AMC Norridge 6

4520 N. Harlem Avenue,
Norridge, IL 60706

Unfavorite 10 people favorited this theater

Showing 26 - 50 of 129 comments

DavidZornig on December 3, 2015 at 7:50 pm

This Trib article says it was and M&E 12 screen that closed in 2008. I can’t find another Norridge on CT, and I can’t imagine 22 screens at the same address.

R68Dtrain2500 on November 27, 2014 at 2:07 pm

I never thought that AMC just closed their Loews Norridge 10. If Classic Cinemas will bring this theater back to life that will be awesome. AMC Kerasotes 14 is a few miles east in Cicero.

whtesoxfan56 on November 3, 2014 at 12:43 pm

I never thought about that issue CSWalczak, but I bet you’re right that AMC put that in their leasing clause, as a condition of sale of this property. As for this theater, it’d be nice if Classic Cinemas were to bring this theater back to life, but who knows. They interestingly did take a chance and brought North Riverside Mall 6 back to life, despite the Kerasotes/AMC 14 theater a few miles east in Cicero.

Paul Fortini
Paul Fortini on April 22, 2014 at 3:27 pm

Mikeoakandpark in all its sadness.

Mikeoaklandpark on April 22, 2014 at 2:13 pm

OMG they demolished Maurice Lennel.

Paul Fortini
Paul Fortini on April 22, 2014 at 7:42 am

The Maurice Lennel Cookie Company, which was just down the street from the Norridge Theatre, was recently demolished.

I wonder if a similar fate awaits the Norridge.

Cinemaven on April 22, 2013 at 3:49 pm

In the end, The Norridge theatre became a sad case. That somehow saddens me if I look back. Especially when I seen some films there during the 1980’s. Those actually seemed like the “Good Old Days”. I guess with other cinemas, And somehow general neglect, Plus the prospect of another business potentially taking over. The days & nights of the Norridge theatre in bloom would become a thing of the past.

CSWalczak on October 7, 2012 at 10:48 am

True, but my guess is that even if Classic Cinemas could purchase or get a lease on the property, it probably would not be able or willing to make the expensive investment that would be needed in making the digital upgrade and other renovations to this dated ten-screener, especially with the Muvico megaplex so relatively nearby. Also, if AMC owns the property , it has to be remembered that the company frequently puts ‘no further cinema use’ clauses in sale agreements.

Paul Fortini
Paul Fortini on October 7, 2012 at 9:03 am

I was thinking. It’s too bad someone like Classic Cinemas doesn’t step in and renovate this place. Look how well CC did with the North Riverside.

Justmyopinion on July 26, 2012 at 10:46 am

I grew-up in Norridge via the 70’s and 80’s. Lots of history and great memories of my town and Theater. Last time I was at the “Norridge” to see a show -was in the early 2000’s. Let me tell you. I was shocked and appalled by the riff raff cliental. Most/-all Norridge(ers) -has “NOT” utilized this gem of a “Once upon a time” Theater in many years- due to the bad cliental -and was forced to go elsewhere. With this said, I can see why “Norridge” is closing -and agree. Norridge is much too nice of an area to attract such a bad eliminate of people and criminals- such low-life’s. (Gang-Bangers) Norridge owners do not deserve this in their neighborhood. Let’s keep Norridge safe! Bad for the neighborhood -and too much unnecessary work for the fine Police Dept.
Sorry to see it go. End of an era.

-Just my opinion

GFeret on July 20, 2012 at 1:28 pm

no rocket science here, loews decided years ago the norridge didn’t bring in enough business to warrant multi-screen investment in digital projection, and from that point on they just wanted to phase the place out quietly

exact same thing happened a year or so ago w/ piper’s alley theatres

corporate execs. ask themselves “are we going to pay for new digital projectors on all these screens?” for each of their theatre properties and not in every case does the answer come back affirmative. especially when the underlying real-estate might have some pretty good value for other commercial ventures

quite a contrast to 3 decades ago or so when harlem avenue was so congested with cars turning into the norridge theatre parking lot on a friday/saturday night

oldest double-feature that comes to mind i saw at the norridge’s from early ‘70s – EXECUTIVE ACTION / RETURN OF A MAN CALLED HORSE

CSWalczak on July 20, 2012 at 10:02 am

I think except for the Century 9 and the Metreon theaters and perhaps a few others, I think almost all the theaters within San Francisco are traditional slope floor theaters – Stonestown, Castro, Balboa, 4 Star, Embarcadero, Empire, Presidio, Bridge, Lumiere, Opera Plaza, Vogue, etc.

