Loew's State Theatre

1540 Broadway,
New York, NY 10036

Unfavorite 39 people favorited this theater

Showing 351 - 375 of 535 comments

JoeMcKendry
JoeMcKendry on March 30, 2006 at 10:44 am

Sorry, Here the first part of my message:

There is a photo at the following site: www.lileks.com/NYC/timessquare/33.html

that shows an /…… enormous billboard..

JoeMcKendry
JoeMcKendry on March 30, 2006 at 10:39 am

enormous billboard advertising “The Bible.. In the Beginning, which opened at Loew’s State in Sept. 1966. At that same site, a few pictures earlier the billboard advertises what looks to be a Barnum and Bailey circus event – the sight claims this view is from 1963. The billboard stretches the entire block between 45th and 46th Streets over the Astor and Victoria theaters.
I’m looking for information about what content appeared on that billboard (specifically, I’m interested in what appeared on it in the Spring – Summer of 1964). I assume it wasn’t always movies that appeared at Loew’s because of the Barnum Ad that I saw. Does anyone have any insight into this?

JoeMcKendry
JoeMcKendry on March 30, 2006 at 10:30 am

enormous billboard advertising “The Bible.. In the Beginning, which opened at Loew’s State in Sept. 1966. At that same site, a few pictures earlier the billboard advertises what looks to be a Barnum and Bailey circus event – the sight claims this view is from 1963. The billboard stretches the entire block between 45th and 46th Streets over the Astor and Victoria theaters.
I’m looking for information about what content appeared on that billboard (specifically, I’m interested in what appeared on it in the Spring – Summer of 1964). I assume it wasn’t always movies that appeared at Loew’s because of the Barnum Ad that I saw. Does anyone have any insight into this?

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on March 27, 2006 at 8:52 am

This is definitely the theater jmen2465 remembers. “Star Trek II” opened here in June of ‘82 and “Tron” opened here the following month. I know “Tron” played the State 2 upstairs in the former loge/balcony (hence the “ampitheater” style seating) which was open to the original ornate ceiling and upper side walls and proscenium arch. The former orchestra downstairs suffered a drop ceiling and curtains that obscured the entire perimeter of the theater, giving it the modern unadorned look jmen recalls. Time may have slightly altered jmen’s memories of the two auditoriums being side by side rather than up and down. However, I recall that the lobby was split left and right, with the stairs and escalators to the State 2 against the far right wall. I can’t explain why jmen recalls an organ still being in place at that time.

ERD
ERD on March 27, 2006 at 7:14 am

Radio City Music Hall (first called the International Music Hall) was not originally built for motion pictures. The only movie palace left in the theatre district area is The Hollywood(Mark Hellinger)
which became a legitimate stage theatre, and now is a church.

RichHamel
RichHamel on March 27, 2006 at 1:56 am

jmen2465—I agree, Manhattan has lost a large number of theaters over the last thirty years. However, we aren’t running on empty yet. We do still have a little place called Radio City Music Hall.

jmen2465
jmen2465 on March 26, 2006 at 5:55 am

Is this the theater where the movie “Tron” played in the summer of ‘82-'83? That was the Disney movie that made history for being the first to use cgi or computer generated images. It starred Jeff Bridges. I saw the movie then and thought the theater was called Loew’s Twin. The theater on the right was a roccoco movie palace with beautiful scenes painted all over the ceiling and wall. Amphitheater style seating, an organ, and a huge curved screen. Seeing “Tron” there was amazing in terms of both image and sound.

The other side of the twin was more modern and totally boring, with a much smaller screen. I saw Star Trek 2 there…

Am I right? It’s a shame that magnificent theater was demolished. What happened in the so called renovation of Times Square was a terrible crime. We lost many movie Cathedrals. Now we only have the Jersey Loews and hopefully the Bronx Loews will be rescued. As far as Manhattan is concerned, unless somebody takes over the “United Palace” in Upper Manhattan, we’ll have nothing left. What a shame…

RobertEndres
RobertEndres on February 13, 2006 at 7:22 am

Not only were the projectors in the upstairs booth at an angle, a projectionist pointed out to me the first time I visited that because the screen was parallel to the back wall after the renovation, the furthest projector back had a lens ¼" focal length longer than the other two. The angle of that booth always intrigued me too. I also had the feeling sitting in the downstairs house that while the screen was parallel to the new projection booth, the proscenium itself was actually at an angle on the stage that matched the angle of the balcony booth. I worked in the downstairs booth, but never upstairs. The upstairs booth was also dropped several feet from its original position after the twinning. I remember seeing windows that would have originally faced out on the street about 10' or so above the booth floor, and a radiator that would have been at floor level hanging from the wall above. When I saw “The Agony and the Ecstasy” 70mm roadshow there the booth was dug into the front of the balcony to give a zero degree projection angle to the curved screen which was mounted in front of the proscenium. The angle of the proscenium to the back wall was concealed, but I remember sitting in the balcony and looking up at the original booth and noting the odd angle. Perhaps the auditorium was laid out like the Roxy to some extent with the stage more slightly angled into a corner. Another house like that in Manhattan is the Beacon, with the projection booth and the spotlight booth above it appearing slightly off center as you look at them from the stage.

