Rivoli Theatre

1620 Broadway,
New York, NY 10019

Unfavorite 44 people favorited this theater

Showing 576 - 600 of 921 comments

rlvjr
rlvjr on June 4, 2005 at 12:51 pm

We saw Arnold Schwartznegger’s PREDITOR here on their big screen. About 30 minutes into the show, about 4 or 5 jive-turkeys came in and began making noise as if nobody else was there. Several shush! shush! sounds from the audience yielded the agonizingly familiar “We paid our money and we won’t shut up.. blah, blah, blah!” Then I heard one Negro voice say out loud, “You’re the reason us N…… don’t never have nuthin' cuz people like you ruin it for ev'body!” I’ll never forget that, never forget the guy who said it. AMEN.

BobT
BobT on June 1, 2005 at 12:51 pm

“Dawn Of The Dead” was released by United Film Distribution. It was owned by UA and run by Salah’s son Richard Hassanein. I worked for them for a while between managing gigs. The home office was behind The UA Meadowbrook Theatre in East Meadow. All UFD films played at all UA theatres at one time or the other.“Day Of The Dead” and “Mother’s Day”, both unrated horror films opened at The UA Gemini on the upper east side. UFD also released John Landis' “Kentucky Fried Movie”, Larry Cohen’s “Q, The Winged Serpent” and Romero’s “Knightriders” among many and always had a double feature available for slow release weeks. Not only did “Dawn” play the UA Rivoli, I would almost bet it played there every re-release until they built the extra screens downstairs at the UA Criterion.

RobertR
RobertR on May 29, 2005 at 7:31 am

Scott
Yes Dawn of the Dead played the Rivoli, I forget the name of the releasing company but UA and Salah Hassanein owned the majority shares. There was also a time when the Rivoli was still a single screen and still getting top bookings when they had a week and a half gap before a big picture was opening. They ran a George Romero festival with a different double bill every three days.

Vito
Vito on May 29, 2005 at 4:03 am

William, I worked post production at 20th Century fox and also at News of the Day for a while in the late 50s. It was tense but I enjoyed it a lot and we always had passes to the Roxy and Rivoli. The guys at News of the Day had a very stressful job with new footgae being delivered all day long and having to get two newsreels out every week.

scottfavareille
scottfavareille on May 28, 2005 at 4:42 pm

According to a documentary on the Anchor Bay DVD of Dawn of the Dead(Ultimate Edition), the Rivoli played Dawn on its first run engagement, which would have been May 1979.

William
William on May 26, 2005 at 11:51 am

I still run track & picture screenings, but not as many as before. But I’m not in the regular theatre world. I’m in Post-Production projection, its like working a film festival 5 days a week.

Vito
Vito on May 26, 2005 at 11:33 am

I forgot to mention the film transport, we have two three stacked platters, so that when we run 3-D, one for the left eye and one for the right.
William I’d say 80% of the studio test screenings I did before I retired were D-5 tape. There are fewer and fewer screenings using unmarried prints.
I should explain to anyone not understanding, an unmarried print is what we would use to show sneak and test sceenings of unfinished movies. The picture and sound were on seperate reels which would be interlocked. I am sure Rob has had a lot of experience with this at RCMH

Vito
Vito on May 26, 2005 at 11:12 am

CConnolly, I shall tell you what I know about IMAX.
First of all the picture is not digital, but a 70mm fifteen perforation film which runs thru the IMAX projectr horizontally at 24 frames per second. The projector is capable of running two prints at the same time for 3-D.The sound comes on CD disks which is then loaded onto the computer’s hard drive which syncs up the picture and sound. In the theatre I worked, the light source is a 15,000 watt lamp and the sound system carried 12,000 watts of power. A wall to wall,floor to ceiling silver screen, to maximize the reflection to the audience, was installed. IMAX has been a new shot in the arm now due to DMR which is a process of digitally re-mastering regularly shot 35mm movies to the IMAX process,as was the case in “Robots” and the upcoming “Batman Returns” amoung many others.
I hope I helped explain a bit about IMAX and hope someone with more knowledge can add to or correct anything I wrote

chconnol
chconnol on May 26, 2005 at 8:54 am

Sorry, but it sounds like to me that digital film projection is the wave of the future. The only thing that’s preventing it’s total takeover is the fact that movie attendence is so down. What could possibly justify the cost to the theaters if the numbers are low? A few blockbusters that are truly worthy and attendence should go up. THEN digital will take over. But from looking at the slim pickings coming out this summer, I don’t see myself going much to the theater either.