Scott Neff
Scott Neff on July 20, 2012 at 9:17 am

I always wanted to see a movie here but sadly I stopped working in Chicago for I got the chance.

Just looking at the pictures makes me wish there was a good old slope seated theatre I could see a movie at around San Francisco.

BobbyS on July 19, 2012 at 9:58 pm

I will answer my own question. 4 days after closing for good, the attraction board is blank and the LOEWS THEATERS sign is removed. Gone forever..

BobbyS on July 17, 2012 at 10:25 pm

I too am surprised AMC didn’t wait until September to shut it down especially since “Batman” opens Thursday pm. One of the sites are stll giving “BATMAN” showtimes for Thursday, Friday and Saturday. Is it possible they will only show one movie this week-end?

aek316 on July 17, 2012 at 11:30 am

I spoke to an employee at the theater as their number is still listed on Fandango and he told me AMC shut them down. No current plans for the building he said that’s strictly up to the landlords, but AMC is done with the theater. In a perfect world, someone like Classic Cinemas would step in and give it the new life it needs, but I’m sure some stupid big box store will be going there!

aek316 on July 17, 2012 at 11:27 am

I knew this was coming. Broan is right on, they ran this place into the ground which is a horrible shame. 40+ years in business! While renovations were sorely needed, this theater was very unique. It had big screening rooms unlike the ones you have at today’s multiplexes, comfortable seats and a look that recalled theaters of yesteryear. As usual, AMC let it rot into oblivion just like they did with countless other theaters they owned that were older. Classic Cinemas please step in before it’s too late!

Broan on July 16, 2012 at 3:17 pm

You get the impression that AMC approached it like an old car – just enough maintenance to keep it running until something serious breaks, running out the clock.

whtesoxfan56 on July 16, 2012 at 2:11 pm

Yeah, same here. In a way, I’m not surprised it finally closed, since it was hemmoraging in its attendance for years. Muvico especially put a nail into the coffin(when it came to its attendance), as well as the opening of newer theaters in surrounding areas in recent years(i.e. Showplace 12(Golf Mill) in Niles, etc.).

The last several times I saw a movie here in recent years(and as recently as December 2011, primarily since it was the only theater it was playing at), I always got the impression AMC put next to no investment into this theater, vs. other ones they own(i.e. Village Crossing 18 in Skokie). I must say that I always got the impression the last few times I saw a movie here that if a company other than AMC owned Norridge(and threw some money to improve it, a la when Kerasotes renovated Webster Place), that it would’ve really helped things a lot. If this theater ever were to reopen(and I really doubt it, especially with the digital projection deadline being December 2012), I couldn’t see it being viable except as a 2nd-run theater.

CSWalczak on July 16, 2012 at 1:48 pm

I don’t see another operator taking it over especially for the reasons Broan cites; currently Chicago does not have many smaller operators except for Classic Theaters which I doubt would be interested. The closing will probably give the Muvico at Rosemont a boost.

Broan on July 16, 2012 at 1:41 pm

Norridge is so far different from what AMC’s direction is. I can’t see them investing in a non-stadium, irregular theater that requires 2 concession stands, 2 sets of bathrooms, has poor visibility, excessively large auditoriums, etc. Maybe a smaller operator will want to deal with it, but it would still need 10 digital projectors at a minimum and major renovations to bring audiences back. It would probably be more efficient to just build a new one, like AMC did at Randhurst.

Mikeoaklandpark on July 16, 2012 at 1:20 pm

So is the closure permanant or temporary?

Broan on July 16, 2012 at 1:18 pm

Yeah, I should have rewritten that before I posted. Here: The original twin theaters, which sat 1200 and 900 respectively, were ultimately subdivided into screens 5-10. I’m guessing at which screens were involved, but this sounds like the most likely series of expansions and splits to me. A third screen was added to the right side of the building (ultimately called Theater 1) and opened July 25, 1975. A fourth screen was opened June 10, 1977, which was probably the flat-roofed section to the far right of the building, now theater 2. A fifth screen was created by a split in 1983. Screens six and seven seem to have been additions to the rear of theaters 1 and 2. Three more screens were created by splits in 1988, opening on memorial day.

As for the closure, signs on the door of screens 5-10 explained that they were closed due to a water main break, which probably brought about the closure of the remaining screens. Otherwise it seems odd to close a theater a week before the opening of The Dark Knight Rises.

Tim O'Neill
Tim O'Neill on July 16, 2012 at 1:01 pm

Broan: to quote Vinnie Barbarino…“I’m so confused!!!”

Broan on July 16, 2012 at 8:16 am

Here is an updated link to Box Office Magazine of November 2, 1970. I’m adding photos I took about 5 years ago and a couple from last night.