Los Angeles Theatre

615 S. Broadway,
Los Angeles, CA 90014

Unfavorite 67 people favorited this theater

Showing 176 - 200 of 329 comments

Lost Memory
Lost Memory on July 11, 2007 at 1:36 pm

Look at the detail on this building. Its a shame that this is no longer an everyday movie theater.

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on July 11, 2007 at 1:27 pm

There is going to be some fight if they ever try to bulldoze this. At least I hope there will be a fight.

Lost Memory
Lost Memory on July 11, 2007 at 1:15 pm

Here is a recent close-up of the Los Angeles.

rfwebber
rfwebber on May 31, 2007 at 8:04 am

You’re right. My apologies.

William
William on May 31, 2007 at 7:49 am

In the above comment you stated “When Dr. Scott first acquired the State”, you mean the United Artists theatre right.

rfwebber
rfwebber on May 31, 2007 at 7:11 am

The State is leased to a Hispanic church, which doesn’t want it to be used for other anything else, period. The situation at the UA is more interesting. That theatre is owned by the Gene Scott ministries. When Dr. Scott first acquired the State he not only spent a lot of money restoring it but seemed to be open to the idea of it being used for other purposes when not needed for church services (Sunday mornings), much like the old Ambassador Auditorium in Pasadena. In fact, Last Remaining Seats had a couple of screenings at the theatre with his blessing and he allowed the Conservancy’s Saturday morning tours in there on a regular basis. However, one always felt that he was a little nervous about having “strangers” in his building. His church attendees were carefully screened (you couldn’t attend services without making a reservation in advance) and when the Conservancy tour groups came in they were always accompanied by one or more church security people and closely watched throughout their visit. So at a certain point he informed the Conservancy that no more LRS or other outside events would be permitted at the theatre. The tours continued, however, until 9/11, at which point his apparent nervousness about possible “terrorist” plots prompted him to terminate those as well. Dr. Scott died recently and the church is now in the hands of his widow, who seems even less inclined to allow outside groups in. (“This is a church, not a tourist attraction!”) So it appears that the beautifully restored UA will, for the foreseeable future, be off-limits to anyone except the church parishioners.

shatter
shatter on May 31, 2007 at 5:31 am

<<They’ve been approached, but no dice. (Same situation at the United Artists.) posted by Richard W on May 12, 2007 at 10:50am >>

I would love to see films at these locations as well. Just out of curiosity, Richard W, can you divulge what their rationale is? You’d think the owners would be interested in maintaining the public’s interest (as well as pocketing the dough they’d receive for something like this) in these landmarks, not shun the curious.

shatter
shatter on May 31, 2007 at 5:20 am

I was there last night to view “Roman Holiday” as part of the Last Remaining Seats series. I had never been to the theater and wow — I agree with all the above comments. I’ve never seen such detail, such craftsmanship in a theater. The three levels of seating, the enormous rooms downstairs that weren’t even utilized (the ones separating the bathrooms; the “lounge”, what looked like a kitchen). What a labyrinth. Security wasn’t tight and we were tempted to sneak up the various stairwells but decided not to. An amazing place. I hope they replace the worn carpet and continue the restoration. Wouldn’t it be great to see movies here again all the time? The audience sure appreciated it.

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on May 26, 2007 at 8:16 am

An article in today’s LA Times discussed a proposal to turn Broadway between 2nd and 9th into a pedestrian mall with a busway. This had been proposed in 1977, but nothing came of it. The general manager of the Los Angeles theater was quoted favorably on the issue. I recall that this was done on Chestnut Street in the 80s with limited success. I think that street is once again open to traffic.

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on May 18, 2007 at 8:54 am

Here is a circa 1940s photo from the USC archive:
http://tinyurl.com/2xxzog

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on May 14, 2007 at 5:39 am

The Culver is across the street from the old MGM studio.

rroudebush
rroudebush on May 14, 2007 at 4:31 am

The “old drive-in in Culver City” mentioned above was the Studio Drive-In where Jefferson and Sepulveda come together. Unfortunately, it has been demolished. A housing project is on the site.

I was in downtown Culver City yesterday and saw that the Old Culver Theater, a wonderful old Art Deco movie house, has been turned into the Kirk Douglas Theater, a legitimate theater. It’s near the Culver Hotel, where the Munchkins were put up during the filming of Wizard of Oz – it’s the tallest building in town. You can’t miss it.

rfwebber
rfwebber on May 12, 2007 at 7:50 am

They’ve been approached, but no dice. (Same situation at the United Artists.) I’m quite sure that the theatre is still equipped to show movies. The Million Dollar has been off-limits because of a hazard from loose ceiling plaster caused by the last earthquake.

