanuelle” (both Columbia) and “At Long Last Love” (Fox). The last film I saw at the Circle prior to twinning was Universal’s “The Hindenburg” (and if memory serves, that engagement was in 70MM).

The holiday season of 1975 probably represented the last exclusive first runs of major studio releases at theaters in Newton/Brookline: the Circle had “The Hindenburg” and the newly opened GC Chestnut Hill had “Lucky Lady.” In later years, Sack/USA would continue to have the occasional first run exclusive (platform runs for no more than a few weeks before expanding to the suburbs) but I don’t recall that the Circle or Chestnut Hill were ever used for that purpose.

David Wodeyla
David Wodeyla on October 9, 2006 at 11:15 am

National Amusements is also known as Redstone Theatres, owned by Sumner Redstone. Their home office is in Dedham, and they only had suburban theatres, like Dedham, Woburn, Revere, etc. Nothing downtown Boston that I can think of.
Back in the day, Sumner would get in a helicopter, and fly over an area, pointing out locations to buy land to build theatres. That was the difference between him and Richard Smith. Smith didn’t believe in buying land, thus nearly all the GCC theatres were leased, located in Malls. The Redstone Theatres were close, but not actually in a Mall.

Ron Newman
Ron Newman on October 9, 2006 at 10:57 am

I can’t remember any other National Amusements theatres in Boston ever, besides the Circle and later the Allston. Maybe someone who lived here before 1975 can correct me.

IanJudge
IanJudge on October 7, 2006 at 9:54 am

FYI, Viacom and its subsidiaries like Paramount, plus CBS are both owned by… National Amusements, not the other way around.

Boywonder
Boywonder on October 7, 2006 at 7:47 am

Yes, I have been to the Circle recently and it does indeed look pretty good. It’s interesting to find out that this was once a single screen theater. Especially considering it’s location. But, I suppose the area may have dramatically changed over the years.

Makes sense that this was(is?) a Paramount house since I belive National Amusements was (is?) owned by Viacom at one point. I can’t keep up with all the corporate changes these days.

The small theaters in the back are not great, but they’re better than of the old Copley Place closets.

It this the last of National Amusement theaters in Boston now that the Allston Cinema is gone?

cookiecutter0356
cookiecutter0356 on September 5, 2006 at 2:14 pm

I was in Circle recently, and the place looks pretty good. They painted to lobby, and it looks like they did some work to the box office and the concession stand. Still not great, but it looks better then it has for a long time.

The theaters in the back cant have screens bigger then maybe 15 feet, but its still a nice little theater. Its a throwback in many ways, but I still like going to the Circle as it still has some charecter. The theaters arent all back to back in a long row, its not a cookie cutter multiplex, it has a rather quirky deisgn that I think makes it worth visiting.

tinydr
tinydr on May 22, 2006 at 7:31 pm

Wow, this is great information all around. Very impressive, folks!

I didn’t start going to the Circle until the late 70s, it’s really amazing to imagine back in the day. The major thing I remember about the Circle in my many years of going there was those awful green-clad chairs.

As an aside for I.M. Judge, I used to work @ the Coolidge back in the early 90s, and when we had Aladdin (don’t ask how and why we got that, I’m going to try to avoid airing the Coolidge’s extensive dirty laundry) we were also showing the Lesbian love drama “Claire of the Moon.” We were selling out both shows multiple times a day… those were amusing crowds.

One last point for the previous poster regarding the Chestnut Hill theater… Newton people don’t walk!

David Wodeyla
David Wodeyla on April 25, 2006 at 1:38 pm

The best part of the business was running the floor when the lobby would be packed waiting for the previous show to exit, the lines waiting until the crowd moved in to continue selling, filling most of the auditorium, then packing them into the balcony before continuing to fill the downstairs, then the making of “doubles”, and finally at the end of the day, cashing out and being “even”. Doing it four times a day on one screen and the same on a second was even better.

IanJudge
IanJudge on April 25, 2006 at 11:44 am

It’s funny to me you mention that dwodeyla, because this past weekend at my theater (Somerville) we hosted the Independent Film Festival of Boston, and several of their big shows were in our 900 seat house. The lines stretched around the entirety of three sides of the building for certain screenings, including two that filled the big house to near-capacity. I remember thinking “How are we going to seat this many people in time?” and yet, once it got moving, I would say that within 10 minutes, about 700 people had taken their seats. Then I thought “Imagine doing this three or four times a day every weekend like in the old days!”.