William
William on February 13, 2006 at 7:12 am

Richard Dziadzio:

I asked another operator that worked the theatre the same question. He had no answer as to why the ports were at that angle.

stepale2
stepale2 on February 13, 2006 at 5:54 am

To add to the list of Broadway’s legit houses where movies had their premieres there was also the Booth where MGM’s Jullius Caesar opened in 1953.

BoxOfficeBill
BoxOfficeBill on February 13, 2006 at 3:54 am

As I remember it, the situation of Loew’s State was about as regular as one can get, with the rear balcony wall on W 45 Street and the rear stage wall on W 46 Street. During intermissions in the roadshow era, the W 45 Street exit doors were opened to allow patrons a smoking area on the street.

dave-bronx™
dave-bronx™ on February 11, 2006 at 9:38 am

It’s kind of hard to believe that Lamb, the #1 theatre architect of the day, would “forget” to include dressing rooms in the flagship house of his major client. With vaudeville being a major part of the show in those days it would seem that dressing rooms would be considered part of the stage. That would be like today “forgetting” to put in the candy stand – it doesn’t happen. I could understand the architect forgeting to include a niche in the lobby for a vending machine, but not such a major part of the operation as dressing rooms. If they were indeed not there, there had to be some extenuating circumstances, such as space constraints due to an odd shaped lot, or something like that. In Richard Dziadzio’s post above, he mentions that the projectors in the original booth were mounted at a 15 degree angle to the right leading me to believe that the building was not exactly rectangular. In that case the stage would have been 15 degrees off center, which may have left inadequate space for dressing rooms on one side of the stage.

dickdziadzio
dickdziadzio on February 11, 2006 at 4:23 am

In response to dave-bronx question on Jan, 21, 2006.
When the State was twinned in 1968, the 3 Norelco 70mm
machines went to the downstairs house. Upstairs #2 house
got the 3 Century 70mm machines from the closing Capitol
Cinerama up the street.

I posted a question a year ago on 2-14-05 on this theatre
about the reason why the upstairs booth faced a little toward
the left wall. It was very weird in the booth with the 3 projectors
having to be mounted about 15 degrees to the right to compensate.

Does anybody have an explaination?

BoxOfficeBill
BoxOfficeBill on February 11, 2006 at 3:24 am

That’s a great story about the architectural fiasco of the State’s dressing rooms! But why didn’t Loew simply use the several floors of office space above the lobby for a temporary site until the building on E 46 became available? The office workers could have used other space in the neighborhood. In any case, I’m glad to hear that some architects goofed in the grand manner then as others continue to do today.

RichHamel
RichHamel on February 3, 2006 at 8:37 am

EdSolero—Actually, at times the traffic back then was more dangerous. Every street and avenue was two-way.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on February 3, 2006 at 8:33 am

Understood, Warren. I thought as much. Otherwise, that might have made for some hectic scrambling out on W. 45th Street! Fortunately, vehicular traffic was probably not what it is today in that area.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on February 3, 2006 at 5:54 am

So the actors would prepare for the show at the former New York theater facilities and then cross W. 45th in full makeup to make their way into the State? That is pretty remarkable. It must have been hell on any performers who appeared in more than one scene and had to change costumes and makeup!

William
William on January 26, 2006 at 2:52 am

Yes, the State was equipped with Norelco DP70 type projectors.

dave-bronx™
dave-bronx™ on January 20, 2006 at 10:55 pm

Any of the New York projectionists on this site know if the old State had Todd-AO 70s in the booth?

IanJudge
IanJudge on January 20, 2006 at 6:49 pm

This is totally from memory, but I know one of them was “The Golden Child” …. can’t remember the other. Someone with NYT microfiche could look it up… there was even a little blurb about the closing in the NYT.

uncleal923
uncleal923 on January 20, 2006 at 5:50 pm

I am now wondering what the last films were to play the original Loew’s State. I was there when it first went twin, so I have no doubt it would be at least two.

ChrisB
ChrisB on January 9, 2006 at 1:56 am

Here’s “Godzilla, King of the Monsters” from April 1956:

View link

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on January 5, 2006 at 9:43 am

Not quite.
Frenzy played there after Applause.

Mikeoaklandpark
Mikeoaklandpark on January 5, 2006 at 7:51 am

Ed
From what I can tell, Gigi was the only film to play the Royal. The Palace theater shows going back to a legit theater in 1966 (including What it says in At This Theater),but I remember in 68 and 69 they were showing movies again. It wasn’t until 1970 that they permanantly reopened as a legit theater with Lauren Bacall in Applause.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on January 4, 2006 at 5:38 pm

On that we can heartily agree, Vincent. “Gladiator” certainly deserved a proper palace for its premier presentation, rather than the unceremonious standard-issue wide release it was given. Even that granddaddy of the modern Hollywood blockbuster imperative, “Jaws” had the magnificent Rivoli for its gala premier back in ‘75.