William
William on May 26, 2005 at 8:44 am

It is not like it once was with film, Digital is picking up speed in doing preview screenings. I still run a lot of film, but we do about 4-6 different video type screenings a week. Today I have two HD screenings, one from a D-5 format and another from HDcam-SR, plus two film screenings. Some people might say it is hard to go from film and video type formats. It really isn’t that hard to do.

chconnol
chconnol on May 26, 2005 at 8:24 am

Are most IMAX films digital?

It’s interesting that you cite “The Polar Express” (AWFUL, AWFUL movie…gave me the creeps!) But there was an interesting article in “Entertainment Weekly” about two weeks ago that stated that theater attendance is way, way off now. And the article pretty much came to the conclusion that we here already derived: movies today SUCK. So audiences are staying away. EXCEPT…for “The Polar Express” in IMAX which they said did very good business, better than it did in the conventional box megaplexes. So did the IMAX release of “Robots” (another dud). The article said that apparently audiences are willing to see a movie on a BIG screen.

So that’s ironic. Obviously it’s not just the terrible films but the way that these movies are being presented that is keeping audiences away. People WANT the big screens and such.

Vito
Vito on May 26, 2005 at 8:00 am

Rob, I can only imagine the pressur of working at RCMH. But it had to be a rewarding and thrilling experience. As for the Guys running digital, I suppose it must have it’s anxious moments. As a film projectionist, when something went wrong we could generally take care of the problem. Switching rectifiers/generators for a light source problem or amplifiers when the sound gave us trouble. Heck, most of us at one time or another have had to change out an intermittent or replace a drive gear at one time or another not to mention a water cooled jaw in a arc lamp house that suddenly sprung a leak. Ahh the memories… but my experience with digital was one of
a feeling of helpness when it went sour, something I was not used to or enjoyed very much. All one could do was call the 800# for tech support. As you very well know, digital projection comes with it’s one sets of problems. So the industry had changed a great deal, my last booth job was in an IMAX theatre, I played “Polar Express” in IMAX 3-D. What a nightmare that was!, the print didi not carry a time code as does DTS for example, but rather runs on it’s own program so the chances of losing sync was always about. Then of course if you had a film break and lost any frames in the left eye print you had to replace (slug) the missing footage in the right eye print to keep everything matched up. Of course we had to do the same thing in the old 3-D and Cinerama days and I know some of the boys would sometimes cheat and simply remove the missing footage from all the prints, but with IMAX if you did that you would lose sound sync.
But at least we had film, and running 2-3 or even, as you did, 5 projectors in a single thetare in a single booth. I miss that!

RobertEndres
RobertEndres on May 26, 2005 at 7:42 am

CConnolly: Digital cinema is an extension of video projection used in home systems upgraded to theatre quality. The originating source may be high-definition tape (Panasonic D-5, or Sony HDCam)usually running with 1080 lines of resolution vertically and either at the film speed of 24 frames per second or the video frame rate of 30 frames per second), or from a server using computer drives. The material may be delivered via satellite or on tape or from hard drives. The most common projector at this point uses Texas Instruments DLP technology which uses mirrors from three chips to reflect light from the lamphouse to the screen. Sony and JVC use a competing technology using reflective silicon on chips that is in a sense what you see with a digital wristwatch display except the crystals are reflective rather than black. Sony has announced a projector that will do up to 4,000 lines of resolution which should equal or exceed the resolution of 35mm film. You are right about the encryption issues to prevent piracy. The material may be fed in encoded digital form into the projector for conversion to analogue for viewing to prevent hacking since it never exists in analogue form outside of the projector itself. In addition, keys may be generated by the distributor to license the film to exactly the number of screens in a complex and for exactly the number of days the picture is being screened. The National Association of Theatre Owners and the Digital Cinema Initiative have been working to formalize standards for theatrical presentation with the goal that digital cinema presentation be of higher quality than the 1080 hi-def presentation people have in their home theatres and at least as good or better than 35mm film is now. A good part of the motion-picture industry has already “gone digital” for editing and preview purposes, with more and more sneak previews done from D-5 tape rather than film interlocked to a separate track. Now the technology is becoming available to change exhibition as well. There are questions about who is going to pay for the convrsion and preventing piracy, but its a pretty interesting time for theatre technology.

Gerald A. DeLuca
Gerald A. DeLuca on May 26, 2005 at 2:24 am

Bill Huelbig, you might want to add your link for that interesting “Days of Heaven” booklet to the Cinema 1, 2, 3 site.

Coate
Coate on May 25, 2005 at 9:26 pm

“A 70MM print of "Howard’s End” was shown at the Paris for nearly a year in the early 1990s.“ (ErikH)


A couple of minor corrections re the New York City run of “Howards End” — the film did play at the Paris, though the theater was known as the Fine Arts at the time. The duration of the Fine Arts run was 33 weeks. It immediately moved to the Village East, where it ran for another 31 weeks in 70mm.