There is truly nothing like seeing a movie with over 500-1000 people in the room – it is (to me) part of what makes going to ‘the show’ fun. It is too bad more multiplex theaters do not have one or two ‘grand/main’ theaters to showcase certain films in that epic way of old. Maybe not every movie needs the huge screen and surround sound or even a screen curtain, particularly ‘small’ films, but to see a deserving film in such a manner would impress even the most non-interested moviegoer.

David Wodeyla
David Wodeyla on April 25, 2006 at 10:57 am

Attending a movie at nearly any Boston area theatre, even in the shopping centers, was a grand experience through the 1950’s and even into the ‘60s. In those days, the family “got dressed up” to go, whether it Sound of Music, Doctor Zhivago, or any number of blockbuster features, which people flocked to see in the large auditoriums with big screens. When was the last time you saw a line around the block buying tickets to anything? And the lines moved faster too, with 1000 seat auditoriums filling up in a matter of 20 minutes or so.

Ron Newman
Ron Newman on April 25, 2006 at 6:43 am

A few single screens still operate in the Boston area, though attending a movie at one is no longer the grand experience you and others recall from the 1940s. Here are the survivors I know of:

Brattle Theatre, Cambridge
Studio Cinema, Belmont
Loring Hall, Hingham
Stoughton Cinema Pub
Cabot Street Cinema, Beverly
Newburyport Screening Room

bliberman
bliberman on April 22, 2006 at 11:12 am

My first memories of the Cleveland Circle, as it was called when I lived nearby (it was officially in Brighton, by the way) were as a 7-year old. That would be 1948.

It was a ten minute walk from where I lived, so I saw plenty of movies there. I think a ticket cost 11 cents for children, 15 or 20 for adults. Imagine â€" pricing in pennies!

I don’t know when it was built, but I would guess shortly after WWII, but certainly not as late as the 50’s as some have suggested here.

It had a spacious outer lobby where the ticket seller was. And a great big candy stand in a big, carpeted inner lobby. There was also a not-so-large balcony which was always available (I think).

They did indeed show a couple of cartoons, a newsreel and sometimes another short, often a travelogue. But previews? Only two, for whatever was coming next! Yes, in addition to the above, it was always a double feature.

The Circle was a first-run second-run theatre back then. In other words, very soon after a picture closed its run downtown it would play the Circle, one of less than a handful throughout the city. The others â€" like the Egyptian, on the other side of Brighton (near Allston) would be third run houses.

The auditorium had modern comfortable push-back seats and there was a curtain in front of the screen, which was dramatically opened and closed between portions of the program.

I can’t fathom how it is that one of the first pictures I remember seeing there was “Joan of Arc”, starring Ingrid Bergman, in 1948. When I was 7? And without my mother? I cried my eyes out when she was burned at the stake. (Maybe I saw it later in re-issue.) You can see it on DVD now â€" quite a spectacle. By 1953 there were no more double features and one of my great all-time memories is going with my pals to see “Stalag 17” every day twice a day for the entire week of our Easter vacation that year. We saw it fourteen times! And we knew every line by heart.

It really is a shame that there are so few single screen theatres any more. Going to the movies at a single screen theatre always seemed to be more of an occasion.

FormerTheatreGuy
FormerTheatreGuy on August 28, 2005 at 7:27 pm

To answer a couple of previous questions – The Circle was not originally owned by Redstone/National Amusements/Showcase nor was it the first Showcase theatre, but when he purchased the Circle it became his first INDOOR theatre. (Redstone/Showcase owned LOTS of drive-ins at the time.) After the main theatre was twinned, cinema #3 (upstairs) was added. A big misconception is that cinemas 4-7 (the ones in the back, and yes, they are the 4 WORST places to see a movie) were all added at the same time. They were not. Originally (Late 70’s/Early 80’s) there were only two theatres back there, and they were quite nice – both with over 200 seats and wide (30+) feet screens. Each one was split in two (THE HORROR!) in 1990.

ErikH
ErikH on June 22, 2005 at 6:29 am

My hunch is that the Globe writer was referring to developments such as stadium seating and digital projection as “modern amenities” and not to the architecture.

The original single screen auditorium was twinned in 1976 (the first attraction at one of the twinned screens was “Marathon Man”) and the screens in the back followed a few years later. The first time I saw a film in one of those auditoriums in the back was the reissue of “Fiddler on the Roof” which I think was in 1978 or 1979.