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on May 11, 2007 at 2:17 pm

I will bet that if you offer the Iglesia people at the State some amount of money, they will set up a big movie screen on the stage, assuming the old one is not there anymore. I would pay to see a movie there, or in the Million Dollar.

rfwebber
rfwebber on May 11, 2007 at 2:02 pm

I agree. The first LRS, 20 years ago, was intended to be a one-time event which would spotlight a number of the old, neglected theatres on Broadway and attempt to recreate the early movie palace experience. Little did those of us involved in planning that first series know that it would take off and become the blockbuster (and major money-maker for the Conservancy) that it is today. In the early years, the Los Angeles and the Orpheum were used, of course, but also, the State, the United Artists, the Million Dollar and the Palace downtown and theatres in other parts of town, such as the Westlake, the Wiltern, the South Pasadena Rialto and even an old drive-in in Culver City. For various reasons, including the unavailabilty of some of these venues, size requirements and probably some political and sponsorship considerations, the current planners seem to have moved away from the original intent; spotlighting lesser-known and neglected theatres seems to be no longer the main thrust. (The Alex is hardly neglected and why the Ford was chosen truly mystifies me — probably for political reasons!)

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on May 11, 2007 at 10:05 am

I always appreciate the program, so I don’t want to appear to be grousing. However, it seems like the theater rotation was better when I started attending a decade ago. I suppose it’s not possible to screen films in some of the other Broadway theaters, like the State for example, but I’m not too motivated to see a movie at the Ford that I can watch on AMC. The idea is to see the movies in the original settings. Just an opinion.

rfwebber
rfwebber on May 11, 2007 at 8:28 am

Don’t miss the rare opportunity to see the interior of this theatre in all its lit-up glory by attending the L.A. Conservancy’s annual “Last Remaining Seats” film and live entertainment series. This year, in addition to 2 events at the Los Angeles, they are featuring the L.A. Orpheum, the Alex in Glendale and the John Anson Ford Amphitheatre. The dates are May 23 (Orpheum), May 30 (Los Angeles), June 6 (Orpheum), June 13 (Los Angeles), June 20 (Ford) and June 27 (Alex). For program and other information, visit http://www.laconservancy.org .

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on May 11, 2007 at 5:56 am

Use the link that Richard W posted in April.

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on May 11, 2007 at 5:55 am

The CA state library website has hundreds of pictures of this theater, mostly interior and mostly from the thirties. No way to post them all here, but it’s worth a look.

Joe Vogel
Joe Vogel on May 10, 2007 at 7:45 pm

Ken, that 1931 photo must have been taken on the opening night. City Lights, indeed!

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on May 10, 2007 at 3:35 pm

This is an interesting photo from 1931. Hopefully it hasn’t already been posted:
http://tinyurl.com/2wevpk

AdoraKiaOra
AdoraKiaOra on May 3, 2007 at 1:37 am

The auditorium of this great looking theatre is beautiful. Not too large a capacity either for transformation to a full scale programed theatre. My god, i love that auditorium so much. THe side boxes are fantastic.

rfwebber
rfwebber on April 8, 2007 at 1:42 pm

There is a treasure trove of pictures of the Los Angeles Theatre, interior and exterior, ca 1931, at the California State Library web site. I counted over 130 pictures available for viewing and/or download there. (There is also a huge cache of pictures of the Hollywood Pantages Theatre plus a handful of shots of other L.A. area theatres at the same web site.) Enjoy.

http://www.lib.state.ca.us/html/welcome.html

rroudebush
rroudebush on April 6, 2007 at 4:51 am

We were told, when the cast of Manon Lescaut was given a tour of the theater, that the wigs of the French nobility on the curtain were made of real human hair.

You can see an excerpt of the Manon Lescaut on YouTube. Unfortunately, it doesn’t show much of the interior of the theater, but it does give you an idea of what a production looked like on stage (I am on the far left – stage right – as “The Sergeant” – and am barely audible!).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqqMLrFae0I

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on April 5, 2007 at 2:49 pm

I moved to LA in 1984 and could barely breath when I was looking for a job downtown. The situation has improved considerably.