RKO Keith's Theatre

135-35 Northern Boulevard,
Flushing, NY 11354

Unfavorite 45 people favorited this theater

Showing 101 - 125 of 1,224 comments

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on March 14, 2012 at 3:42 pm

It’s not that Thomas Huang didn’t try to destroy the theatre, it’s just that he was just so cheap he hired incompetent day laborers to do the job using hand held hammers. It is thanks to this method of “demolition” that so much of the theatre survives to this day.

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on March 14, 2012 at 3:35 pm

Time for another photo of the gutted and worthless

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on March 14, 2012 at 11:31 am

That is a wonderfully succinct summation of everything that is wrong with this project.

As for the machinations surrounding whether investment partners have or have not been found — it sure sounds like Fred Wilpon and the Mets are involved! Must be the water in Queens…

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on March 14, 2012 at 9:48 am

The myth that there is nothing of value left in the theatre ignores the facts. The urbanremainschicago.com site is currently marketing portions of Chicago’s 1931 Nortown Theatre, demolished in June 2007. Examples include frieze panels of 31" x 21" offered for $750, small mask sculptures offered for $1,850 and other decorative geometry plaster sections are sold for $460. While the 82,439 sq ft Flushing RKO Keith’s Theatre has deliberate damage to interior walls, it also has on the order of 10,000 sq. ft. of hand sculpted plaster and relief panels, mostly extant, in excellent to repairable condition in the auditorium. A complete valuation has never been done, if parted out it could be worth millions. Consider that they were designed by America’s foremost show palace architect and done by skilled craftsman brought over from Scotland. The presence of these artifacts has been substantiated with numerous recent photographs. The reinforced concrete balcony, steel frame structure, foundation and immaculate exterior brick work all remain intact. It is the one of last surviving atmospheric theatres in the country and is part of the cultural heritage of NYC and its development. The Flushing community, with its well documented congestion in the downtown area and glut of zoning variance properties, many unoccupied for years, is not well served with the addition 357 units on a street that has NYC’s second highest vehicular traffic, after Times Square, configured as a tower directly under the LaGuardia airport landing approach.

LuisV
LuisV on March 14, 2012 at 8:01 am

Hmmm, we’ll see. It’s a soap Opera indeed!

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on March 14, 2012 at 7:47 am

He could simply be buying time with a cryptic statement that some unnamed financial partner has been secured for the project. If there is no partner and the question comes up again in a few months, he might simply explain that the partner eventually backed out of the deal – again, unnamed. At some point, they’ll either have to play or fold. But until their hand is forced, they can string everyone along with vague lies and exaggerations for quite a while. Basic everyday politics.

BobbyS
BobbyS on March 14, 2012 at 7:26 am

Why not LuisV? Politicians do all the time…

LuisV
LuisV on March 14, 2012 at 5:30 am

I would agree except that lying about finding a partner and getting exposed for it will make it worse so (unless I’m missing something) I don’t buy it.

edtracey
edtracey on March 13, 2012 at 2:14 pm

Mike Nussbaum brokered the deal for Thompson when he bought the theater. The same Nussbaum who was Donald Manes' campaign manager and was convicted of soliciting bribes. So yes, I would think saving face is a big deal for him.

LuisV
LuisV on March 13, 2012 at 1:58 pm

Hmmm….How does one “save face” by lying about finding a partner? Wouldn’t that be quickly exposed and make you look even more foolish? Of course, I don’t know this developer so he could just be not be very bright. :–)

edtracey
edtracey on March 13, 2012 at 1:38 pm

According to another reporter from the local rags, Michael Nussbaum is only trying to save face, and that there are actually no interested investors/financiers. They also mentioned that Newmark Frank will most likely take the listing. I have a call into them to conifrm.

LuisV
LuisV on March 13, 2012 at 1:05 pm

Indeed, the developer has found a partner, though the plan still includes “saving” a restored Lobby.

Matt Lambros
Matt Lambros on March 13, 2012 at 8:55 am

Looks like the rumors the Keith’s was for sale again were only rumors….

RKO Keith’s theater developer Patrick Thompson finds financial partner

BobbyS
BobbyS on March 9, 2012 at 6:42 pm

A soap opera couln’t more interesting than the perils of the Keith’s. More twists & turns coming…..

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on March 9, 2012 at 10:49 am

The saga continues…

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on March 9, 2012 at 10:42 am

Thanks for the heads-up! Found it in the Queens Chronicle:

Posted: Thursday, March 8, 2012 5:22 pm by Liz Rhoades Rumors are flying around Flushing that the latest owner of the RKO Keith’s Theatre has put the property on the market. The star-crossed plan for 357 apartment units, 360 underground parking spaces and retail space seems to be on hold once again — but nothing could immediately be confirmed. The latest owner, Patrick Thompson, a Manhattan developer, bought the Northern Boulevard property in 2010 for $20 million. Flushing officials say they’ve heard that it’s been on the market for about a month. Thompson even got a variance to amend the 2005 one, adding additional apartments and parking. The plan also calls for a senior center and retention of the landmarked lobby and ticket booth. Attempts to reach Thompson were not successful. The theater was built in 1928 and closed in 1987 after it was bought by Thomas Huang, who wanted to convert it into a shopping mall. When his plans were thwarted by the city’s Landmarks Preservation Commission, Huang sat on the property and allowed it to deteriorate and partially bulldozed one of the landmarked staircases. Huang sold the property to a Brooklyn developer in 2002, who ran out of money and sold the Keith’s to Thompson.

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on March 9, 2012 at 9:53 am

I am hesitant to show overall photos because the reaction is “look at the destruction” as opposed to “look 90% of the theatre is still there and in salvageable condition” You can see the space above the ceiling where undocumented workers hired by the first developer could climb into and hammer down sections. The “show me the money” argument against restoring the theatre applies just as easily to developers who want to build a mixed use tower. It appears the RKO is back on the market and yet another developer makes an exit leaving behind the mess they created.

BobbyS
BobbyS on March 8, 2012 at 7:29 pm

SWC, What an erie, haunting wonderful picture! It still has magic through all these years…One would think the neighborhood would rally around this faded showplace. Maybe 30 years ago they might have when there was more money around and people appreciated beauty……

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on March 8, 2012 at 6:21 pm

http://www.qchron.com/editions/north/northern-queens-flushing-rko-keith-s-for-sale-again/article_21899650-696d-11e1-ae59-001871e3ce6c.html?fb_ref=.T1lSS2Nfzdg.like&fb_source=profile_oneline


The RKO: Heart of Darkness

rlinders
rlinders on February 26, 2012 at 9:06 pm

Is it possible to go inside the theater?

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on February 21, 2012 at 11:05 pm

A detail from the backstage VIP dressing room

layla2barb
layla2barb on February 19, 2012 at 9:22 am

Can’t wait to see some more pix!

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on February 4, 2012 at 8:41 pm

It’s gutted I tell you

techman707
techman707 on February 4, 2012 at 7:34 pm

lfreimauer – Maybe you should check out this page on

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/220242754654213/223364514342037/

They intend to restore this great movie palace. I only wish I could live to see it. In the early 1950’s, its spendor could match ANY theatre in NYC. Of course also in Queens, Loews Valencia came pretty damn close.

lfreimauer
lfreimauer on January 27, 2012 at 7:37 am

Another lost cause here!