David Wodeyla
David Wodeyla on June 22, 2005 at 5:57 am

I guess the next question is what building was called the Cleveland Circle Cinema in 1962? Unless 1965 marked the year Redstone purchased it from ATC and renovated it. It certainly has a late 1950’s look about it, and as for modern amenities, I’d question the writer’s priorities. It was a gorgeous modern building, rivaling anything else built in the early sixties. Certainly not the shoebox-like buildings that GCC was putting up at the time.
The only problem was the addition of four tiny screens in the back of the main building, which I think may have been done in the 1970s.

ErikH
ErikH on June 22, 2005 at 5:32 am

Regarding the date of the opening of the Circle.

From today’s Boston Globe (excerpt from an article on the Loews/AMC merger):

The seven-screen Circle Theater at Cleveland Circle, owned by National Amusements' Showcase Cinemas of Dedham, was built in 1965 and has relatively few modern amenities.

David Wodeyla
David Wodeyla on May 4, 2005 at 5:39 pm

Was the Circle the first Showcase theatre? If not, do you know what was? I’m enjoying your anecdotes regarding the various Boston area theatres and hope you’ll keep us informed with more.

modernbeacon
modernbeacon on May 4, 2005 at 3:16 pm

This was the “newest” of the ATC Theatres. ATC President was Sam Pinanski, who came from M&P and previously NETOCO (Jacob Lourie’s). He was determined to have his own chain of theatres patched together from the old M&P, New England Theatres, NETOCO, Paramount Publix, etc. My understanding is he sold the theatre to Redstone. To the ATC staff the inside joke was ATC meant “Another Theatre Closed”.

tomovieboy70
tomovieboy70 on April 22, 2005 at 5:16 pm

I saw many films here when I was in college at Boston University in the 1970s. The main auditorium was great, but the smaller ones were awfully narrow. I’ll never forget seeing a midnight show of “Can’t Stop the Music” in 1979 and watching half the audience walk out and the other half laugh themselves silly (I was part of the latter group). Fun memories.

David Wodeyla
David Wodeyla on March 19, 2005 at 7:33 pm

At the end of July, 1961, the Cleveland Circle was advertised in the Boston Traveler as being an ATC or American Theatres Corp. Theatre which also owned the Waltham Embassy, and in downtown Boston, the Pilgrim and Mayflower Theatres, as well as several other suburban theatres.

Ron Newman
Ron Newman on March 11, 2005 at 11:54 am

From the Brookline TAB newspaper, February 17, 2005:

Mice run circles around cinema

Call it the House of Mouse, or more appropriately, mice, because it’s a nickname that fits, according to patrons of the Cleveland Circle Cinema.

Attracted by more than just cheesy movies, the pocket-sized rodents have overrun the theater on at least two occasions in a three-month span.

The theater was “infested with mice … they were everywhere,” according to a complaint fielded by the Brookline Health Department last summer.

A trio of customers brought the issue to the attention of cinema employees in August and “were told the company knew about the problem, but there was nothing they could do about it,” according to Health Department reports.

Three months later, a similar complaint was filed charging that “mice [were] running throughout the theater.” Most customers who had gathered for a screening left, but those who stayed “had to put their feet up on the back[s] of chairs,” according to the complaint.

Pat Maloney, Brookline’s chief of environmental health, said movie theaters face some special set of circumstances when it comes to keeping mice at bay.

“Cinemas in general have a more challenging environment because … it’s common that persons will discard food items on the floor in a movie theater,” said Maloney. Food on any floor, especially if it isn’t cleaned promptly and completely, will attract mice.

“That creates a greater challenge than you might find in a restaurant, for example, because in restaurants, people don’t discard their food on the floor,” Maloney added.

Maloney is involved in the cinema’s health inspections, because the facility falls inside the Brookline border. Its parking lot, however, is in Brighton.

 Maloney noted that his department had not fielded any complaints about mice in the theater since the new year, and a follow-up inspection on Jan. 10 had “satisfied” Maloney and his department that the theater has continued to take appropriate preventative action.

Ron Newman
Ron Newman on March 11, 2005 at 11:41 am

This is someone’s memory of going to elementary and junior high school in Newton in the 1950s. She mentions “Saturdays at the Circle Theatre watching previews of coming attractions, The World in Review, 3 cartoons and 2 feature films”.

Is it possible that the current theatre replaced an earlier one with the same name?