RKO Keith's Theatre

135-35 Northern Boulevard,
Flushing, NY 11354

Unfavorite 48 people favorited this theater

Showing 201 - 225 of 1,291 comments

SWCphotography on January 19, 2012 at 10:06 pm

Character in the balcony

SWCphotography on January 19, 2012 at 8:25 am

Thanks Ed, you have been a long supporter on this board. Yes Matt’s work is excellent and he had to work very hard to secure those images. What you are confronted with in photographing this theatre may not be fully appreciated, truly like slipping into darkness. This image from backstage may give you an idea:

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on January 19, 2012 at 7:40 am

SWC… many thanks for the photos. I think they serve a vital purpose in the name of theater preservation and historical appreciation. I also applaud Matt Lambros' terrific work on his blog After The Final Curtain, but he casts a much wider net than you do – traveling around the country as he does to photograph his many subjects.

Your detailed photographic journal of the Keith’s is a wonderful accomplishment – particularly considering the physical conditions that exist within its dilapidated shell. I think it’s very important that every surviving detail of this architectural gem be documented and catalogued, while they still remain. In the best case scenario, this series of images would spur a true restoration of the Keith’s and return to its highest and best utility. And in the worst case, we would at least be left with vivid reminders of what was lost.

As for posting them in the comment section… Sure, this might bend the rules a bit, but as long as the images don’t distort the presentation of the page (as some clumsily embedded pics can do), I see no harm nor foul.

SWCphotography on January 19, 2012 at 6:55 am

These photos are not embedded images but self hosted links per the board rules.

SWCphotography on January 18, 2012 at 1:40 pm

You can help the FB effort “Save the Flushing RKO Keith’s” a new photo is published every day, 161 so far.

SWCphotography on January 18, 2012 at 1:30 pm

Thanks Dave, I got into the theatre through strictly legal means – the front door was open and the Daily News, by coincidence published that the public must be provided with access to declared landmarks at the same time. All I read in the local publications is how a developer will save the theatre going as far as calling it a “rebirth” by demolishing the theatre and saving a 66' x 38' patch of the foyer to make it the entrance to a high density 357 unit market rate rental with an average apartment size of 786 sq ft. Now the rhetoric has it that the theatre is gutted, so the assumption is that it can never be restored and that there is nothing of value, art or architecture left. The public has been locked out for 26 years so it can’t be doubted. There are almost no photographs of the interior in any detail from 1929 to the present. When the few photos that are contemporary surface they are usually far field and reinforce the assumption of a gutted unsalvageable condition. To do a true high definition survey of the theatre is not a simple matter. Much of the damage was done with a hand held hammer at arm’s length (the hammers are still there scattered around the theatre) so surviving detail is usually at a range of 12-50' away, unless you have a cherry picker and excellent lighting it is unlikely. The theatre is pitch black; you cannot see your hand in front of your face in most areas nonetheless focus. All of the photos I post are self hosted, for the curious you can track down the source and view in close up far beyond what can be copied on this server, many are extreme blow ups to capture the whole point that what survives is of value. Adding them with a message and caption is a continuing reminder that the theatre is relevant and that what you have been hearing about the RKO is what suits the developer:

bazookadave on January 18, 2012 at 12:30 pm

SWC please continue posting photos. The close-ups of the decorative elements are important. Maybe some day building theatres like this will become popular again and these photos will give designers in the future a guideline to re-creating the palaces. Anything is possible. Can you get me in there?? :)

BobbyS on January 18, 2012 at 2:32 am

“Tomorrow is another day”….

SWCphotography on January 17, 2012 at 9:08 pm

“Frankly my dear I don’t give a damn”

Gamble on January 17, 2012 at 4:52 pm

Lol i agree with James on this one.

Jeffrey1955 on January 17, 2012 at 4:18 pm

JamesD, what I meant to say was, “WE’RE not supposed to post personal attacks.” That’s why there’s nothing more I can say to you, except please go be a dick somewhere else.

BobbyS on January 17, 2012 at 1:21 pm

Many thanks again SWC for taking the time to enter the theater and posting the photos for us to enjoy..as for JamesD we are waiting for yours….

JamesD on January 17, 2012 at 12:26 pm

That’s not a personal attack at all. I’m just saying what I’m seeing in his images. There’s a lot of nice architectural details left in the Keith’s theater, but you can’t really make them out in these images. Maybe you should learn more photography terms Jeffrey.

Jeffrey1955 on January 17, 2012 at 12:20 pm

Noisy? Crooked? Out of focus? What the heck are you talking about? JamesD, whoever you are, we’re not supposed to post personal attacks…so there’s nothing more I can say to you. Have a nice day!

layla2barb on January 17, 2012 at 10:25 am

I don’t care where they are posted as long as I get to see them. As far as quality you could always crawl around in there and show us what you got. Keep on clicking SWC.

JamesD on January 17, 2012 at 9:35 am

I appreciate that SWC is documenting the theater, but he’s a pretty terrible photographer. All the images are noisy, crooked, and some are out of focus. Also, why are you posting these in the comments section? There is an area for posting photographs but you seem to ignore that.

BobbyS on January 15, 2012 at 10:17 pm

SWC,It is so true what you write and a big thank you for letting us see it from your eyes..

SWCphotography on January 15, 2012 at 9:37 pm

Thanks all! Trust me on this, what I have posted here is only a hint of what remains to this day. There are two ways of looking at it: The level of destruction or the extent of survival. If this theatre goes down it will never be replaced by an equal even in its current condition.

NativeForestHiller on January 15, 2012 at 6:29 pm

I agree. SWC deserves an award for his prominent role in documenting and publicizing this theater. We have proof of the great extent of architectural details in the auditorium, lounges, & other areas, which remain by the foremost theater architect Thomas W. Lamb. Don’t believe anything about what the politicians & developer(s) say.

Jeffrey1955 on January 15, 2012 at 6:25 pm

SWC really has done an incredible job of singlehandedly documenting the Keith’s architectural details. He deserves an award, or something.

layla2barb on January 15, 2012 at 2:14 pm

Your photos are so beautiful and haunting. I am always looking at them. I’m so sad at what has happened to this theatre but glad we will all have beautiful documentation of the remains. I hope someday you could publish a book of all these photos. I had to leave Queens when I was 13 in the 60’s but remember this wonderful theatre. Thank you for your contribution!

SWCphotography on January 5, 2012 at 4:50 am

A knowing face looks out over the East balcony:

SWCphotography on November 27, 2011 at 12:41 am

The dollars and cents value of surviving artwork:

SWCphotography on November 18, 2011 at 8:28 pm

Gutted and fit for demolition, or is it a failure to look beyond the rubble on the floor: A face in the orchestra