SIFF Cinema Downtown

2100 4th Avenue,
Seattle, WA 98121

Unfavorite 48 people favorited this theater

Showing 101 - 125 of 273 comments

paulnelson
paulnelson on July 18, 2012 at 2:48 am

I saw 2001 here in the 60’s. Great experience. Also Bladerunner in a Cinerama style presentation with a special lense on the projector and it looked like authentic Cinerama. That was the best experience. Years ago too.

Giles
Giles on May 4, 2012 at 6:58 pm

did anyone see ‘Ghostbusters’?? I really want to know if the 70mm print looked any better than the craptastic bluray edition.

CSWalczak
CSWalczak on April 23, 2012 at 8:00 pm

You are not the only one who thinks so!

CSWalczak
CSWalczak on April 20, 2012 at 10:39 pm

I asked about the sound via email to the staff at the Seattle Cinerama; their reply indicated that sound is six channel Digital Theater Sound (DTS).

Giles
Giles on April 20, 2012 at 10:18 pm

wouldn’t the 70mm have the superior soundtrack five across sound (+ mono surrounds), does the ‘digital’ version retain this? (I doubt it)

CSWalczak
CSWalczak on April 20, 2012 at 5:13 am

And, not only is this theater getting this new print pf “2001” for this sci-fi festival (which is planned now to be an annual event), but Warner’s is providing it to the Seattle Cinerama on a permanent loan basis according to this article.

Chris Utley
Chris Utley on April 14, 2012 at 5:19 pm

Paul Allen and his management team are continously making a mockery out of ArcLight/Pacific/Decurion. Seattle gets a new 70MM 2001 print while The Dome gets a 1 time only “digital” one. Shame.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on April 13, 2012 at 2:31 pm

Thanks for the info, CSWalczak!

CSWalczak
CSWalczak on April 12, 2012 at 8:40 pm

The announcement does not make clear if these showings will be on the theater’s Cinerama strip screen or not. Last September, during the Seattle Cinerama’s wide screen festival, all of the films shown were on the magnificent Cinerama screen, but given that some of the films in this upcoming series are in 35mm, I am guessing that the strip screen won’t be used this time around.

According to Martin Hart’s Widescreen Museum website, only films shot in Ultra Panavision 70 were rectified for Cinerama screenings; films such as “2001” which were in Super Panavison 70 were not. So this new print should be comparable to original roadshow screenings, except that I would bet in has a digital soundtrack instead of the original magnetic tracks.

A very large, slightly curved screen is normally used at the Seattle Cinerama; the Cinerama strip screen is behind it and I have read that it takes a day or two to get the Cinerama screen ready for use. Some previous showings of “2001” at the Seattle Cinerama over the last few years have been on the regular screen.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on April 12, 2012 at 7:56 pm

Damn! A new 70mm print of “2001: A Space Odyssey” on that giant Cinerama screen! Did they strike a custom print for this? One that is suitable for exhibition on the curve without distortion? Or is it an un-rectified print that can be exhibited on any regular sheet? This theater only has the Cinerama screen installed, is that correct? Or does it also have a standard screen for non-Cinerama bookings?

CSWalczak
CSWalczak on April 12, 2012 at 3:58 am

The Cinerama will be hosting a classic science fiction film festival from April 19 through May 2, 2012. Five titles will be in 70mm, including a new print of “2001”. Details and schedule here: View link

RogerA
RogerA on April 12, 2012 at 12:53 am

They spent all that money and installed those fake Todd-AO machines. What a waste of time and money. They need to install some real 2 motor Todd-AO machines. There is a theater in Somerville Mass that was able to get a pair.

GregF
GregF on November 3, 2011 at 2:31 am

The Cinerama site said 8k. I know their FB page said 2K and I pointed out the difference. Oh well. It doesn’t matter now. It’s a done deal. Hope it works out better for the 75th.

Giles
Giles on October 22, 2011 at 3:34 am

@ GregF: The Cinerama’s facebook page denotes the projection at 2K. Why though Warner’s did not create a 4K DCP of ‘Ben Hur’ to take advantage of the film’s original 70mm photography is bewildering.

