Loew's Jersey Theatre

54 Journal Square,
Jersey City, NJ 07306

Unfavorite 89 people favorited this theater

Showing 1,326 - 1,350 of 1,458 comments

beardbear31 on February 23, 2005 at 9:44 pm

Thank you Divinity, that always puzzled me….I am speachless now about that….

Divinity on February 22, 2005 at 12:52 am

People Assumed that the crew removing the dragon were construction workers that might have been repairing the building Beardbear31. No one would suspect that theives would have done this in broad daylight at the city’s third largest shopping district.

YMike on February 17, 2005 at 11:04 am

Great! Can’t wait to see it.

mdvoskin on February 14, 2005 at 12:40 pm

If the studio sends the print of Ben Hur I expect they are going to send, the sound will be Dolby Stereo. GWTW will be the restored print from a few years ago, the only one currently distribution.

Loews Jersey Projection Staff

YMike on February 13, 2005 at 8:58 pm

Hope they show the recently restored print of GWTW. Should look great on that big screen.

beardbear31 on February 13, 2005 at 8:33 pm

Great link, TC! Looking at those photos of them raising the restored dragon with a crane, makes me wonder how someone could have stolen the dragon from the Loew’s Paradise clock…..

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on February 13, 2005 at 6:46 am

“Ben-Hur” at the Loew’s Jersey on March 5th – 44 years after I first saw it there when I was 6 years old. I was hoping this day would come someday.

Vito on February 13, 2005 at 4:10 am

Mitchell, which sound formats will be used for “Ben Hur” and “GWTW?

mdvoskin on February 12, 2005 at 11:47 am

The Loews Jersey’s next film weekend will be March 4-6, and is now on-line.


Loews Jersey Projection Staff

teecee on February 11, 2005 at 11:03 am

Interesting photos taken during exterior renovation, courtesy of The Jersey Journal at this link:

VincentParisi on February 3, 2005 at 7:42 am

Thanks for your response. I look forward to your next program.

mdvoskin on February 3, 2005 at 6:29 am

Hopefully if all goes well, you will see 70mm at the Loews next fall. As to a larger screen, it probably won’t happen since the theatre is also used for live performances. The current screen is the largest that can fit into the arch, and going outside the arch would make it impossible to raise the screen up into the stage loft. 60 to 70 foot portable screens are not really a viable option.

Loews Jersey Projection Staff

VincentParisi on February 3, 2005 at 6:00 am

But an image of 2.35:1 has a screen size distinctly smaller than a 1:33 or 1:85 with the type of proscenium the Loew’s has.

Shade on February 2, 2005 at 4:12 pm

I’m sure they would be into that, but I think they’d be happier if someone else was coordinating all the craziness with having a portable screen. They have a 50 x 25 now. Sure it’s not the Cinerama Dome’s 86-footer, but it’s not exactly small…

VincentParisi on February 2, 2005 at 4:05 pm

OK so let’s say I’ve died and gone to heaven.
This would be the Loew’s presenting 70mm. However they install a screen of 60 to 70 ft for just such a purpose.
The Loews is great for Vistavision(how about Vertigo, Funny Face or Strategic Air Command?) But cinemascope in that huge place is a disappointment as screen size is reduced by a third to a half.
Anyway if the people at the Loew’s(and though I don’t know you I love you all)are interested I’m for starting a NY wide-screen club and working to find a way to make a portable screen for such events. Having no expertise in such matters I don’t know if this is even doable. Might the Loew’s be interested in something like this? Any comments?

Butch on February 1, 2005 at 10:06 am

I was there for the last show Saturday when an announcement was made that a closing theater in Washington would be donating two 70MM projectors to the Jersey. Hopefully this may encourage a 70MM festival in the future.

gabedellafave on February 1, 2005 at 9:24 am

I was also there on Saturday, but only for the first film. Nice presentation! I highly recommend this venue to anyone who cares about seeing classic films in their original environment. The theatre itself will knock your socks off. It is an amazing sight to see. Not only is it huge and ornate, but it is largely intact — a definite time warp to c. 1929.

YMike on February 1, 2005 at 5:18 am

Was there Saturday. Nice prints on both films.

VincentParisi on January 11, 2005 at 6:30 am

I can’t believe it. Finally somebody there who can program films suitable for a movie palace. Sorry for the sarcasm guys but it’s been too long. Keep up the good work!

YMike on January 11, 2005 at 5:16 am

They are showing the 1940 “Thief Of Bagdad” as well as “The Adventures Of Robin Hood” on Jan.29. Hope they get nice prints. Both films should look great on a big screen.

bruceanthony on December 31, 2004 at 11:12 am

I think a good rotation of quality films from 1930’s,1940’s,1950,s,1960’s,and films after 1970 would attract a large audience. A studio tribute to M-G-M during its 80th birthday would tie in Loew’s Jersey’s historical past.Maybe at the end of the tribute a new M-G-M film such as “Be Cool” with John Travolta and Uma Thurman could be premiered or shown. Maybe someone could contact MGM and gain some publicity for the Loew’s-MGM connection as well as promoting there new film. Its ironic that MGM will soon be part of Sony and at one time Sony ownded a 50% interest in Loew’s theatres.brucec

RobertR on December 10, 2004 at 11:58 am

I’m suprised they would only run My Fair Lady on a Friday night and not both nights. What kind of stereo equiptment is the theatre using right now?

VincentParisi on December 10, 2004 at 11:37 am

Having enjoyed your programs enormously and finding the individual you are refering to always a pleasure to speak with and a charming host in his introductions one can only regret any misunderstandings the two of you have had as your previous relationship did the theater proud.

VincentParisi on December 10, 2004 at 9:48 am

What they are doing now makes no sense to me. They want to contiue to show classic films at the Loew’s. Yet they show films that are R rated or innapropriate for the family or they show films that as great as they are really need a rest. Am I missing something?

JimRankin on December 10, 2004 at 9:39 am

Poor Bob Furmanek; he has noticed what I have: that the theares are often far sweeter than the people who own and run them.