RKO Keith's Theatre

135-35 Northern Boulevard,
Flushing, NY 11354

Unfavorite 46 people favorited this theater

Showing 101 - 125 of 1,241 comments

BobbyS
BobbyS on October 5, 2012 at 8:11 am

Is this theater still standing? Or has the wrecking ball begun to swing?

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on July 29, 2012 at 6:31 am

On this day 80 years ago

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on July 2, 2012 at 10:14 am

Thanks for that link, Tinseltoes! The story about how that “prison” double bill was promoted in Flushing is even more illuminating than the photo — though “IN PERSON – SING WITH ‘BERNIE’ AT THE MIGHTY ORGAN” on the marquee gives another sense of the flavor of the times.

BobbyS
BobbyS on June 22, 2012 at 9:53 pm

Tinseltoes and SWC and Jeffrey1955 keep the RKO Keiths “alive” and thanks to you there is a glimmer of hope however slight…One seat remains, how sad after thousands were there! Milk glass white with hang on lettering started in the 40’s here in Chicago and most of the big houses here had it installed by 1945.

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on June 19, 2012 at 8:38 pm

Nice find Tinseltoes, always wondered what the source of that photo was. BTW not all the seats were replaced apparently some of the cast iron originals were left in the balcony. Ironically of the 2,971 seats in the RKO only one remains – the original style – having been tossed from the balcony and caught in plaster backing structure, where it has hung for 26 years:

robboehm
robboehm on June 19, 2012 at 6:44 pm

I would doubt it. By 1951 that type of lettering was no longer used. The background was white opaque glass and the raised letters affixed on tracks.

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on June 19, 2012 at 2:28 pm

So apparently, the massive marquee that covered the original curved one was a part of the “thorough modernization” of 1951?

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on June 9, 2012 at 7:40 pm


What is proposed for the RKO Keith’s is even more of a tragedy for Flushing than what has been done so far.

BobbyS
BobbyS on June 8, 2012 at 10:49 pm

These photos are just amazing!! So much beauty remains. It makes you sick to think this could all be gone in a matter of months.

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on June 8, 2012 at 6:52 pm


Wall fixture in the 784 square foot Men’s Smoking Room. This and most of the theatre would be demolished to make way for a proposed apartment building that would have 357 units with an average area of 787 square feet.

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on June 6, 2012 at 5:04 pm

The “bulldozed” West stairway from the promenade

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on May 20, 2012 at 7:50 am

Oops! There goes another chunk of landmark.

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on May 16, 2012 at 9:11 pm

The scrupulously maintained landmark

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on May 13, 2012 at 8:19 am


http://www.queenstribune.com/staff/index.shtml

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on May 12, 2012 at 11:02 pm

At least the Tribune seems to have some grasp of the facts, unlike the Courier. Ross Barkan actually notes that the theater has fallen into “disrepair” instead of acting like it no longer exists, acknowledges the efforts of preservationists, and never even mentions that PR crap about “preserving” the lobby. A far cry from the pathetic “journalism” of Melissa Chan — who never bothered to respond.

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on May 9, 2012 at 5:07 pm

I just posted a scathing comment to that Queens Courier story. Let’s see what Melissa Chan has to say in reply!

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on March 14, 2012 at 3:42 pm

It’s not that Thomas Huang didn’t try to destroy the theatre, it’s just that he was just so cheap he hired incompetent day laborers to do the job using hand held hammers. It is thanks to this method of “demolition” that so much of the theatre survives to this day.

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on March 14, 2012 at 3:35 pm

Time for another photo of the gutted and worthless

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on March 14, 2012 at 11:31 am

That is a wonderfully succinct summation of everything that is wrong with this project.

As for the machinations surrounding whether investment partners have or have not been found — it sure sounds like Fred Wilpon and the Mets are involved! Must be the water in Queens…

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on March 14, 2012 at 9:48 am

The myth that there is nothing of value left in the theatre ignores the facts. The urbanremainschicago.com site is currently marketing portions of Chicago’s 1931 Nortown Theatre, demolished in June 2007. Examples include frieze panels of 31" x 21" offered for $750, small mask sculptures offered for $1,850 and other decorative geometry plaster sections are sold for $460. While the 82,439 sq ft Flushing RKO Keith’s Theatre has deliberate damage to interior walls, it also has on the order of 10,000 sq. ft. of hand sculpted plaster and relief panels, mostly extant, in excellent to repairable condition in the auditorium. A complete valuation has never been done, if parted out it could be worth millions. Consider that they were designed by America’s foremost show palace architect and done by skilled craftsman brought over from Scotland. The presence of these artifacts has been substantiated with numerous recent photographs. The reinforced concrete balcony, steel frame structure, foundation and immaculate exterior brick work all remain intact. It is the one of last surviving atmospheric theatres in the country and is part of the cultural heritage of NYC and its development. The Flushing community, with its well documented congestion in the downtown area and glut of zoning variance properties, many unoccupied for years, is not well served with the addition 357 units on a street that has NYC’s second highest vehicular traffic, after Times Square, configured as a tower directly under the LaGuardia airport landing approach.

LuisV
LuisV on March 14, 2012 at 8:01 am

Hmmm, we’ll see. It’s a soap Opera indeed!

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on March 14, 2012 at 7:47 am

He could simply be buying time with a cryptic statement that some unnamed financial partner has been secured for the project. If there is no partner and the question comes up again in a few months, he might simply explain that the partner eventually backed out of the deal – again, unnamed. At some point, they’ll either have to play or fold. But until their hand is forced, they can string everyone along with vague lies and exaggerations for quite a while. Basic everyday politics.

BobbyS
BobbyS on March 14, 2012 at 7:26 am

Why not LuisV? Politicians do all the time…

LuisV
LuisV on March 14, 2012 at 5:30 am

I would agree except that lying about finding a partner and getting exposed for it will make it worse so (unless I’m missing something) I don’t buy it.