GregF
GregF on October 22, 2011 at 3:01 am

I dunno…they’re claiming an 8k showing on their site. Check it out.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on October 21, 2011 at 9:51 pm

I think I’d go back to Seattle just for Ryan’s Daughter. Doctor Zhivago was considered for this year’s festival, but ultimately rejected because it was shot in 35mm Panavision and then blown up to 70mm.

Gooper
Gooper on October 21, 2011 at 7:22 pm

Hats off to the Cinerama’s team! Anyone who would show the much-maligned ‘South Pacific’ in Todd-AO gets my applause (worth seeing/hearing for Alfred Newman’s music direction alone, let alone Shamroy’s psychedelic color carnival).

I saw ‘Grand Prix’ & ‘2001’ in original release here, life-changing, of course. And in revival, ‘Oklahoma’ (though I think the CinemaScope version is better in subtle ways). Presentation of pix like ‘Exorcist’, ‘Excalibur’ and ‘Barry Lyndon’ at the Cinerama always made you feel like their celluloid was twice as wide as it really was.

Hopefully, a future festival might showcase not only ‘Grand Prix’ but anything and everything in Ultra-Panavision 70, from ‘Raintree County’ to ‘Fall of the Roman Empire’ (the Forum scenes outdo anything in ‘Cleopatra’ by a mile), plus ‘Mad World’, ‘Hallelujah Trail’, etc. And what about ‘El Cid’, ‘King of Kings’, ‘Exodus’, ‘Dr. Z’ & ‘Ryan’s Daughter’?

Seeing the restored 1954 ‘A Star Is Born’ here in the 80s also proved that plain old CinemaScope looks pretty dandy, too. I’d also add ‘The Egyptian’ as a reason to make a pilgrimage, as well. (For CinemaScope presentation, the mega-screen was specially masked top and bottom with matte cloth for 2.55:1 a/r; the attention to detail was impeccable.)

I’m a realist though, acquiring worthy prints of these more obscure titles might be impossible.

PS: I saw ‘Ben-Hur’ in its ‘69 re-release, which played at the Paramount across town. Supposedly, like 'Gone/Wind’, it was in 70, but having worked at the Paramount in the 70s, and having examined the projectors, they were just Simplex 35mm – I had expected Norelco/Philips 35/70 hardware, but no…

markinthedark
markinthedark on October 14, 2011 at 10:42 pm

Re-linking to thread.

Giles
Giles on October 14, 2011 at 10:29 pm

I assumed they were referring to the 8K restoration of the film, current digital projector are not able to output at 8K, the highest (at the moment) is 4K. Given that the Cinerama has installed a Christie Solaria (4K) projector this should look amazing.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on October 14, 2011 at 10:22 pm

It was an 8K presentation, and looked like 70mm. It filled a 50-foot flat screen beautifully, at Alice Tully Hall, Lincoln Center.

Giles
Giles on October 14, 2011 at 9:53 pm

wasn’t the New York City Film Festival screening of ‘Ben Hur’ a 4K DLP digital presentation? or was it 35mm – I assumed it was the former.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on October 14, 2011 at 8:16 pm

Ben-Hur starts here next weekend. It’s a new digital restoration. I wonder if they’ll be using the curved 90-foot screen or the flat 70-foot one? I saw it in New York City a few weeks ago and it was quite spectacular.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on October 14, 2011 at 4:53 pm

That’s what I said after seeing The Sound of Music: I finally got to see it on a huge curved screen, under real Todd-AO conditions.

I posted some pictures this morning. What a surprise to see original costumes from Planet of the Apes on display in the lobby.

GregF
GregF on October 14, 2011 at 2:59 pm

I think the problem is with the inexperienced projectionists. 70mm has its own set of issues from 35mm (magnetic sound and such). Oh well…it looked great!

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on October 14, 2011 at 12:54 pm

Wow Greg – too bad that had to happen. The next time the Cinerama shows some generic 2011 release, the sound will probably be perfect. But when they show West Side Story and The Sound of Music, there are problems. What can you do?