Showing 201 - 225 of 715 comments
the opening weekend gross of Dunkirk was only
$50 million? isn’t that rather low. it was not a
long film so they could get in more screenings
per day. again a rather low amount.
I saw Dunkirk at the 1p.m. screening in the IMAX
auditorium. !!!!! WOW!!!!! is my reaction. with
the combination of the image and the sound you felt
you were on the beach with the 400,000 soldiers.
one question. toward the end of the film when anumber of the young soldiers are in the bottom ofthe landlocked boat Harry Styles' character getsreally angry at another soldier. for the life ofme I can’t remember why Styles. character gotangry. why did he?
to Joe Vogel thanks for the info about the
Northpoint. I guess the story with the Northpoint
is similar to the recently closed Ziegfeld
in Midtown. no one I know had any complaints
about the theater in terms of the projection,
sound etc…..but the last few years any big
film that played the Ziegfeld also played 10 to
12 other theaters in Manhattan. plus lets be
honest even if it were making money what
multiplex chain wants to spend the time to
operate a large single screen movie theater.
its sad the only 1st run single screen movie
theater left in Manhattan is the Paris.
i haven’t been out to San Francisco for maybe 10?
years. to which i was shocked to hear the Northpoint
closed. i always liked the theater during my
trips out to your city. so why did it close? lack
of business or the landlord sold the land? i
looked at theater’s page but non one has posted
there for well over a year so i thought i’d ask here.
I am not talking about all the crap at the
beginning I am talking about the running time
of the film itself. to which 1hr. 46mins. is
on the short side for a large scale historical
Dunkirk is only 1hr. 46mins.? that’s on the
short side for a large scale historical epic.
I have no idea what the NYC Building Code says but
I should think it would illegal to operate a movie
theater during the summer with no AC.
when Dunkirk opens on July 21 I assume it will
play in both the IMAX and Loews auditoriums. when
looking up the show times on IMBD how can I tell
which screening is in the Loews auditorium?
I thank all my fellow posters for the info
posted recently about this theater.
also to Howard B.. I heard thru the grapevine that
the main reason AMC closed the Loews Tower East is
that they had no desire to operate a single screen
movie theater. the only 1st run single screen
movie theater left in Manhattan is the Paris.
to Al A. many thanks for you reply. indeed the
exhibition business since the 62 St. & 1st Ave.
first opened. the Cinema 1 was for years one of
the leading “art houses” in the city. case in
point. the World Premiere engagement of Ingmar
Bergman’s Oscar winning Cries and Whispers was
held at the Cinema 1 not in his native Sweden.
I am a native New Yorker and lifelong moviegoer
and believe the Cinema ½/3 can weather any
potential competition from the revamped 62 St.&
1st Ave. if it returned to its roots so to speak.
what do you say?
I always connect souvenir programs with roadshow
engagements. to which did this theater ever hold
a traditional roadshow engagement?
also were there any other BIG regular release films
that opened here that had souvenir programs.
to Al. A.. many thanks for your reply. now
when the 62 St. & 1st Ave. opened it was not
only a state of the art facility but offered
the studios multiple screens for a BIG film.
to which it didn’t save the theater than why
would it now?
being an avid moviegoer I would say the fact
that the 62St.& 1st Ave. is all the way over
on 1st Ave. is a much bigger problem to
overcome than any competition the revamped
62 St. & 1st Ave. might possibly give the
to Al. A.–
while this theater on occasion does play a big
mainstream film mostly it plays artsy films. so
I don’t see it being in peril that much whenever
the 62St. & 1st. Ave. reopens.
another question. regardless of how up to date
the 62St. & 1st. Ave. redo is won’t it have the
same problem the theater has always had. namely
its all the way over on 1st. Ave.
to AL A.–
first whoever is taking over the 62 St. & 1st Ave.
multiplex wouldn’t they have to do a fairly complete
renovation? the place has been boarded up so to
speak and gathering dust for yearsssssssssss.
secondly if and when the 62 St. & 1st Ave. reopened
why would it give the Cinema 1 that much competition?
this theater survived the first opening period.
is there any info at all about how eminent this
theater’s closing might be? remember the eminent
closing of the Ziegfeld took yearssssssss to
to Escott O. Norton I thank you yet again. from
all the talk following the IMAX redo I got the
impression the interior had been radically changed.
but if I understand your latest reply correctly
the interior is 80% the same as when it opened
May of 1927. that’s good to know that the IMAX
redo didn’t do away with that much.
I want to thank Escott O. Norton for your detailed
reply. it was quite kind of you to do so. a 3rd way
of the asking the question. percentage wise how
much of the original 1927 interior is left? 40%
Hello Again from NYC-
I guess another way of asking the question
would have been this- while the exterior doesn’t
seem to have changed much how much of the
1927 opening interior is left?
Hello From NYC-
I haven’t had the opportunity to visit L.A. since
the Chinese had its IMAX redo, to which a question.
aside from the screen has anything in the theaterinterior been changed that much. I am assuming ithas landmark status so that the renovation wouldhave been able to change just so much.
I could swear I bought my The Happiest Millionaire
souvenir program during its 1st run engagement at
Radio City Music Hall. another thought- has anyone
ever come across a souvenir program for Cheyenne
Autumn which played this theater?
I am trying to find out exactly what the
“maintainence problems” were that apparently
lead to the closing of the theater.
I read the post you stated. I was surprised by
your rather recent post since I hadn’t read anything
anywhere. articles about the Ziegfeld’s closing were
found everywhere. why not this theater.
also you apparently didn’t my sarcastic comment
about trendy hipsters. all these much loved movie
theaters get razed just to build a retail shop
of some sort for trendy hipsters. so it can apply
to this theater as well. do we really need another
such retail space.
the eminent closing of the Ziegfeld was reported
yearsssssssssssssssssss before it actually happened.
so what was said about this theater?
also do we really need another upscale boutique
for trendy hipsters? that’s the reason we’re losing
since when is the Cinema ½/3 in danger of closing?
while I have been a big fan of the Cinema ½/3 formost of my moviegoing life I don’t see how theCinema 1 can show a film in 70MM. the screen isn’t thatbig.