View link

View link

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on May 25, 2005 at 8:38 pm

I found that “Days of Heaven” book I mentioned in an earlier post. Here’s the cover:

View link

PeterApruzzese
PeterApruzzese on May 25, 2005 at 2:31 pm

Vito – Thanks for the clarification, that makes it clearer. Otherwise, I’d be asking where I could get 70mm parts for my Century’s for the Lafayette!

chconnol
chconnol on May 25, 2005 at 1:28 pm

I know some of you projectionists explained this once but I still don’t “get” how digital projection works. How is the image “shown”? There’s no film, right? I’m sorry but could someone either explain (simply…) or tell me about a website that could?

Also, about two years ago I read about another even more radical film medium wherein the movie would actually be “beamed” via satellite to theaters. If a movie proved to be a big enough draw (HA! Like with todays crap…) another theater in a multiplex could be instantly turned over to that film. The issue was how to prevent hackers from getting a hold of the signal and transmitting it to another area (theater, PC, etc.) Anyone aware of this?

Gerald A. DeLuca
Gerald A. DeLuca on May 25, 2005 at 1:01 pm

I saw “Days of Heaven” at Cinema I in 70mm and was immediately overwhelmed by the imagery and eerie nostalgia of this stupefying masterpiece. What a truly beautiful film! Nestor Almendros' photography is a feast for the eye. And that musical score by Ennio Morricone based on a motif from Camille Saint-Saëns' “Carnival of the Animals: The Aquarium” was pure inspiration and utterly haunting. I kept going back to see it in Providence, where I am from, at the Cinerama I & II where it was also shown in 70mm. I read at the time that Bernardo Bertolucci had been extremely impressed by the movie. Although I like both “Badlands” and “The Thin Red Line” a great deal, I don’t believe Malick has surpassed this one.

RobertEndres
RobertEndres on May 25, 2005 at 1:00 pm

Vito, I imagine the projectionists at the Ziegfeld WORRY! It is new technology, and during the pre-opening screenings of “Star Wars” a representative of Texas Instruments which had their prototype projector in before the opening, and a Dolby representative were also on hand for each screening. (If there were one more tech they might have been able to have a card game going!) As you know — you’re only as good as your last show and “stuff” happens. It always amazes me that for a premiere at the Zieg or the Music Hall, everyone would have a tech representative on hand, but when the picture opens and the audience had to pay, there would often be no tech assistance available. With the elimination of projectionists there are fewer and fewer people around exhibition who continue to care about the presentation (see “Uptown Theatre Washington D.C. on this site for the latest example). There was always the tension of being in the "Showplace of the Nation” at Radio City, and even though digital presentation may be boring, I’ll bet the guys at the Zieg are feeling a bit of tension these days too. Things can go from boredom to chaos in an instant.

William
William on May 25, 2005 at 12:53 pm

The Sound One screening room (Todd-AO sound) on 54th Street, can also run 70MM too.

ErikH
ErikH on May 25, 2005 at 12:48 pm

Another NYC theater that has 70MM capability is the Paris. A 70MM print of “Howard’s End” was shown at the Paris for nearly a year in the early 1990s. Kenneth Branagh’s film of “Hamlet” was also presented in 70MM at the Paris.

Vito
Vito on May 25, 2005 at 12:44 pm

By thr way REandres, I trained in digital projection before I retired and I am sure glad I never had to work any shifts with digital projection. There is so litle to do. I thought it got boring with platters, but gosh all you do with digital is log on to a computer choose a platter (film) and hit the start button. My goodness what in the world do those projectionists at the Ziegfeld do all day? That has to be a boring job. I only wish I had a chance to work RCMH during the glory days.

Vito
Vito on May 25, 2005 at 12:34 pm

Thanks REandres for that info. I forgot about the water cooled gates
Peter, you misunderstood, I never wrote all projectors are compatable. I am refering to 35/70 projectors, which is what all 70mm theatres have. There is nothing to do but convert the idle rollers, change the aperture plate and lens and your done. As for platters, most of them have feed plates (brains) that simply change out for either 35 or 70 and duel purpose guide rollers so again, little has to be done. As for the masking, we usually have three presetts, Flat, Scope and 70 for both the side and top masking settings. I have had several sneak preview showings of a 70mm print
playing with a 35mm feature and two of us did the conversion during
intermission, (about 20 minutes). In the case of DTS readers, nothing has to be done with them because they are always there, usually mounted above the mag penthouse, and simply bypassed when not in use. I suppose if you wanted to play a 70mm DTS print followed by a 35mm DTS print you would have much more work but that would be unusual.